picoGUI: An X Alternative?
bockman writes "While started as a PDA-oriented project, the picoGUI people seem to be implementing many ideas which I think would be good also for a desktop graphics server ( high-level client/server protocol, presentation layer in the server _but_ modular, application management also modular,...). So I wonder: what would it take (apart porting tons of applications) to make it a suitable alternative to X+[your toolkit of choice]+[your window manager of choice]?"
This looks like an API at the HTML level. We have an API at the HTML level; it's called HTML. Do we need another one?
Only if you want to use good style. If you wanna be stupid, than having main return a void is perfectly accetable, and usually compiles okay.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
I know this offtopic but why didn't Apple provide compatiblity with X in their GUI? I think they would have at least doubled the amount of apllications that could be run on their platform and herded some developers over to their camp as well. I thought X was bloated, but OSX is relatively slow on my Titanium laptop and I have 768M of Ram...Even using the X Fink provides is faster!
"You helped our nation celebrate its bicentennial in 17 -- 1976." --George W. Bush, to Queen Elizabeth, Wash
My "ask slashdot?" submission a couple of weeks ago for discussion on Xfree86 alternatives was rejected, and now there's this one based on a specific alternative. I've never had a story accepted. Oh well, no one loves me :(
Chris
nice, a slashdot hitlist.