Electronic News Is Shutting Its Doors
ahess247 writes "You probably missed it, but last week, the publication that helped give Silicon Valley its name announced that it will be shutting down its paper edition next month. Electronic News is one of the oldest trade publications covering the electronics and semiconductor industries. Launched in 1957, it predates its main competitor EETimes by more than a decade. One of its main claims to fame is it was the first publication to ever use the phrase "Silicon Valley" in print. A reporter for the weekly paper, the late Don Hoefler wrote a series of stories entitled "Silicon Valley, USA" that started the week of Jan. 11, 1971. The name, as we all know, stuck. It was also within the pages of Electronic News that Intel Corp. first advertised its 4004 Microprocessor. Once considered the bible of the electronics industry, its last printed issue will go out to subscribers on Dec. 2. According to this press release from its current owner, Reed Business, the publication will shift to an "all digital format." All but three staffers have been let go, and they will produce what essentially amounts to an online newsletter. Not a fitting end for a publication with such an important place in the history of the semiconductors industry."
what is wrong with that?
Wasn't this the publication which was also, in part (at least from the "advertising", responsible for the widespread popularity of the Altair as well?
moto411.com
Or perhaps it is...
[Electronic News] will produce what essentially amounts to an online newsletter. Not a fitting end for a publication with such an important place in the history of the semiconductors industry.
Call it irony or call it poetry, but isn't this the most fitting end imaginable?
I am a Karma Library.
We are in the age of information, electronic information for that matter. This could be the start of a very big trend. Publicationscan save millions by providing their pubs online with a nominal subscription fee. Of course there will always be those who prefer their hard copy.
I don't think the point of the post was that EETimes is going "online only"...it's that they're in financial trouble and are (slowly) shutting things down.
moto411.com
All joking aside, I liked electronic news a LOT more than I liked EETimes. EN actually sent me relevant, interesting stories whereas EETimes only publishes articles based on the IEEE's agenda du jour
Am I the only one who notices that EETimes articles are almost always political in nature whereas EN just reports the facts? I will miss EN for sure.
This is typical of the IT industry. IBM - the pioneers of the homePC lost out to other companies like Dell/Compaq/HP. The GUI pioneered by Xerox (poor sods) lost it to Apple and then finally to Microsoft. Even the console market - Sega and Nintendo are losing out to the playstations and maybe the Xbox(still to be seen). SO why not a newspaper ?
|/________
|\A|ALYS|
1957? I can just imagine the first "Hardware Review":
We started our review of this machine several years ago and we are pleased to unveil our 3Dmark results for the IBM 608...
So much to do, so little bandwidth.
--
Try Mozilla
Change, and the new superseding the old, is what the Silicon Valley is all about. Yes, companies come and go, but it isn't the companies, per se, that make SV what it is. It's the human infrastructure, the critical mass of talent that is always ready to move on and create the next "great thing."
It would be nice if they straightened out who can call themselves Silicon Valley North; Calgary, Ottawa, Seattle, Portland or Markham (Toronto)?
I don't think the point of the post was that EETimes is going "online only"...it's that they're in financial trouble and are (slowly) shutting things down.
of course they are... if the public weren't so slow, MOST if not ALL print publications would be in financial trouble. This is the way things are heading, and publication companies are realizing that you can publish the equivelant of an online newsletter or magazine with a MUCH smaller staff and MUCH cheaper costs than a dead tree version.
Pull out the horse-drawn carraige similies if you must, but technology and human advancement marches on..
And, online versions mean that you don't have to toss out a pile of mags every so often.
I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
Oddly enough, those trees you think it's cute to anthropomorphise are also made up of those same 14 billion year old recycled electrons.
Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
I'm not talking about Electronic News, I'm talking about this particular reply.
/.
Look at the numbers - barely a quarter of the normal replies, and a tenth if it was a story about William Shatner doing an interview. That tells me two things:
1) This article does not belong in
2) It's no surprise that EN is dying.
I did read EN back in the 80's and 90's (it was good), but I haven't picked up a copy since then.
BTW - it would come as no surprise to me that this is neither read, replied to, or moderated, but you can prove me wrong. Go ahead.
It was inevitable. Faithfully following Moore's law, the volume of semiconductor news has been doubling every 18 months since the invention of the integrated circuit. The last issue of the Electronic News was about 43 billion pages long, and the print run consumed the entire output of the British Columbia pulp and paper industry.
Please donate your spare CPU cycles to help fight cancer and other diseases
If something bad is happening, why is Electronic News publishing great articles, like this one about the conversion of cars from 12 volt systems to 42 volt systems: Gearing Up to 42V?
I always thought Silicon Gulch predated Silicon Valley.
Way back I asked myself "How can anyone stay in business publishing on paper with the printing costs etc with the net?"
I got my answer more recently with the dot com bust.
Not enough readership is online. Advertising isn't priced right and advertisers fear online media.
But thats changing.
For Electronic News it's already changed. It's readership is totally online by now with out exception.
The advertisers aren't affrade.. Microsoft, IBM etc all cutting edge companys use electronic marketting and prefer it to print.
It's priced right. They are premiuim ad space in the e space but not so much in the paper world.
Your subscription to your local newspaper covers some of the printing costs.
Ads take up the bulk of the papers operating costs. Those ads have to be pricy to pay for everything.
That's how it works.
With free web publishing your publishing costs are slashed to a much more managable price level but unless you can pull in the same money with e-ads the transition dosen't pay.
I don't actually exist.