Studying Avalanches A Little Too Closely
Makarand writes "ABC News has
an interesting
article about a Professor in
Montana State University who is trying to
perfect avalanche prediction techniques. He studies
avalanches using the 'direct method,' i.e. he
sets off an avalanche and puts himself right
ahead of it so that he gets buried alive, a routine he has been doing for 20 years now.
His goal is to be able to use data about the climate, mountain topography and snow microstructure in a model to forecast if we
are prone to avalanche conditions."
Isn't natural selection supposed to take guys like this out of the gene pool?
he sets off an avalanche and puts himself right ahead of it so that he gets buried alive
Sounds like studying spam by giving out your e-mail address in an EFNet warez channel...
Or submitting a story with a link to the site you run off your DSL connection to Slashdot, and then trying to surf the 'net...
As a serious scientist, I'm worried that having the same person buried again and again will skew the results of this study.
I have a short list here that will help fix this otherwise wonderful experiment.
Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!