Slashdot Mirror


Chemotherapy Patients Set Off Subway Alarms

dave writes "Recently, cities such as New York and elsewhere have been installing radiation detectors in subways as an anti-terror precaution. However, as reported in New Scientist, patients who are undergoing radiation treatment are setting off the alarms. From the article, "a 34-year-old patient who had been treated with radioactive iodine for Graves disease, a thyroid disorder, returned to their clinic three weeks later complaining he had been strip-searched twice in Manhattan subway stations.""

28 of 525 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Radiation levels by JollyGoodChase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the guy's not carrying anything like a briefcase, where do they think he's hiding a 'dirty' bomb? Do the authorities think it's possible to carry a bomb on your person? So they think the tech is available to make the device that small? A strip search does seem a little over the top.

  2. Re:My uncle... [I CALL BS!] by PissingInTheWind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    /me set the BS flag up.

    Radioactive stuff is mostly used to follow something you ingest, or an injection.

    I really can't see the use of a powerful, radioactive drug taken every 6 months.

    Though I might be wrong, I have serious doubt.

    --

    A message from the system administrator: 'I've upped my priority. Now up yours.'
  3. The Bush/Ashcroft War On Constitutional Rights by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just more fallout (no pun intended) from the Bush/Ashcroft "War On Terrorism", which is really just a thinly veiled way to erode people's Constitutional rights. Do you think that strip searching a cancer patient is a reasonable search as defined by The Constitution? Do you think that radiation detectors that force cancer patients to reveal their illness and treatment to complete strangers is a reasonable form of search?

    People need to open their eyes and see what kind of police state the Bush administration is creating -- before it's too late.

    1. Re:The Bush/Ashcroft War On Constitutional Rights by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      September 11 tought us that commecial airliners could be misused as weapons. When you think about it, almost anything when used improperly can be used as a weapon.

      Think of high schools with a "zero tolerance" policy aganst knifes. They'll suspend a student has a kitchen knife in thier bookbag... but they'll forget that if the student puts 3 10 pound textbooks in their bag, and then throws it from the top of a staircase, that becomes a 30 pound dead weight which can cause serious injury. Bookbags don't kill people, people kill people.

      Because we can't think of all the possible ways terrorists can attack, we can only secure against the ones we can think of. The attacks we show we can stop are the ones they won't attempt. There's an unlimited number of unprotected ones they can try.

    2. Re:The Bush/Ashcroft War On Constitutional Rights by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The subway, your house, my house. but when the bomb goes off and we're all obliterated, well, on second thought, let's search people, in PUBLIC PLACES.

      What ever happened to probable cause? What probable is there for measuring the radiation emitted by a cancer patient?

      Brave men and women did not fight and die to protect our Constitutional rights so that cowards like you could trade those rights away at the first sign of danger.

      "Those who would give up liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
      -- Benjamin Franklin

    3. Re:The Bush/Ashcroft War On Constitutional Rights by Maul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, the moment I step out of my house I somehow give up my right to probably cause, my right to personal property, and so forth?

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    4. Re:The Bush/Ashcroft War On Constitutional Rights by Maul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think of high schools with a "zero tolerance" policy aganst knifes. They'll suspend a student has a kitchen knife in thier bookbag... but they'll forget that if the student puts 3 10 pound textbooks in their bag, and then throws it from the top of a staircase, that becomes a 30 pound dead weight which can cause serious injury. Bookbags don't kill people, people kill people.

      This BS has been happening for years before 9/11 as well. This is yet another injustice that has done nothing to prevent school violence, and turns innocent students into criminals.

      If a high school student is caught with any sort of knife on campus (in some cases a PLASTIC knife or anything that could be mistaken for a knife, gun, or other weapon), for whatever reason, they will be expelled.

      It doesn't matter if they accidentally left the knife in the bag from a hunting trip, thought a butter knife was OK, or whatever. It doesn't matter if the student has no record, is a straight A student, or whatnot.

      This has extended to other sorts of things. Kids have been expelled for giving a bottle of wine to their teachers as a GIFT, bringing advil to school, being ACCUSED of hacking school comptuer systems without proof, etc.

      These kids are then often shipped off to an alternative school that have purposefully been given inferior resources. There they will often will recieve an inferior education to their former peers and have little chance to get into a decent college no matter how they do at that school.

      This sort of thing has been in place for over a decade now in most school districts. It didn't prevent incidents like Columbine.

      Seriously, being expelled is the LAST thing a student thinks about if they intend to kill people. How is the threat of expulsion a deterrent?

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  4. Re:My question is... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The detectors are set at their most sensitive levels. Small price to pay for making the terrorists use some conventional explosives.

    Maybe IHBT, but all these "evil terrorists" have used are just conventional explosives, are there even any equivalent technologies in use now that detect these?

    So far it hasn't been demonstrated or even claimed that they even HAVE nuclear explosives, and I bet if they did they'd want to use amounts that would peg the meter, not be mistakable for cancer patients.

    The best I've read they can do is just make a "dirty" bomb, which can be a conventional bomb that merely spreads radioactive material rather than megaton destruction, and the only way to make a dirty bomb any sort of a threat is to put in enough material to peg any standard meter.

    So it sounds like another case where the people "protecting" us are simply building more roadblocks that prevent normal living.

  5. Re:Wake Up! Coward by puto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well posting as an AC and trolling as well. Ho hum.

    1. Cops do whip black ass, and white ass, hispanic ass, all kindsa ass. Course next to Latin America and Russia, I would prefer a US ass whuppin than one of those. Have seen South American and Russian cops tear it up. And people don't sue there.

    Hey you know what? I am a Jewish Hispanic. And I look like I should be selling rugs in a bazaar. I look more Arabic than most Arabs. I get searched in airports. Big deal, 5 minutes extra. Makes me feel kinda safe. I have been searched five times this year and the people in the airport were nothing but nice and apologetic to me.

    We had a load of hurt come down on our country and we are watching our backs. Nothing wrong with that, and I am happy we are doing it. And you can use the arguement that the methods they are using are not effective. Well please suggest something. Should we do nothing?

    I hold citizen ship in the UK,US, and Colombia. Pretty varied huh? Guess I am lucky, gotta pretty good world view IMHO.

    The US does some harsh shit sometimes, but we do a lotta good stuff too. Stop trolling, stop being an AC.

    I gotta tell you somehing as well. These days more BLACK people have asked me if I was an arab. Trying be a computer geek who is in radioshack buying wire when a big black man says"lookit at ol bin lades kid getting his shit for a bomb, damn, you aint gonna blow me up, just where in the hell or you from"

    Man, got me all pissed on a friday night.

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  6. No, it won't. by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "My guess is that the detectors are set to "go off" even if the tiniest amount of radiation is found. That way, any attempt by terrorists to try to hide the radiation (thick lead, etc) will be thwarted."

    If anything, all those false positives will make it easier to sneak in a nuclear or radiological device. When the alarms are going off every day you tend not to be as attentive as you would be otherwise, and the personnel involved won't exactly give a thorough search.

    How did 12/7/41 and 9/11/01 happen? Too much information gathering, not enough information interpretation. And from the looks of this, we're setting ourselves up for more of the same.

    1. Re:No, it won't. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're assuming they don't treat each radioactive case with the utmost care. It sounds like they are. I'm sorry, when someone comes through and sets off radioactive alarms, I just doubt the subway workers are going to get all ho-hum about it. "Aww, you look like a cancer patient, go ahead."

      It's human nature - if there are anough false positives, an alarm will be disregarded, radiation or no.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:No, it won't. by mbogosian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And we all know that these could have been prevented if we had just stripsearched radioactive subway-goers.

      Okay, to whomever modded me down on this...it's supposed to be sarcastic (sorry I forgot my <sarcasm/> tags, but take a look at the context)....

  7. Oh great. by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tiny amounts of radiation in catshit in a landfill is too much, even though its probably full of smoke so detectors. So.... FLUSH it, so it ends up in the septic tank, runs out through the leach bed into the ditch, down to the creek and into Lake Ontario.

    Fucking brilliant.

    --
    This space available.
  8. Re:Radiation levels by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What! You really think they thought about this? No. They just put them in to make themselves and the public at large feel 'safer'.

    NOTE: The 2 minute delay between posting sucks.

  9. Re:how about... by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thank you for the link.
    The idea that the Transportation Safety folks now keep a list of people to subject to intense search bothers me not at all.
    The idea that one can get on that list simply for being politically distasteful to the Bush Administration is appalling.
    The idea that nobody is willing to admit how this list is compiled or how one disputes being on it is terrifying.
    When government declares that it is no longer accountable to the people it governs, then it has lost the legitimacy of that office.
    I would compare this to McCarthy but McCarthy and his cronies weren't anywhere near this effective.
    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  10. Re:My question is... by mbogosian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let me guess: you don't live in Manhattan.

    Apparently, the doctors don't live there either:

    From the article: But even in the best-case scenario, a patient will have to wait while the contents of the letter are verified, say the doctors. "They may choose not to use public transportation to avoid this inconvenience," they write.

    Try navigating Manhattan efficiently without public transportation.

  11. Re:Radiation levels by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you're just interested in terror, you could carry a bottle of some powdered radioisotope. They're not really that hard to come by. Sprinkle it on the subway. Random subway cars, station benches, wherever.

    Soon as the news hits that the New York subway system is contaminated with radioactive material, there will be panic, regardless of amount. And it wouldn't take a very big container of material to do it, either.

    Tremendous amounts of fear; no bomb required. Remember when there was anthrax in the mail? You can scare a lot of people without any explosions.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  12. Re:My question is... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I get it,... so we are supposed to wait until they do have a nuke and use it before we take measures to protect ourselves?

    Did you read it? Try consider it a priority of known threats vs. theoretical threats. Or a case for balance. Or a rearrangeing of order of operations, as a gaping present day vulnerability is apparent.

    Conventional bombs are a known threat, so why don't we make sure that the weapons detectors can sniff those out _first_ and _now_, and then once those systems are installed, worry about weapons that these people might, in theory, develop or aquire a few years in the future? So far, all that I have read that they have installed is rad detectors, which is useless against easily made and easily aquired conventional bombs, and the only thing they've managed to do with it is harass cancer patients, when conventional bombs could be passing through there every day.

    My case is also for turning down the meter sensitivity just a tad as it sounds like the level it trips at is not that far above natural radiation.

    Was your grandfather in charge of Pearl Harbour's defenses by chance?

    No, but it's not relevant. The world was very different then, but that was still another interesting case of political bungling of people not having the right priorities and systematically poor foreign policies, it's not a newly developed problem.

  13. Re:Wake Up! Coward by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I gotta tell you somehing as well. These days more BLACK people have asked me if I was an arab. Trying be a computer geek who is in radioshack buying wire when a big black man says"lookit at ol bin lades kid...

    So why does the ethnicity of the racist asshole who made this comment matter? Racists exist in all races. Why does this suprise you?

    Similar to the issues raised in the disscusion on the spammer who was complaining about too much spam, some people have no empathy. They can't understand that their actions are wrong even if they've gone or are going through the same thing.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  14. This is getting ridiculous! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Al Quaida got EXACTLY what they wanted on 9/11/2001! Granted, a few thousand died that day..and a couple of buildings went down...but since then lives have been made miserable for MILLIONS...which is exactly what they wanted to to to us! Our freedoms have been curtailed at the airport..like they'll ever try that again..If they did, they'd be thrown out the window by an entire pissed off airplane. The old ideas of hijacking were to comply with the hijackers' demands...but not any more!! Now we have cancer patients being strip searched whose only crime is taking the subway. We have TV cameras looking at us everywhere, connected up to facial reckognization systems. We have more freedoms curtailed since World War II and unlike the ones then, these loss of freedoms are permanent. Yes, the terrorists got exactly what they wanted..a shift in the United States' citizens' right to freedom. The irony is that the REAL terrorists are Bush and Ashcroft and Congress who've perverted this awful event for their own political ends.

  15. Re:My question is... by maxpublic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This whole line of reasoning is a crock of horseshit, e.g., "oooh, we need to protect our subways from evil nuke-toting terrorists!"

    Let's examine this, shall we? Any terrorist organization with the resources and intelligence to get something like a suitcase-sized nuclear device into the United States quite probably isn't brain-dead enough to tote the thing through a secured installation wired to detect the bomb.

    Although it appears some of my more idiotic countrymen think that very thing could happen. Forget the easily-made and easily-transported conventional explosives and poisonous gases - think of those nukes!

    9/11 has apparently lobotomized more than a few people.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  16. Just stay out of the subway by lommer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly, all this will do is cause an unholy incovenience to cancer patients such that it gets into the media, at which point any self respecting terrorist who can do a bit of research will figure out that he should just avoid the subways.

    Duh.

  17. Re:My question is... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The best I've read they can do is just make a "dirty" bomb...

    And if they did make a "dirty" bomb, why the fuck would they set it off in the subway? It seems that if you're going to wreak havoc in a subway, you want to take advantage of the fact that it is a closed space, which would imply a biological attack (consider how many people touch the poles in the car, or at least brush them as they walk in) or a gas attack (ala Aum cult in Tokyo). Setting off a dirty bomb in a subway would just be stupid, the tunnel collapses and then where is your radiation? Underground.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  18. Re:how about... by Galvatron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First of all, given the number of people flying, yes, of course some people are going to end up as statistical anomolies. Also, people have a tendancy to remember annoying events. Try actually writing down each time you get searched when boarding the plane, and see if it is actually 80%. Finally, if it bothers you, try waiting until the plane is about to close the doors before boarding. It's just as confortable to wait in the airport as on the plane, and they don't delay departures to search the last few people who board.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  19. How to smuggle U235 /P238 in the subway by aepervius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Easy. Just don't eat for a week or so as to get a terrible face, don't sleep either. Then shave completly your head. Your face will be gaunt and you *will* looks like a cancer patient. Then wait that a few false alarm happen in the media, go in the subway.

    When the alarm sound have some faked paper about a cancer treatment by radiation. When the guy come to you jsut show the paper. Chance are that in a year or so after so much false alarm they let you thru after seeing you (now really bad looking and not looking like a terrorist).

    Think the scenario is far etched ? Think again. Human can also be pavlov trained to ignore false alarm if they come too often. That is why setting a detection level in an alarm is a science in itself.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  20. Re:My question is... by Fat+Casper · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Conventional bombs are a known threat, so why don't we make sure that the weapons detectors can sniff those out _first_ and _now_, and then once those systems are installed, worry about weapons that these people might, in theory, develop or aquire a few years in the future?

    Silly person, it's not about safety. This last year has simply been a power grab by the police while wafing a safety flag in our faces. The only improvement in actual security occurred on flight 93. Taking off our shoes, having our email read and watching cancer patients get dragged off the streets is just our way of lying to ourselves and giving Ashcroft everything he wants.

    --
    I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  21. Chemo? Gamma not ionizing? by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's interesting.. but what does chemotherapy have to do with radiation treatment?

    And for the grandparent post... if you really think gamma radiation is not ionizing, and want to go telling the world that, go hang out with some gamma emitters for a while first, THEN come tell us how it passes harmlessly through things.

    Alpha & Beta radiation, outside the body, cause radiation damage primarily in the skin. The higher the energy, the further they penetrate, of course. Gamma radiation, however, will pass right through you, causing damage to your internal organs along the way.

    What is ionizing radiation?

    Gamma radiation is VERY ionizing. Why do you think it causes cancer? Why do you think it casues radiation poisoning in high doses? What do you think radiation poisoning is?

  22. Re:Al Queda's new weapon by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 5, Insightful

    tswinzig wrote:

    > Too low? I'd say the detectors are working just
    > right. Yeah it sucks for these patients, but they
    > can work this out.

    Those patients have rights! They should not be stripped searched because they are receiving treatment for a terminal illness. They should not have to carry papers to prove to the police that they are not terrorists. And they should not be barred from using public transportation.

    > I'd much rather have a few false positives than
    > possibly miss a dirty bomb shielded in lead.

    If a dirty bomb was properly shielded, it wouldn't give a true positive (though there are far easier nukes to shield). The police would be busy strip searching cancer patients while the terrorists walked on through. I'm actually surprised with all the pollution from nuclear testing in the fifties and sixties that any detector could work reliably without giving off tons of false positives.

    Perhaps everyone should just ride the subways (fly in airplanes, etc.) in their birthday suits. But that might violate your rights, which might induce you to care.

    As for the mean terrorists: if they play with nuclear fire, they are gonna get burned, big time. That's what the Red Bamboo found out in 1966, the hard way.

    "Once we wake Godzilla, he'll take care of those guys."
    Ichiro "Godzilla, Ebira, Mothra: Big Duel in the South Sea" (Japanese version, 1966)

    As it was before, may it be again. Grant us this, Godzilla! ("Godzilla March")