Slashdot Mirror
Another Critical Microsoft Hole
gmuslera writes "Not was enough that recent vulnerability in IE that can run any program in an unpatched windows system. Now there is another
related to an ActiveX control that can make IE and IIS to run any code in the system. The Microsoft solution? kill the related ActiveX control and replace it with a safe one. The Microsoft problem? As this control is Microsoft signed, any site can require it, upload it and replace the "good" one with the vulnerable one. The final recomendation from Microsoft? Don't trust/run ActiveX controls signed by Microsoft." Gimble points to the appropriate locations on Microsoft's website: "Another buffer overrun (that allows arbitrary code to be run) has been admitted to by MS, and it affects IIS and IE on clients (but not on XP), and they have a patch available here Security Hotfix for Q329414. The kicker is that a patched system can be rendered vulnerable again by a hostile web site or HTML email. The 'solution' from MS in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-065 recommends that you remove MS from the list of Trusted Publishers."
Why doesn't Microsoft wake up and just apply the "mozilla patch"? :^)
Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
Not was enough that recent vulnerability in IE that can run any program in an unpatched windows system.
Difficult to read this post is, hmmm?
I removed Microsoft from my "trusted publishers" list a long time ago ; )
Today the DOJ announced that they would no longer trust Microsoft and had removed Microsoft from the list of companies it would allow to police themselves. This was done on Microsoft's advice as they felt they could not be trusted not to screw around like they had before.
"Lets face it" said Bill Gates "asking us to police ourselves is like asking Dan Quayle to front a literacy program, its just not a good idea"
An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
It just makes us look like insecure teenagers
Maybe we should apply the SECURE teenager patch I thought I saw somewhere....
...that the only safe place to run a Microsoft browser is on an Apple Computer operating system.
Wait a minute. You mean I can't trust Microsoft?
Well yes, but now you run in the horrible paradoxal loop !!
Suppose MS say that they shouldn't be trusted. Assume you think it's right, so you don't trust'em, so you believe THAT sentence is false ! Therefore MS should be trusted. So of course you must trust'em, and believe they shouldn't trusted... And so on & on !
Finally their claim is just another way to make your system / brain crash due to stack overflow...
Tsuyoikoto ha taisetsu da ne, dakedo namida mo hitsuyousa (Strength is an important thing, but tears too are necessary)
beowulf cluster of yoda there are.
karmasuicide2k2
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
--note to self--
Consider buying stock in proposed Hades Ski and Ice Skating resort... it must be getting real cold down there about now, somewhere between slushy and completely frozen over.
...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
Microsoft has warned about a security hole in Notepad. While Microsoft prepares a fix, it advises that we all use EDLIN in the mean time.
(...)
"The simplest way is to make sure you have no
trusted publishers, including Microsoft. If you do
that, any attempt by either a web page or an HTML
mail to download an ActiveX control will generate a warning message."
(...)
We could use this idea also with SPAM. Why use Bayesian filters (that aren't still 100% safe)? We could open every single message and decide if it is SPAM or not. If it is SPAM we can then delete it... it's easy!!
This message doesn't need a signature
This message doesn't need a sig
Ahh, It's all coming clear... Microsoft is using A.L.I.C.E. now!
:-)
Microsoft1: All things you need to trust are from Microsoft.
Microsoft2: But all things are not always me need to trust are from Microsoft.
Microsoft1: Umm. But all things are not always are not always you need to trust are from Microsoft.
Microsoft2: Interesting. But all things are not always are not always are not always me need to trust are from Microsoft.
Microsoft1: Interesting. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not always you need to trust are from Microsoft.
Microsoft2: Huh. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always me need to trust are from Microsoft.
Microsoft1: Huh. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always you need to trust are from Microsoft.
Microsoft2: Umm. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always me need to trust are from Microsoft.
Microsoft1: And. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always you need to trust are from Microsoft.
etc.