IDE RAID Examined
Bender writes "The Tech Report has an interesting article comparing IDE RAID controllers from four of the top manufacturers. The article serves as more than just a straight product comparison, because the author has included tests for different RAID levels and different numbers of drives, plus a comprehensive series of benchmarks intended to isolate the performance quirks of each RAID controller card at each RAID level. The results raise questions about whether IDE RAID can really take the place of a more expensive SCSI storage subsystem in workstation or small-scale server environments. Worthwhile reading for the curious sysadmin." I personally would love to hear any ide-raid stories that slashdotters might have.
At the company I work for, IDE RAID has become somewhat standard because we're basically cheap... At least it's standard on the servers that are fast enough to support it. The rest use dd to copy partitions between backup drives. My boss calls it "RAID point five" We lovingly refer to it as the ghetto network.
---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
I personally would love to hear any ide-raid stories that slashdotters might have.
Once upon a time, in an array far, far away, there lived a young princess who was worried about the integrity of her data...
You would think that after 130 graphs comparing the controllers he could come up with a stronger conclusion than "I cant really decide which one is the best"
"The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
And that is why fsck is used as a swear word.
-- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday