Slashdot Mirror


Pentagon to Track American Consumer Purchases?

Anonymous Nerd writes "I was looking at Fox News today and came accross this gem of a story . It seems the Pentagon wishes to create a massive database of every transaction made in America. I wonder how they plan to track purchases made with cash?"

28 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. I know... by CptNoSkill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how they plan to track purchases made with cash?

    Outlaw cash transactions..... Credit Card/Debit from now on only.. or else the terrrorist have won (tm).

    (just a joke...)

    1. Re:I know... by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder how they plan to track purchases made with cash?

      Precisely why from now on I will NEVER use my credit card when making crack purchases.

    2. Re:I know... by BitterOak · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I wonder how they plan to track purchases made with cash?

      Simple. Require that an I.D. (such as a driver's license) be presented when making cash purchases. This will be done in the name of preventing counterfeiting.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    3. Re:I know... by CleverNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      Precisely why from now on I will NEVER use my credit card when making crack purchases.

      But if you don't use your credit card, you're missing out on the Cash Back! And the Bonus Miles!

      Why get just crack, when you could earn credit towards a trip to Bolivia?

  2. Cash? by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you, a terrorist?

  3. Actually by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't have that big a problem with that, providing all the politicians get their transactions logged and screened as well. That'll probably clean up a lot of problems...

    (I also pay in cash alot, so nyeh!)
    =Smidge=

  4. If you really oppose this law by eXtro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    then the right thing isn't necessarily to pay cash, or barter or start your own currency. Jam there databases with useless information. Buy paper towels and toilet paper with cash, subscribe to 2600 with your credit card. Leaving no trace isn't realistic for most people, even if you only use cash chances are you withdrew that cash from a bank, or a bank cashed your check. Instead concentrate on leaving a wide swath of purchases that indicate you're a "subversive" for them to discover when they mine their data.

    1. Re:If you really oppose this law by adb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree that that's what you should do if you want to practice civil disobedience by encouraging them to spy on you for no good reason. I don't agree that that's what you should do if you want practical privacy.

      Observe the following technique:

      • Get direct deposit from work. (Ooo! Scary! Electro-trail!)
      • Pay your fixed bills (for me, that's rent, DSL, and the phone line that the telco monopoly requires me to have in order to get DSL from Speakeasy) in the same way every month.
      • Always withdraw all the rest of your money in cash and do whatever you like with it.
      • Always give Radio Shack a new false name and address. Be creative.
      • Every time you go to the stupormarket to buy some stupor, fill out the form for a new magic discount card, then give it to a random stranger wrapped in a religious pamphlet.
      • Oh god, I already don't care about this post.

      And then gosh, they can't track your actual purchases. They can still decide that you're one of those freaks who deals in cash and needs spying on, but there's no way to avoid that judgement unless you either don't work or work under the table, and there's likely to be too many of those to practically spy on quite yet anyway.

    2. Re:If you really oppose this law by adb · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Anybody with that kind of record is gonna make a mistake. I want all party members in the tri state district to monitor the city, county and state police on their CB. Mr. Shade is gonna fuck up. And when he does, he'd better pray the police get to him before we do."

  5. Duplicate by Krelnik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This was already reported on slashdot eleven days ago, though the link in this one seems to work better.

  6. kuro5hin by capoccia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    see also the "Scientia Est Potentia" ("Knowledge Is Power") article at kuro5hin.org. It's been there for two days already. It covers the same story, but without the anonymous coward troll comments.

  7. How soon before the aggregated data gets to... by dpilot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The IRS? Wouldn't this be a good one in tracking down tax evaders.

    Ordinary law enforcement? Obviously someone with any sort of transaction at a known head-shop must be handling illegal drugs.

    Deranged crackers? After all, it's aggregated data, and could be useful for stalking, or other purposes.

    Terrorist crackers? Find themselves, learn how they were found. Teach the next batch how to avoid those mistakes.

    Collecting the data is bad enough. Creating this aggregate is even more dangerous. Making use of it for other than protection from terrorists seems to me to be downright unconstitional. Some would argue that the whole thing is. OTOH, now that it exists we're unlikely to be able to find out how extensive it is, or what uses are being made of it, terrorism related or not.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  8. Cash by Ann+Coulter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most terrorists will use credit cards and checks without a second thought. Most necessary purchases for any terrorist can be placed without giving the slightest indication of terrorism such as gasoline, nails, backpacks, household ammonia, hexamine, car batteries, SUVs, glassware, growth media, gas masks, firecrackers, food, shelter, and prostitutes. Most of what would be tracked could be easily stolen from a low security University laboratory, libraries, by killing the owners of a gun shop (tricky), hospitals, stealing large trucks, or by killing Air Marshalls and taking their guns. Terrorists can easily build a scrapnel bomb or a culture of bacteria with less than a thousand dollars and perhaps a trip to the laboratory. The terrorists already have the policing under control, its you citizens who don't.

    Fox News can go to hell.

  9. Orwell anyone? by suprnova · · Score: 5, Informative

    SHHH...the thought police will hear you...
    it just gets worse and worse ever day...

    Also, look who is working on it...someone really really trustworthy with all of my information:

    Rear Adm. John Poindexter, former national security adviser to President Reagan, is developing the database under the Total Information Awareness Program. Poindexter was convicted on five counts of misleading Congress and making false statements during the Iran-Contra investigation.

    --
    --"The revolution will be simulcast..."--
  10. What else in the name of "War on Terror"? by hbmartin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What else will be done in the name of the war terror? /. has already posted articles about the home land security bill making "hacking" (typical media lingual misuse) a very serious crime. I mean here's activity that the article quoted the Govt. guru as saying "sudden and large cash withdrawals, one-way air or rail travel, rental car transactions and purchases of firearms". Cause normal people don't have financial emergencies, or move, and CERTAINLY od not excercise their 2nd ammendment rights.

    --
    Karma: Bizzare (mostly affected by varying internal caffeine levels.)
  11. Et tu, art department? by Dannon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I want to know is, could this Information Awareness Office have possibly chosen a worse logo for discounting the paranoid fears of conspiracy theorists?

    --
    Good judgment comes from experience.
    Experience comes from bad judgment.
  12. Lets face it kids...the terrorists have won by NiceGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bin Laden has done exactly what he set out to do. All he has to do is pop up from time to time and our half-witted "leaders" will do the job of destroying everything that makes America..America.

    1. Re:Lets face it kids...the terrorists have won by sulli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, the spies have won. The terrorists just unwittingly helped.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  13. Every AMERICAN CITIZEN??? by bbonnn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quote from the article: "A massive database that the government will use to monitor every purchase made by every American citizen is a necessary tool in the war on terror, the Pentagon said Wednesday."

    Do you think they're going to limit it just to American citizens, or was that just a weird inaccurate description used by the reporter?

    Hrm. If we're so worried about foreign terrorists (as well as domestic), you think they'd broaden the scope of the database ...

    1. Re:Every AMERICAN CITIZEN??? by kevin+lyda · · Score: 3, Interesting

      they won't be tracking most of my purchases - i left america back in 1998 when i realised far too many of my fellow citizens were spending far too much time discussing clinton's penis and not nearly enough time paying attention to laws like the dmca and dozens of others. or the widening gap between rich and poor. or dealing honestly and constructively with the multitude of injustices in american society. or seriously working on environmental, health and waste issues.

      instead, people were more interested in clinton's penis, the amazing efficiency of private industry (how efficient were they really?), and buying suv's.

      no one was all that interested in protecting freedom - maybe their pet freedoms but no one elses.

      as far as i can see, things haven't changed much.

      and actually, come to think of it, the us gov't does track a lot of my activity. eschelon is alive and well and has been for years. sounds like domestic american citizens will be getting a taste of what the rest of the world has gotten. if it feels invasive and wrong, keep in mind that unlike the rest of the world you guys have a say.

      but as usual, you're not saying much.

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  14. ACLU Petition by frantzdb · · Score: 3, Interesting
  15. I'm a terrorist by damiangerous · · Score: 3, Funny
    sudden and large cash withdrawals, one-way air or rail travel, rental car transactions and purchases of firearms

    My paycheck is direct deposited, but other than that I deal almost entirely in cash, so I make "large" withdrawals every week. Three times this year I've purchased a one-way rail ticket for a 300 mile journey to meet up with friends and travel back with them by car. I've rented a car once this year. I have a collection of firearms.

    Yep. Terrorist.

  16. Not all that sinister by medcalf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Total Information Awareness program will not, in fact, gather any information. Nor will it change who gets to see the information that the government already collects nor how long that information is maintained. All that this program is, is a way to gather together the information that the government already collects, in a form where data can be mined between elements which are currently not linkable. The press is getting it wrong, as usual, and the rash posters on slashdot are taking the press, oddly, at their words, then putting on the tinfoil hats and heading off into conspiracy theory heaven.

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  17. Lazy, lazy by adb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a big fan of the "cash your whole paycheck (after paying rent and bills), stick it in your pocket, and fritter it away on amusements" school of money management. Oddly enough, this makes me relatively hard to track this way. The shit about Radio Shack and the stupormarket was just gratuituituitous.

  18. NOT ALL THAT SINISTER?!? by IshanCaspian · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "where data can be mined between elements which are currently not linkable"

    As information is linked together the potential of that information is raised exponentially. It is only the fact that there is relatively little collaboration between the various government and corporate entities. The implied intention in linking our data together is that one will be able to predict who will be a terrorist and who will not. This is the stuff of Orwell, folks. Public libraries know I'm reading "Civil Disobedience" by Thoreau. The government knows I'm registered with some leftist party. I have a registered gun. All of those pieces of data are currently kept with people who need to know them to do our job. Political organizations need to keep mailing lists. Credit card companies need to keep their bills. Libraries need to keep track of their books, and so on. However, it is the mere combination of those pieces of data that causes us to transgress into the realm of oppression. Now, we have men or machines trying to connect the dots, to presume me guilty before I even commit a crime. That's one of the fundamental beliefs of our country, isnt it? Innocent until Proven Guilty? That is totally incompatible with the type of terror we are facing. This war on terror, although it started off with the gunning down of a few hapless, pissed off fundamentalists, must by nature totally consist, from here on out, of catching criminals before they commit crimes. That is the common theme of the government's reaction to 9/11: we should have caught them before they comitted the crime. That means that all advances in this war on terror must come about by knowing more about YOUR life, what YOU buy, and trying to determine whether or not YOU are a terrorist. Unchecked efforts to capture criminals before they commit crimes is the cornerstone of oppression, the very mechanism by which all political distopias create their horror in the reader.

    The parent post is totally missing the danger in this advancement. It's very easy to point and laugh and make dumb cracks about tin foil hats, but your liberties are being steadily eroded.

    Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither.
    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
  19. HA! YOU BUY PORN!!! CAUGHT YA!!!! by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Pentagon,

    Rear Adm. John Poindexter is going to spend a buttload of money to build a supercomputer when a phone call would do - yep, I dig porn. I hope that satisfies your curiousity. I stop in the adult book store occasionally. And he's going to log all of my web hits? Mostly porn sites. You want a back door to my computer? Just to save you the effort it's full of porn. Go figure.

    So by everyone just speaking up and admitting they dig porn, perhaps we won't need to build this computer. Maybe we can save some tax money and spend it on KILLING THE FUCKING TERRORISTS!!!!!

    I mean, for christ sake! Logging everything the CITIZENS of this contry do and say and buy! Hey, why not track who we fuck? What we eat? Stick our DNA in there for good measure! How we vote! Record every one of our phone calls and store them!

    I know you're a bit freaked out after Sept. 11, but TRACKING THE CITIZENS of this country doesn't make much sense when the attacks were carried out by NON-CITIZENS!!! Track them! Prove it by tracking one! Just one. Track OBL and snuff him!

    Wanna make a difference?? CONTROL OUR FUCKING BORDERS and reform the INS!

    PS - Being that the supercomputer and database are likely to exist already, and the law was just a nice formality, then I imagine this message will actually make it's way to you. I hope it provides you with some amusement, being that I am just a pion, insignificant. Just an American.

    Gotta go, Big Brother! Gonna eat a cheeseburger and watch the Victoria's Secret show. You probably knew that already, but I'm just making sure.

    1. Re:HA! YOU BUY PORN!!! CAUGHT YA!!!! by Sherloqq · · Score: 3, Funny
      (emphasis mine)
      • Rear Adm. John Poindexter is going to spend a buttload of money to build a supercomputer when a phone call would do - yep, I dig porn.
        [...]
        You want a back door to my computer? Just to save you the effort it's full of porn.

      In light of your internet activities, I must say, the choice of words here is quite fitting :)
      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
  20. No more cash by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wonder how they plan to track purchases made with cash?
    Outlaw cash transactions.

    I wish that that were actually funny. I'm assuming that we'll start to see just that, with certain types of purchases (such as airline tickets) only being allowed through some electronically trackable means. This administration means business and they have repeatedly shown that they are entirely willing to do things that would have been dismissed as ludicrous less then a year ago.
    Yeah, yeah, "Good for all debts public and private". Whatever. Stop thinking that your standards are theirs or, in fact, that illegality or irrationality make something impossible.
    The Homeland (yeah, right) Security Act has plenty of provisions that most of us would dismiss out of hand in any other context.
    The White House is very, very serious indeed and they are the progeny of Iran-Contra, the Watergate break ins, and a hundred other proofs that, yes, they can get away with it.
    No games anymore, folks. Simulation is over and this is certainly not a drill.
    So, any estimates on how soon they go after any successor to Beanz and the like for being too transferrable and not trackable enough? Any predictions on how many anonymizers for purchases we're going to see? Since credit card anonymizers for porn are under attack the game is already under way.

    I predict a system cropping up where you can walk into a storefront and buy a "corporate credit card" with an anonymous name or equivalent and a predeposited balance. Say, a $500 card made out to Joe Foobar with a confirmable balance. Use up the balance and either throw it away or go to any branch and put more cash into this identity. No questions, no ID needed, no fuss, no muss. I'm betting that one of the pawn shop companies currently going national (there are several) will get into this and that they will start having spammer-style constant swapping to new Visa or MCd providers. I'll also bet that this will become illegal within three years and keep existing under a succession of forms. Further, I'll bet that we're going to start seeing a serious increase in Americans with foreign bank accounts that come with credit cards. Sure, I've got a Visa; Bank of Rome, thank you very much.
    Yes, cyberpunk is ever more real by the day and I fucking HATE IT. But I'm not going to be stupid enough to deny that it is happening.
    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.