Slashdot Mirror


"xbill" for Mac OS X

An anonymous reader writes "Seems like some guys have made a GPL'd Mac OS X game called xGates. It's very similar to xbill but you get to use a chainsaw and it's awfully violent. Funny to see how the Mac community is slowly but surely becoming UNIXified. =)" Hey, xbill was a Unix app first, but we Mac users have hated Microsoft and Gates since before Linux or xbill even existed! :-)

72 comments

  1. Wow by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This wrong on 4 different levels of wrongness. I love it!

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Wow by b_pretender · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Although I'm no fan of Bill Gates, I find this game disturbing. Out of respect for a fellow human being, I don't need some game that shows a detailed image of someone running a chainsaw through somebodies stomach or bill gates' head being held high in the air.

      No Thanks. I prefer my gore to be anonymous as in Quake 3 violence.

      BTW, since Bill Gates does give so much of his (personal) money to education and third world countries, maybe we should respect him a little more by *not* playing this game.

    2. Re:Wow by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      BTW, since Bill Gates does give so much of his (personal) money to education and third world countries, maybe we should respect him a little more by *not* playing this game.

      Maybe if Bill Gates didn't have a monopoly over the OS market Apple would have more money to give to third world countries. Plus they could afford to give everyone a raise.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    3. Re:Wow by eyeball · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe if Bill Gates didn't have a monopoly over the OS market Apple would have more money to give to third world countries. Plus they could afford to give everyone a raise [spymac.com].

      Maybe if Steve Jobs & co. didn't have a monopoly over the hardware that runs OS X, Microsoft wouldn't have such a large market share.

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    4. Re:Wow by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1
      Maybe if Steve Jobs & co. didn't have a monopoly over the hardware that runs OS X, Microsoft wouldn't have such a large market share.

      There is a difference between having a closed system and having a monopoly. Steve Jobs & co open Apple systems up to clones a while back and it nearly killed the business.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we who? make your own decissions, If you fail to see the humor of this game, no one's forcing you to play it, why do you want to force other people not to play it? who gave you the authority to issue apple community fatwahs? It's just a joke man...

      in fact you probably don't have a mac, and can't play this game anyhow, otherwise you'd have found out just how fun it is! so stop whining ;)

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      BTW, since Bill Gates does give so much of his (personal) money to education and third world countries, maybe we should respect him a little more by *not* playing this game.

      That's really naive - it's just marketing. Their foundation is just an other Microsoft way of forcing others into Windows. It's pretty clever for it's tax deductable so it's much cheeper then ordinary marketing. That is you taxparyer contribute and help the Gates foundation to brainwash thous poor kids.

      No it's not worth respect.

    7. Re:Wow by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      I'm not planning to play the game because any violent games, whether anonymous or not, are simply not my cup of tea.

      However, there are enough people who hate Bill's products that I think he's wound up damaging more people's lives than he's uplifted.

      D

    8. Re:Wow by matzim · · Score: 1

      That's really naive - it's just marketing. Their foundation is just an other Microsoft way of forcing others into Windows. It's pretty clever for it's tax deductable so it's much cheeper then ordinary marketing. That is you taxparyer contribute and help the Gates foundation to brainwash thous poor kids.

      No it's not worth respect.

      I'm all for a little cynicism, but isn't there such a thing as too much? Bill Gates' foundation has given away 5.5 billion dollars. That's nearly 10% of the total assets of his company ($67 billion), and a much bigger share of his own personal net worth. And more than half of it was given away for global health improvement. How exactly does that brainwash people into using Windows? The people who are getting that money aren't concerned with what's on their desktop-- they're worried about dying of AIDS or tuberculosis!

      Listen, I realize that his personal giving does provide good publicity for Microsoft, and some of the things that company does makes me want to dry-heave, e.g. donating "free" software to the countries thinking about switching to open source alternatives. But to say that the man doesn't deserve any respect even after giving several billion dollars to charity-- causes that help the millions of people that are dying in third world countries-- well, that's just cold. I'm hoping that that your message's just flamebait, but if you're really that cynical, I feel bad for you.

    9. Re:Wow by soupforare · · Score: 1

      That's mostly because the clones had a superior product at a lower price...

      Of course, it is bad mojo to bite the hand that feeds you I guess.
      I often wondered why no one has reverse engineered apple's HW ala Compaq. I suppose if someone did they wouldn't make any money, maccies would shun it and non-maccies wouldn't care.

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, there are enough people who hate Bill's products that I think he's wound up damaging more people's lives than he's uplifted.

      Oh, yeah, of course, saving the lives of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of kids in the Third World with innoculations can never make up for making my life more annoying with a few hundred security bugs. Get some perspective for God's sake.

    11. Re:Wow by hype7 · · Score: 2
      Maybe if Steve Jobs & co. didn't have a monopoly over the hardware that runs OS X, Microsoft wouldn't have such a large market share.


      and maybe if they didn't have a "hardware monopoly", they'd end up with a hotch-potch operating system like Windows that doesn't run properly on anything.

      -- james
    12. Re:Wow by syd02 · · Score: 1

      It's also kind of funny how something automatically becomes nothing more than a publicity stunt simply because it generates good publicity. This only works if it is taken as read that the subject is incapable of doing anything good.

      Ahhh...western dualism. Nobody is just sort of evil or sort of good. Bill Gates is a monopolist...therefore, he is the darkness that lurks beneath the bed of every innocent child. Ellen Feiss fans, grab your chainsaws...

    13. Re:Wow by pi+radians · · Score: 2

      That's mostly because the clones had a superior product at a lower price...

      The clones also brought on more hardware errors than any Apple I've ever owned. You always get what you pay for.

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    14. Re:Wow by giaguara · · Score: 1

      linus has done much more. (and i have found no games where you would give neither steve nor linus)

      i don't like windows and the things associated to it. and gates is an icon of windows and its negative things. most people to whom i have given the link or sent the app have enjoyed theg game. i have heard no negative comments on it.

      if gates was being SO good ... why do so many education and gov places, especially in the third world choose linux?

  2. SFW? by blingitybling · · Score: 1

    Aren't there already x^n versions of xbill?

    1. Re:SFW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's just say xbill "needed" to be "innovated" and leave it at that...

  3. UNIXified by skinfitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny to see how the Mac community is slowly but surely becoming UNIXified.

    Next they will be using the terminal app. Seriously though, transitioning from OS9 to OSX must be a bit like moving from an automatic to a stick shift.

    Watch this get modded down because it's mac related.

    1. Re:UNIXified by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Seriously though, transitioning from OS9 to OSX must be a bit like moving from an automatic to a stick shift.
      Not really. OS X is more like an automatic compared to other UNIX-based OSes, since the command line is there, you just never have to use it if you don't want.

      Actually, now that I'm using OS X, I have less technical stuff to deal with. I do a lot of technical stuff for fun, but in terms of what I have to do... well I don't have to do anything. The system has never crashed before. Back in the OS 9 days, things would start crashing, and you'd have to go in and do extension troubleshooting and stuff like that. If you bought a peripheral, you'd have to install drivers.

      I know you can get into much more confusing stuff with OS X, but like I said, that thing never crashes. On OS 9 it was an inevidability that you would regularly have to deal with tougher stuff.
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    2. Re:UNIXified by derch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Watch this get modded down because it's mac related.

      I have mod points to give. I was going to give one, but you had to put that line in.

      This is the Apple section. Mac related comments are, well... expected and common place in the Apple section. There are moderators who specifically hit this section because it's not overly moderated and reading at -1 is much easier on the eyes (and on browser load times).

      Save your cynicism for a Mac comment in a 'BSD is dead' or 'Windoze blows' article.

    3. Re:UNIXified by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously though, transitioning from OS9 to OSX must be a bit like moving from an automatic to a stick shift.

      Interesting analogy. It's more like transitioning from a 60's automatic to a tiptronic.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:UNIXified by brianosaurus · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wow! This is a mac section? Really? No way!

      I mean, is that what "apple" in the url means?

      For a minute there I thought the original poster was being ironic, perhaps even funny. But thanks to you, I now understand that he's in fact an utter moron thinking his mac-related post (a reply to a mac post!) would get modded down.

      I'm glad someone is keeping us informed.

      Thanks man!

      (Now watch this get modded down because I'm a dick ;)

      --
      blog
    5. Re:UNIXified by inkswamp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Seriously though, transitioning from OS9 to OSX must be a bit like moving from an automatic to a stick shift.

      Not exactly. I've watched non-geeks where I work move from OS 9 to OS X without much problem and without noticing too much difference. Apple did a good job of hiding a lot of the geek stuff so a better analogy would be that going from OS 9 to OS X must be like moving from an automatic to a stick shift that lets you drive like it's an automatic anyway.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    6. Re:UNIXified by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      transitioning from OS9 to OSX must be a bit like moving from an automatic to a stick shift.

      Not really - it's more like moving from a Kia to a Lexus.

      --saint

    7. Re:UNIXified by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm glad to be finally learning Unix. I'm a long time Mac and Windows user, and have used a few Solaris and Linux accounts but never used Unix on my machine because, frankly, I spent days configuring my machine back in the DOS days and am sick of that crap.

      With OS X, I get a fully working machine that's designed to be highly usable with minimal configuration. I can, if and when I want, alter and tweak that configuration. I can, if and when I want, delve into the depths of the machine to see how it works. Granted, AppKit is closed but I'm pretty overwhelmed by the scope of the APIs. I'm also overwhelmed by the sea of knowledge available on newsgroups and in documentation.

      And, of course, there are plenty of GNU et al utilities to learn, so I'm happy to plug away at that level. With any luck I'll find enough time between paying work and school to start really hacking some open source projects.

  4. Re:Mac users rewriting history again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Looks like XBill dates to 1994 -- "XBill was mostly written during the summer of 1994 by Brian Wellington and Matias Duarte". While Mac OS X is newer than this, the Macintosh OS and Mac community date back at least a decade before 1994, to the infamous Superbowl ad in 1984, and some would probably even argue before this, to the Lisa and Apple IIe systems if you allow for Mac Users == Apple Users.

  5. But there's been xBill for OSX for almost a year by OiBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    xbill was ported to OSX almost a year ago.

    http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-PaloAlt o/ 8861/mac/#macbill

    --
    `fortune -o`
  6. Amiga users were first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmmm. us Amiga users were hating IBM and Microsoft before Macs or Unix or X-Anything existed

    Amiga One! Just wait!

    1. Re:Amiga users were first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and Amiga comeback rumors pre-date Linux and the modern iterations of most operating systems...oh, wait...

    2. Re:Amiga users were first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you weren't. There were no Amigas in the 1970s.

    3. Re:Amiga users were first by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Informative

      hmmm. us Amiga users were hating IBM and Microsoft before Macs or Unix or X-Anything existed

      Since UNIX predates Microsoft, I sincerely doubt that. The earliest work on UNIX dates to 1969. The zero date in UNIX is 1 Jan 1970. It was in use in a production environment by about 1971 or so. Microsoft was founded in 1975, iirc, after the Altair 8800 was created. The Apple II was out by 1977. The IBM PC and MS-DOS were released in August 1981; indeed, one can see influences from UNIX (and indirect UNIX influences through influences from CP/M) in MS-DOS. The original development of the Amiga began in 1982, and it wasn't released by Commodore (not its original developer) until 23 Jun 1985. X was developed in the mid-1980s according to the X.org website (later 1980s according to most other resources I found). Linus Torvald's famous email can be dated quite precisely, to 25 Aug 91 20:57:08 GMT.

      So one could argue that Amiga users were hating IBM before X users, Linux users, and OS X users, but that's about it. (Assuming that the "mid-1980s" date alluded to on the X.org site is after 23 June 1985).

    4. Re:Amiga users were first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know whose dumber, the guy that posted saying Amiga was out before Mac (Mac was 1984, I bought one) or the moderator who gave it a score of 4 and "informative". Both of you need to do some research.

    5. Re:Amiga users were first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if I remember correctly, the Amiga's Operating System was in fact developed on Sun workstations. (These are Unix machines)

      And many of the aspects of the Amiga OS that were good were based on concepts from Unix and the X Window system.

  7. MS - haters? by lburdet · · Score: 0, Troll
    "Mac users have hated Microsoft and Gates since before Linux or xbill even existed! :-)"
    so that's why all your efforts are to having MS produce word, excel and IE for Mac...

    gimme a break... you've been sucking Bill's tite since the dawn of windows...

    1. Re:MS - haters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Bill was "sucking" Apple's "tite" first, and for that matter *before* Windows existed. I mean, Excel was a Macintosh app first, for heaven's sake.

      Microsoft continues to make all these apps for the Macintosh because it continues to be a source of income and strategically smart.

      And regardless of the relationship between the companies, the Mac community has definitely been hostile towards Microsoft/IBM for a very long time. Apple may have had Microsoft invest in them back in 1997 to continue Office/IE support, but do you think the Mac community was pleased with this? This was probably the most hated moment in Mac history for the community, with the only solace being that it probably saved the company from going under.

      I don't know, it sounds like you're just talking out your ass, so it probably wasn't even worth responding to.

  8. Looks a lot like it's parodying Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I may be missing something, but it looks a lot like this game is poking fun at Microsoft (the software company based in Redmond, Washington). If you look at some of the screenshots, the "bill" that they use looks a lot like Bill Gates, one of Microsoft's founders. And the description they give of the "enemy" you're fighting resembles some of the mainstream media's portrayals of Microsoft (you may have seen them in the news a few times.) Gosh, I hope they noticed the resemblence...someone over at Microsoft (even Bill Gates) might be uncomfortable with this!

  9. Not only is it a game... by Whatsthiswhatsthis · · Score: 2, Funny

    But it's GPLed!

    Other than porting, what exactly can you do with the code for a chainsaw game?

    Oh yeah, BFC mods.

  10. xbill is a wannabe by analog_line · · Score: 2

    Anyone reading this been using a Mac long enough to remember "Bash Big Blue", which was just clicking on a jumping around IBM logo. I remember playing that on my family's Mac Plus back with the original Daleks game, Airborne, and Orbiter.

    1. Re:xbill is a wannabe by dalassa · · Score: 2

      Yes! Someone else with a mac plus and all the dinky games that occupied endless hours. Not only did I while away my youth playing Bash Big Blue, I spent probably months worth playing brickles.

      --
      Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.
  11. So, who else reached level 13? by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a simplistic game, but as Brain says when he flattens Pinky, "That was very therapeutic." Of course, the DoJ was useless! And of course, no matter how much you might, Bill wins in the end.

    Oh, and nice Rammstein soundtrack! Some of the other interface elements reminded me of the classic Ambrosia game Maelstrom.(which was ported to UNIX and later back to OS X)

    --
    "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    1. Re:So, who else reached level 13? by bo-eric · · Score: 1

      Endgame

      Module xBill has caused a segmentation fault
      at memory address 097E:F1A0. Core dumped.

      We apologize for the inconvenience.

      Nuts!

      (After level 15 on a TiBook with Debian and the built-in trackpad!)

      --

      -- Free speech is only free if your time is worth nothing.
    2. Re:So, who else reached level 13? by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 2

      A trackpad? Level 15? Dude, I'm impressed! I hate using those things myself.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
  12. Something terribly wrong with the game... by Tseran · · Score: 5, Funny

    Firstly, there is a huge problem. Bill installs Windows WAY too fast. If anyone I know could install Windows on a Mac in THAT short of time, I would think they switched it into an Intel machine. Even VPC doesn't load that fast ;) Secondly, as we all know, when Bill play with Windows in public, it blue screens. None of the Macs bluescreened once he installed Windows.... Good start, but we need more realism...and more bloody pieces of Bill lying around.

    --
    .sig: It's what's for dinner.
  13. Can we get an "Amen"? by matzim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well said.

    MS bites. I think we pretty much agree on that. But to take MS-bashing to the point where we revel in images of the chairman of the company being graphically dismembered, we've crossed a line somewhere.

  14. re-ported to mac you mean by veggiespam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i remember playing "xbill" long before the X windows version was written. it was on a mac se, long ago. if you read the xbill history in the tarball (or help screens), you'll notice they pay homage to the original mac game. so, the game concept returns back to its source.

    1. Re:re-ported to mac you mean by bwelling · · Score: 2, Informative

      Huh? README.Ports mentions that it had been ported to a Mac long ago, but it definitely wasn't written on a Mac. I think I should know...

  15. What... by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 3, Funny


    no Windows version? How is 90% of the population supposed to play? This game will go nowhere.

  16. UNIXIFIED???? by inkswamp · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Funny to see how the Mac community is slowly but surely becoming UNIXified.

    I thought it was the other way around. Seriously, I'm not trying to start arguments, but with all the talk I've heard about how OS X is the first Unix with a nice interface, I would think that Unix users have become somewhat Mac-ified. I don't hear nearly as much talk from old-time Mac users about how wonderful it is to have a CLI or Perl. I hear more chatter and excitement from the other site about how it's nice to have an interface that works so well. :^)

    Too egocentric either way. Both statements are probably true--Mac users and Unix users have probably moved toward each other.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:UNIXIFIED???? by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 2

      It's true that Mac users would get more out of Terminal if Apple had provided any instructions on how to use it. I still remember how to use DOS, but I've zero previous experince with a UNIX CLI, and I've only picked up a few commands, like ls and cd. Not enough to do anything. And I don't have the funds for a book on the subject.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    2. Re:UNIXIFIED???? by l0wland · · Score: 1
      "I don't hear nearly as much talk from old-time Mac users about how wonderful it is to have a CLI or Perl"

      /me raises hand

      --

      "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
    3. Re:UNIXIFIED???? by hbmartin · · Score: 1

      I don't hear nearly as much talk from old-time Mac users about how wonderful it is to have a CLI or Perl.
      Hear it from me!

      --
      Karma: Bizzare (mostly affected by varying internal caffeine levels.)
  17. The funny thing is by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

    Mac - Pc haters for the most part actually know what they are talking about while most "How to turn on your computer for dummies" kind of people hate Macs because they probably can't afford them or they are too dumb to actually research it and just read that Micro$oft biased PC-World Magazine. I'm sure if Macs were cheaper they would dominate the market and if it was before the PC took off. Ah those were the times when most computers had no monitors and you plugged it into your tv.

  18. You MS hired mole-trolls never give up, do you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...gives so much of his [clip]...to third world countries...

    Strictly to buy favor for his corporation...don't think for one shrink-wrapped minute his heart bleeds for anything but his bottom line.

    gates deserves as much respect as an unlined trashcan.

  19. You have to be kidding! by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    we Mac users have hated Microsoft and Gates since before Linux or xbill even existed!

    Is that why you all use MS Office, MSIE, and buy hardware from a company that's partly owned by Microsoft...? Right...

  20. way to twist it...MS troll alert by djupedal · · Score: 2

    MS handed over $16 million to Apple as a patent settlement. Think courtroom, not boardroom. It was _not_ an investment. Try again.

    Blasted MS dolt-troll's can't help drinking the koolaid.

    phrggggrrrt!

    [[]]

  21. Dickhead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your facts straight before posting. Wait, i got it - don't get your facts straight and don't post. How's that?

  22. You forgot to add... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And I'm too stupid to find one of the many sites that explain how to use the Terminal - Using Google is too haaaaard"

  23. Oh but it was by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1, Troll

    Of course it was an investment. That way Microsoft can say to the judge, "see, there's competition - Apple - we're not a monopoly", when in fact they control Apple too. Over 98% of Mac users use MSIE as their browser and over 90% use MS Office for word processing / spreadsheets / etc.. So the OS isn't sold by Microsoft. Big deal. The OS by itself doesn't do much. As Apple used to say, "it's not what the computer does, it's what you can do with it". And most people with Macs use Microsoft software too. In fact, MS Office and MSIE are more dominant in the Mac market than in the Windows market.

    With 'enemies' like these, MS doesn't need any friends.

    I'm not saying the Linux community is entirely consistent, either. They say Microsoft sucks but then they spend all their time trying to copy Microsoft's look & feel. But at least they're just trying to make a copy, they're not using (and paying for) the original.

    RMN
    ~~~

    1. Re:Oh but it was by drive · · Score: 1

      i'm not saying anyone is better and i'm not trying to start a flame war, but saying most linux users don't use any MS software is complete bull. sure, they run linux as their main OS, but how many of them dual boot into windows or have a windows machine around somewhere? please... get off you soapbox

    2. Re:Oh but it was by SlamMan · · Score: 2

      IF Corel would just put Wordperfect back on the mac, there'd have a lot less MS users in X.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    3. Re:Oh but it was by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

      If they decided to stop making the Mac version, it's probably because they weren't selling enough to justify the expenses. Doesn't OpenOffice run on X...?

      RMN
      ~~~

  24. Hello, Mr. Coward by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    How about you post with your real name instead of telling other people to shut up as AC...?

    RMN
    ~~~

  25. ms paid trolls' are a laugh a keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the shovel...it's deep in here. Sad, actually, how some people earn a living.

    1. Re:ms paid trolls' are a laugh a keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst part is he seems to think he is paid by the word.

    2. Re:ms paid trolls' are a laugh a keystroke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, he is right, but that has always been a secondary issue for Mac users. They buy the most proprietary system on earth (hardware and software made and sold by the same firm), and then they pretend they're part of the free software movement just because Apple ripped off BSD.

      Go buy a new Mac, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates need a new yacht...

  26. disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't we all just get along?

  27. xGates readme file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Readme document accompanying xGates 1.0. Date 20/10/2002

    xGATES

    BILL is the owner of a powerful software company known for its monopolistic and predatory business practices, not to mention ruthless extermination of competitors. Now Bill has ported his market-dominant operating system to the Mac in an attempt to wipe out the last remaining obstacle between him and COMPLETE WORLD DOMINATION!

    BILL will attempt to replace the trusty old MacOS system on the world's various Macs with his own twisted derivative. Only YOU and your trusty CHAINSAW can prevent Bill from achieving his megalomaniac goal.

    On your way you will find allies to help you in your noble quest. Occasionally "THE MAN" himself will appear and undo Bill's foul mistreatment of his precious Macs. A lesser but none the less valuable ally is the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, which occasionally sees it fit to prosecute Bill for anti-trust violations. This will slow him down and distract him from the task at hand.

    GET TECHNICAL, YOU RHETORICAL DUNDERHEAD!

    xGates is a free computer game for the MacOS platform and is distributed under the terms of the Free Software Foundation's GNU General Public License, which should have accompanied your copy of the game. The game itself is written for the Carbon Application Programming Interfaces and will run on both MacOS Classic and on MacOS X. However, these are two seperate executable binaries. You can download xGates in a myriad of places, but first and foremost on the Soth Development website at http://soth.zoneit.com.

    Requirements

    150Mhz PowerPC 604e or better microprocessor (results may vary)
    6 Megabytes of Random Access Memory
    Approx. 2.5 Megabytes of Hard Drive space
    MacOS Classic (8.1 or later with CarbonLib 1.2 and Drawsprockets) or MacOS X 10.1 or later.

    By default, xGates uses the "Blit Entire Screen" option, which is an unoptimized processor hog. If you experience performance problems, then you can turn this off for more optimized performance in the Geek Options menu and/or turn off the game music and sounds. In some cases, switching to 16-bit (thousands) color will help.

    The Geek Options Menu

    No Chainsaw Jamming (default: off)
    Turns off chainsaw jamming, which theoretically allows you to hold down the mouse button for an indefinite period of time while playing xGates. However, due to some flaw in either my own programming skills or the MacOS design, the framerate will drop severely after a period of time if the mouse button is not released. Not recommended, really.

    Blit Entire Screen (default: on)
    This highly unoptimized and silly way of blitting xGates animations is the default. Why? Because it feels smoother, and it runs quite easily on a 300Mhz G3, hardly colossal requirements by today's standards. Disabling this will in all probability double your framerate. Recommended for people with slow processors.

    Fixed Framerate (default: on)
    xGates runs by default at 30 frames per second. If this option is disabled, the game will run as fast as the computer processor is capable of handling, which will in most cases result in extremely poor and unsatisfactory gameplay.

    Draw FPS (default: off)
    Only really interesting if you've disabled Fixed Framerate. A small black square listing Frames Per Second will be drawn in the corner of the game screen.

    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

    Below you'll find a list of questions I have taken the liberty of assuming will be frequently asked if they are not promptly dealt with. If you have further questions, please direct them to my email address, which is listed at the bottom of this document.

    Q: Why make xGates?

    If we tackle this question from a philosophical perspective, it becomes obvious that it's just as reasonable to ask "Why not xGates?". Why indeed? My motives probably wouldn't interest you, but if it makes you feel better you can take solace in the knowledge that factors such as boredom, idleness and an abundance of free time coupled with 1337 programming skillz tend to produce the most bizarre of things. Of course, a certain level of animosity towards this guy called Bill played a part.

    Q: Why call it xGates?

    The way I see it, there's already an "xbill" out there. I considered other alternatives but finally settled on this one.

    Q: Is xGates affiliated with xbill in any way? Do they have common code?

    A: No, on both counts. I have only played xbill once or twice on Linux, but I liked the game concept and expanded it to create a Mac counterpart. Apart from this and the fact that they're both GPL'd, they have little in common.

    Q: Who is that guy with the chainsaw anyway?

    A: We call him Ned. He is the product of Haukur Valdimar Palsson's fertile imagination but he probably exists somewhere in an alternate universe. Please consult us before ripping the artwork featuring him and Bill.

    Q: I want to program for the Mac. Can I get the source code?

    A: Certainly. xGates is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License and is thus open source software. You should have received a copy of the license with xGates. If you did not, please contact the Free Software Foundation (http://www.fsf.org). If you didn't get the source along with xGates, you can download it from the Soth Development website at http://soth.zoneit.com.

    Q: Are you going to make xGates II?

    A: At this point it's impossible to say, but I consider it likely. I have some good ideas on additional gameplay features for a sequel (for example weapon upgrades, more gore etc.) and it wouldn't take too much work to implement them. However, keep in mind that anybody can expand xGates as he pleases, due to the open source nature of the GNU GPL.

    Q: When I run xGates, I get the message "Could not load DrawSprocketLib library" and then it quits. What's wrong?

    A: xGates requires the DrawSprocketsLib extension to be enabled in the Extensions Manager. DrawSprockets has been part of the default MacOS install for a long time but if you don't have them installed you can download them from Apple's website.

    Q: When I'm running xGates, I get an error message and then the game quits.

    A: Aah, this means you have found a bug in the code or that the application resource fork is corrupt. See "Bugs" document for further info.

    BUGS

    xGates has not been particularly well beta-tested. I count on you, Joe User, to notify me of bugs and error that detract from the pleasure of playing the game. Optimal feedback would list Extensions, operating system, video card and game version.

    Known bugs

    - If you change the monitor resolution while playing xGates, it starts to draw the chainsaw and game objects with white backgrounds that overlap. If you manually change the resolution from within xGates, you'll get a warning about this. Relaunching the game should fix it.

    - If you select "No Chainsaw Jamming" from the Geek Options Menu and then hold down the mouse button for extended periods of time while playing the game, you'll experience an extreme framerate drop.

    CHANGES

    24/11/2002 - xGates 1.0 released.

    CREDITS

    Programming, Game Design, In-Game Graphics
    Sveinbjorn Thordarson

    Pencil Artwork
    Haukur Valdimar Palsson

    Interface Graphics
    Magnus David Magnusson

    I would also like to thank the following for their interest, comments, criticism and support:

    Brynjar Eiriksson
    Thorlindur Thorolfsson

  28. And...? by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

    As far as I know, Microsoft does not make or sell any Linux software. Lots of Mac users use Windows boxes too. Your point was...?

    RMN
    ~~~

    1. Re:And...? by drive · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, Microsoft does not make or sell any Linux software

      huh?

      Lots of Mac users use Windows boxes too

      yes, perhaps some might. but you'll have a harder time finding someone that frequently switches between macOS and windows as opposed to linux and windows. i'm speaking for home use, of course. you can't judge from what people are forced to use at work. my point is: perhaps mac users use MS software. they're usually honest about it. linux users (not all) on the other hand, violently bash MS while still booting in windows every day. look at the average slashdot reader.

    2. Re:And...? by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

      You said "saying most Linux users don't use any MS software is complete bull". Since I don't think Microsoft makes any Linux software, I don't think that any Linux user can - while using Linux - run Microsoft software (except under emulation - see below). He may, of course, run Windows on a different machine (or on the same one), just as he may run BeOS or OSX or Solaris. Of these, I think OSX is the only one with native Microsoft software.

      Linux has alternatives to most home / office software (browsers, office suites, media players) and also to most server softare (servers, databases, scripting). It lacks DCC software (video and image editing, music, etc.) and games. Some of these (both games and DCC) can run under emulation, some cannot. I doubt most Linux users use Windows for anything besides serving as the kernel for specific applications. Once you're inside 3D Studio or After Effects or Cakewalk, it's irrelevant what operating system you're using.

      What annoys me about Linux (and many Linux users) is that they're trying to copy Windows, instead of actually coming up with something better. In fact, for the last 7 years or so, Microsoft, Apple and Linux have just been copying each other ad nauseum.

      The natural order of things used to be:

      Xerox or IBM would come up with a new concept (mouse, GUI, windows, etc.). Apple would copy it almost immediately and make it look prettier. Microsoft would copy it two years later and make it look uglier. Linux would try to do the same thing in text mode.

      Xerox and IBM are now pretty much dead (or at least hibernating). Apple just kept making things look prettier and prettier until they arrived at something that looks like a shampoo bottle (I hate the iMac / Aqua look). Microsoft tried to out-Mac Apple and came up with XP, that looks like something out of a committee formed by Macromedia and Chicco. I think it looks even uglier than Aqua. Aqua is for girls, XP is for baby girls. Linux, as usual, is trying to copy both of them (they're not using text mode anymore, which has made it lose that 'retro' appeal).

      Personally, I'm sticking to Windows 2000 Pro. It's stable, it's fast, has tons of software, supports tons of hardware and has a sober, functional interface (especially when you complement it with a few command-line tools). Apart from the OS, the only MS software I use is Visual Studio and Word. As more software is released for Linux (and as Windows emulation under Linux improves), I might consider switching. But I really doubt I'll ever switch to a Mac. If I leave Windows it'll be to get rid of a software monopoly, so I'm not going to plunge into a software and hardware one.

      On the hardware choice / speed / price side of things, x86 wins too, so that's another point against Macs (from my point of view).

      Hopefully, the next version of Windows will introduce something new and useful (a property / database-oriented file system). Something that both Apple and Linux had years to develop and bring to end users but somehow didn't (too busy making anti-aliased icons). Don't get me wrong; I don't like Microsoft. Which is even more depressing when I look at the alternatives.

      RMN
      ~~~

  29. iTROLL ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple iTroll modding down posts in old threads because he got his ass kicked in a different thread. Typical. And sad. Get a life, Mr. Bibbs.