Linux Kernel Performance How Will 2.6 Measure Up?
An anonymous reader writes "This story offers some interesting performance comparisons between the latest stable Linux kernels (2.4.x) and the latest development Linux kernels (2.5.x), comparing performance on both a single processor and dual processors. These numbers help validate that the upcoming 2.6 kernel will outperform the current 2.4 kernel, at least in some instances..."
Will die! Whitney and I will slay it!
fp
How long until someone criticizing this law is told "If you've done nothing, you've got nothing to hide" and dragged off to a Homeland Security Office's dungeons for a dose of some rubberhose treatment just in case he actually does something to hide.
There were 12 MHz 486's?
Autopackage sounds a lot like my pet project Linstaller. I stopped development a while back to get my CCNE and haven't restarted it since. One problem I ran into was what libraries you could expect to be installed on any given platform. Sure, there's the LSB, but does the LSB specify a base set of packages that make up a desktop or a server?
./configure; make; make install;s tend to make distro specific code. Instead I left the cross distro compiling up to the packager. All I provided was an archive format and a self extracting gui or command line installer that totaled under 50k of overhead. I stopped around the middle of implementing the scripting language backend. I didn't like the way it was going, and as I said earlier, CCNE was calling to me.
My aim was a little different from yours though. I was going for complete binary packaging from beginning to end. No source building, as automated
Maybe I should start it back up. It's not like I have much else going on lately. hmm...
How is that off topic? Hes asking about performance under Extreme loads. That is if hes being serious. If hes not then we shall crucify him! I wonder what this will do to my karma...
Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
dumbass. there's no DP AMD boards don't support the 8bit ISA, your MGA is. (and MP2400 isn't out yet).
It's the price you pay to swim in cash, I guess ;)
Are you serious? Read the post again, with your 'funny spectacles' on...
Meep.
You're SO not funny..
But how is this news? Ever since the thread on Kernel Notes a month or so ago, most of us have known it this.
Please, don't post "Look how cool and leet I am" and then not even sign your posts. Who mod'd that up to 4
It turned out that for some reason the DMA and faster ATA features were switched off by the default boot process! All HD and CD-ROM data transfers were done by processor.
See /etc/sysconfig/hard-drives and switch on the DMA and other options. Alternatively use hdparm to change the parameters manually.