Slashdot Mirror


Don't Stymie Nanotech

Anonymous Coward writes "A new paper released by the Pacific Research Institute says that nanotechnology holds benefits for society if not blocked by misguided regulation or outright bans. Already, some prominent individuals (like Bill Joy) have questioned the rationale of continuing nanotech research - PRI's paper explains that nanotech has more benefits than drawbacks, and that bans and heavy regulation are not in society's best interests"

9 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Has anybody checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    that paper that was released to make sure it's not actually made up of nanobots that want to turn the Earth to goo?

  2. Nanotechnology could destroy the universe by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: -1, Troll

    What would a self-replicating nano-machine do if it went out of control? It would begin grabbing every other atom nearby, and converting them into the same nanomachines, and would multiply unstoppably and explosively.

    It would eventually destroy the planet, as well as possibly the solar system and even the universe.

    Read this before you tout nanotech as a panacea! It is scary.

  3. Re:It doesn't take half a brain to see this. by LinuxLuddite · · Score: 0, Troll
    Nanotech doesn't play by the same rules as currently extant terrestrial biology.

    We can't 'eat' air and dirt and use it (and it alone) to grow and reproduce. Nanites could, in theory, do just that, by using raw materials in the air and the earth to reproduce. It all depends on (A) how they are programmed, (B) how they mutate, and (C) how lucky (or unlucky) we are.- Well, as the other reply below so eloquently put it, humans are imperfect. To create a grey-goo doomsday nanodevice would require perfect engineering, ensuring the device withstands all climates, can consume any material, and can avoid all attempts by people to stop it from growing. While I agree we need to be cautious, raising this cautiousness to absurd heights is just as dangerous as being completely carefree.

  4. Re:Religious paranoid idiots will ban anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    hey dont diss shit eating... some germans make a good living off that stuff... and i enjoy watching them do so..

    er i mean, eww shit.

  5. Re:CmdrTaco's first time with Tyrone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Hmm. While I appreciate the effort, I must say that this post was poorly executed. I recommend plundering the vast gay text porn archives and utilizing some open-source tool to rapidly replace text. This post had its heart in the right place, but it just lacks the natural unintentional hilarity of serious gay text porn literature. Thank you.

  6. Re:Problems probably mostly isolated to America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    The only thing that niggers will revolutionize is new ways to commit murder.

    Mark of Cain. It's in the bible. Read it. One of that admiral ackbar shit either.

  7. Re:misguided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    You're right, fuck the welfare state. I fact fuck all states. Give me all your money bitch!!

  8. Sun in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Just because sun is in trouble, with no way ahead for it's existing product lines/technology, they have taken the approach of bashing other peoples efforts to reach for the future. What a sad character, Bill Joy must be if he isn't even curious about what new technologies could accomplish.

  9. Re:It has more benefits than drawbacks... by greenrd · · Score: 1, Troll
    How the fuck did that get Score 5, Informative??