Reading Between the Lines of Nazca

Kathy Miles writes "About 2000 years ago, the people in an area of Peru etched drawings in the ground so large that they cannot be seen easily except from high above the ground. Many explanations, some far into the realm of science fiction, have been offered for the lines but now two archeologists think they know why the drawings were made. They believe that the area was then desert and that the drawings were all about water."

Comments

Why do they look like birds?

[jericho4.0]

This isn't totally convincing, but it's better that UFOs. The question about these drawings is 'why are they so damn big?', as many can only be viewed from above. Explaining them as directional indicators towards water doesn't explain why they look like birds. Or why they look like anything, for that matter. I think any desert culture would have water as a centeral them in their mythology, so finding some objects related to water isn't a huge suprise.

I think the easiest explanation is that they started out as a small scale art/devotional form that gained favour with the ruling class as a sign of prestige. That generated pressure to build 'em bigger, much like what might have happened on Easter Island.

That thereoy of Easter Is (can't remember a reference, sry) also maintained that increasing enviromental pressure on the island drove more energy towards trying to get the attention of the gods. Maybe desertifcation drove the same in Peru.

Re:Why do they look like birds?

[JabberWokky]

There's a better article explaining this better. I think I read about it several months back on Slashdot. The key point that really drove it home is that they took one that didn't seem to point to a well, "translated" it, drove to that point, and then discovered an unknown well.

--
Evan

Re:And that tells me?

[Anonymous Coward]

It's over a distance of 500 sq miles, which is about a 22.3 * 22.3 mile square. People can see 22 miles and with any number of instruments (a flag, a shiny bit of metal, whatever) could direct others to draw lines. This would only take a few days to mark the places to dig.

"But during the day, there is an upper limit to the distance at which objects can be discerned on the earth's surface. Craig Bohren, writing in Weatherwise magazine, states that this is about 200 miles under ideal conditions." - Source. This is backed up in many places, "Visibility [...] averages about 30 miles because of declining air quality, according to park literature. There was a time, however, when the view regularly was up to 233 miles on a clear day, according to the National Park Service."

So around 200 miles would be the limit. That is, if it were that large. The longest one is only 90 metres long ("the hummingbird figure is over 90 meters long."), so marking out figures in a 90x90 metres wouldn't be difficult. Given a week, any of us could do it.

"Straight lines go on for kilometers varying from straight by only a few degrees." ... so here we have the actual challenge, which spans a few kilometres.

Also, it's not like we've got original drawings that they were trying replicate. Also, what they were trying to replicate was rather stylised anyway. They may have got the beak all wrong, but we'll never know. It looks like a bird, but if they were five metres out could anyone tell a mistake was made?

It's impressive, but not out of anyone's reach. Lines stretch several kilometres and vary by several degrees. Figures are considerably smaller. I want to see it, it's impressive. No reason to think it was non-human, though.

Primitives aren't

[ghostlibrary]

They're cool, but... the Hummingbird is only 90 meters, i.e. just under 100 yards, or the size of a football field. And they don't use ultratech to mow the lawn of that.

There's always this strange image that 'primitive civilizations can't do what we can do today because they lack machines'. They also lack 16-hour workdays and email sucking up their night hours; they have free time. And a good basic grounding of basic engineering-- surveying and laying out straight lines isn't that difficult.

Will archaeologists from the far future someday look at, oh, the Luxor at Las Vegas and think "the beacon on top must have been to religiously signal the gods!"

Will they look at the hundreds of regular 100-yard (football) fields, neatly hewn with strange and different sets of letters carved into each of the long ends, just after the Y-shaped ritual mark, and think "obviously a place of worship".

Related to this misinterpretation, at the Smithonian they have a set of ancient potware, cutlery, china, etc. And it's marked "ritual cookware". Again, an attempt to mark as religious or mystical, something that could just has easily been mundane. Such as 'the nice china for when the relatives visit'.

So really, if two bored farmers can create crop circles for years just for a lark, the idea of a civilization saying "Let's make some water pointers and, gosh darn it, let's make them artistic and fun as weel" isn't too weird.

Nasca/Palpa Lines: the case-modders of the BC era!

Water?

[penguin_punk]

Would it not have been better to build something up, not out? With all the work that was put into this, IMHO, I would think that if it was for water, it would be better to use your time to start stacking rocks up, even if it's into one large pile (per site). This way if you're stumbling across the desert you would be able to see the marker from a farther distance.

Maybe I'm just old-fashioned (probably not as old as YOU, but I grew up reading conspiracy and UFO files on bbs') but I still like the idea of the images being signs to aliens. ...Really. I mean, check out 'The Owl Man'. Does that not look like our friend Mr Aldrin? (hehe. Buzz=funny name. Like my friend 'Shitter'. I'll never figure that one out.)

In any case, I'll stick with my alien conspiracy.

On a side note, isn't Atlantis recently being 'proven' to be located in South America too? ...And the plot thickens. (Don't get me started on 'the money changers' hehe)

Re:Water?

[meatpopcicle]

Thats just a theory. One of many. What it comes down to is that the scientists have no idea what they were for. They can speculate, and thats all.

I've been to Peru and took many pictures of these lines. They are fabulous! I don't know if they were for aliens or just for water, whatever their purpose, they were very important to the people of the area.

If you think "why would someone build these lines?", you should really be asking yourself why would people build the:
-pyramids
-great wall of china
-world trade center

Bullshite

[cornjchob]

Ok, it's fine and dandy if people want to believe that these things were for water. But how did the people see them? And I'm not just talking about that you need to be high from the ground...you can't even see most of the markings from the ground! You wouldn't even know a line were there if it weren't for the fact that many of them are deeper than their surroundings. How does one explain that? I'm unaware of any primitive people's technology that includes anything like a material or coating or anything that changes with angle. None. And besides that, why would these people be in the desert? There's plenty of water everywhere else, not even 30 miles in each direction. People--primitive or not--don't do that.

Give me one piece of evidence that proves anything with any of these line sites, and it's probably wrong. A good book to read is "Arrival of the Gods" by Erich von Daniken. While I don't believe most of his beliefs, the book presented a lot of good points, such as those I've listed. Points that are easily provable scientifically and have been documented and cited and that lay to waste most theories formed.

I'd also like to point out that the theory in question has been around quite sometime.

wha?

[Transcendent]

Isla explained that some of the drawings point east or northeast toward the rivers.

First, most of the drawings are so huge that you can't see them fully without being suspended in air... seeing some random lines going in multiple directions on the dry desert wouldn't make me think there there's water anywhere, nor give me a sence of direction to where it was...

If they were going to point to water, why not make an straight arrow with a symbol for water by it???

~~~
~~~ ---->
~~~

There were also crab claws and other things which seemed to point to a water cult.

Ok, so they praised water... who wouldn't if you lived in a desert? It's the thing that kept you alive... I'm sure a lot of people held it in high regard...

I think they should have just stuck with religion... making symbols for your gods is a more plausable explanation than a complex, undefinitave, non-universal method of communicating where water is. We do crazy stuff for our god(s) too... Look at all the huge churches we make for our god(s)....

Re:Primitives aren't... here, here!

[qbed]

Good to see i am not the only one who wonders about that sort of thing. These people, whoever they were, were likely at least as smart as we are and as pointed out certainly had more free time.

Some hunter gatherer groups around the world work as little as four hours a day for all there daily needs. Now that is some serious free time.

As for the people who doubt the water thing. think about this... Many of the 30,000 year old dot paintings from from the caves in the Flinders Ranges (in Australia) are in fact detailed maps to finding water. The worlds oldest known maps in fact. If the Australian Aboriginals can do it, why not the Nasca/Paracas/Palpa? And make it artistic too while your at it!

Q

Re:And that tells me?

[Anonymous Coward]

The Andean civilizations were fairly able as surveyors. Their water works are excellent examples following steady grades for miles. So, design isn't a real issue. The main problem with the idea in the article, is that you still can't make out the figures except from an elevation. So, they are not likely guides for groundlevel searches for water.

Re:And that tells me?

[j_w_d]

It's over a distance of 500 sq miles, which is about a 22.3 * 22.3 mile square. People can see 22 miles and with any number of instruments (a flag, a shiny bit of metal, whatever) could direct others to draw lines. This would only take a few days to mark the places to dig.

I agree with your conclusions. The Inca and their predecessors were adept at surveying and built carefully graded canals that were miles long.

However I think you are probably neglecting some essentials about the visibility issue. First, the earth's curvature. From twenty miles off, the object would have to be tall enough to stand above your horizon. For a six foot tall individual this distance is less than five kilometers (see this for example). Atmospheric conditions that increase refraction can increase this distance, but normally not much.

Another point is object size. A two meter object subtends about 1/5,000 of a degree of arc at 10 kilometers - 6 miles - (if my trig is correct). Regardless of how clear the atmosphere may be, a normal human eye doesn't have that kind of resolution.

Very long linears can be accurately surveyed in short segments using geometric methods provided that care is exercised. A siting device such as a staff, ropes, and pegs for swinging arcs, and possibly a leveling device, are probably all that was necessary. High visibilty probably was not necessary. In fact, the lines could probably have been done in moderate fog.