Understanding the Microprocessor
Citywide writes "Ars has a very thorough technical piece up entitled Understanding the Microprocessor. It's pitched lower than many Ars articles (all of which are a bit over my head, to be honest), but that's why it's worth checking out: it explains the fundamentals is a very clear and useful way. And as the author notes, this kind of information is really crucial to get a grip on before Hammer arrives."
I got in the MRI and they showed me a picture of the Hammer, but my boner told them what they needed to know.
>> And as the author notes, this kind of information is really crucial to get a grip on before Hammer arrives
/. posters who have no clue how a computer works and just spout BS about how what is better than what based on some marketing benchmarks.
Why? This doesn't explain why Hammer is better at all. Yay, now we can have a rudimentary explanation of how a CPU works, but it'll just encourage more uninformed fanboy type crap.
Basically, Hammer (64 bit cpus) = larger addressing space, not nescessarily faster processing. That's good enough for me, though.
But, it's like 9th grade physics students telling you why Einstein is a 'big dumbass'. AMD has Hammer! It better! Intel is gay! bleh.
Although, it is crucial for
But they wont RTFA anyways.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
is as important as understanding the particular interleave method of the Macintosh floppy mechanism. What does Joe Six-Pack care as long as he's got a desktop rocket?
I think an article like this will prevent comments like:
"AMD has Hammer! It better! Intel is gay!"
and will instead promote more educated comments like:
"AMD is TEH GODE! INTEL is TEH SUCK!"
Wake me when you kids are running RISC processors...
In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.