Slashdot Mirror


Act On Total Information Awareness

pberry writes "The EFF Action Center has two new alerts (1, 2) on stopping "Total Information Awareness." TIA is a collection of DARPA-funded initiatives that are very scary. The project is headed by Admiral John Poindexter and has no implementation guidelines thus far. In other words, it is misguided to say that these tools will be used in any particular way, but it is clear that if they do what they say they will, America could be a very scary place to live."

8 of 55 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Get a life.... by eglamkowski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except that when al Qaida and Saddam are just faint memories, we'll still have TIA lying around looking for a purpose.

    Minority Report?

    --
    Government IS the problem.
  2. Get Your War (At Home) On by rocketfairy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    from http://www.mnftiu.cc/mnftiu.cc/war17.html :

    "When John Pointdexter speaks, is there still that flashing sign above his head that says, 'ALERT: I am a lying sack-of-shit felon'?"

    Sure, he helped sell arms to Iran in order to fund right-wing terrorists in Nicaragua. Sure, he lied under oath to the public while doing it. But that's no reason not to, uh, give him the keys to one of the most comprehensive, militarized systems to spy on the entire citizenry of the USA with no judicial review whatsoever. After all, in this post-911 world, everything has changed.

    1. Re:Get Your War (At Home) On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But he swore an oath, an officer's loyalty oath, to uphold and defend the precepts outlined in the Constitution of the United States of America. An oath he probably swore to God, how could we not believe him? Aside from that whole, I lied to use the power of the citizenry of the US to murder people and provide militant islamic forces with the latest in man portable missle technology thing of course.

      You've got to love republican logic: "Lying about who gives you blow jobs means you're unfit to be President. Lying about the fact that you essentially hire thugs to murder people because you don't like who runs their country, and got that money by selling advanced weapon systems to people who list among their intrests 'burning America in effigy' is the mark of a president great enough for mount rushmore. And anyone who lies for him, in the interests of concealing these illegal acts, is a hero, despite the oaths they took to never do anything like that."

  3. The furor over TIA boils down to one question. by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you a patriot, or are you a terrorist?

    Because if you're not with us, you're against us.

    And if you're not a patriot, you're a terrorist.

    A patriot has nothing to hide from his [sic] Country. A patriot is glad, glad with all his heart to hear that his country is taking the initiative, a patriot supports the party -- if the party wants to know whom Sam or Sally is speaking with, let the party know. If the party wants to know where every Citizen is, what every Citizen does, what every Citizen knows, then let the party know.

    A patriot believes. A patriot is the opposite of the dissident.

    A patriot does not support laws that allow terrorists, those who do not believe in the strength and ideals of our country, to hide behind anonymity. A patriot does not support anarchy, the total chaos that results when you allow dissidents to mess with public awareness, to spread their lies about our country.

    And a patriot does not call for public hearings, checks and balances, handcuffs to hold the hand of Justice, to keep our men [sic] in uniforms -- who believe -- from doing what they believe in, what Americans -- real Americans, not bleeding-heart-liberals need for their protection.

    A patriot does not question.

    You're either with us, or against us.

    If you're not a patriot, you're a terrorist.

    I guess I'm a terrorist.

  4. No You get a CLUE.... by isotope23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ask yourself why 9/11 happened. It happened because the USA is poking its nose into other countries affairs.

    You want the best way to stop another 9/11? Stop funding things like this : the School of the Americas Did you know that literally EVERY right wing coup which took place in South America over the past 50-60 years was led by a graduate from this place? It's graduates include such stellar persons as Manuel Noriega.

    Now think about this, let's say China occupied Washington D.C. Would that piss you off? Well, take that analogy and multiply by a thousand to get an idea of how pissed some muslims might be that we are in their holiest land of Mecca...

    Now throw in the fact that we gave Israel roughly $11,000.00 total per PERSON since 1949 :

    Peace Facts And yet we tell the world we are unbiased.

    And some people here honestly wonder WHY others hate us????? We support corrupt regimes like Saudia Arabia, when it is in our interest. Why is Iran pissed at us, take a look at the Shah's corrupt regime. In addition, we GAVE Saddam his Bio Terror weapons stock back in the 80's to help him against Iran during their war. Don't believe that? Look it up. During the Reagan era we sent them bio weapons cultures, which at the time even some of the administration questioned.

    You don't need to shred the constitution to protect America, Just go back to the strict "Friend to all, Ally to none" vision upon which America was founded.

    But hey, who am I? Just someone who'll get rounded up the first time they go through asking : "Papers Please." I'm sure you'll be unscathed and blissfully unaware watching that latest Survivor Episode. Until they come for You.

    America's New Motto?

    "One Flag To Rule Them All....."

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  5. To use the dumbness of an earlier troll... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 5, Insightful


    It's been almost completely concluded that 9/11 happened because of US Intelligence failures.

    Yeah, an intelligence failure like this? Or this? Or this? Or this? As opposed to the US Gov planning to invade Afghanistan before 9-11, to get a nice fat oil pipeline in there, and thus pissing off Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia being the country that almost all the highjackers came from, and the country funding Al Q'aida (sp?), and... err... the country supplying a very large portion of the USA's oil needs.

    This TIA thing is research into how to improve it and prevent another 9/11.

    War is good for business; there's arms manufacturers to please. George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four has a good explanation, written by "Emannuel Goldstein"(sp?). It is also a nice handy tool to crush dissent. A simplistic example would be the way Ford in the UK filtered out, with the help of the government, "subversives" from job applicants, for fear of union activity. Now we all know how much the US Corporate Government loves worker's unions!

    It has nothing to do with spying on anyone. And everything to do with spying on everyone, collectively. Googling for dissenters, if you will.

    Try this: The disinfo quiz. And this: The ACLU Quiz.

    The only intelligence failure in this world is that of the people happy to just sit on their lazy ignorant arses and be spoonfed the "news" by their governments and Big Corps, instead of taking a few minutes to find out what's really going on.

    Sorry if I've hurt anyones delicate idealistic feelings, but it has to be said.

    Ali

  6. Ask Security Services to deny this: by Garry+Anderson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why has NOBODY asked the Security Services the following? I have posted this argument several times before.

    Ask Security Services in the US, UK, Indonesia (Bali) or anywhere for that matter, to deny this:

    Internet surveillance, using Echelon, Carnivore or back doors in encryption, will not stop terrorists communicating by other means - most especially face to face or personal courier.

    Terrorists will have to do that, or they will be caught.

    Perhaps using mobile when absolutely essential, saying - "Meet you in the pub Monday" (human bomb to target A), or Tuesday (target B) or Sunday (abort).

    The Internet has become a tool for government to snoop on their people - 24/7.

    The terrorism argument is a dummy - total bull*.

    INTERNET SURVEILLANCE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STOP TERRORISTS - THAT IS SPIN AND PROPAGANDA

    This propaganda is for several reasons, including: a) making you feel safer b) to say the government are doing something and c) the more malicious motive of privacy invasion.

    Government say about surveillance - "you've nothing to fear - if you are not breaking the law"

    This argument is made to pressure people into acquiescence - else appear guilty of hiding something illegal.

    It does not address the real reason why they want this information (which they will deny) - they want a surveillance society.

    They wish to invade your basic human right to privacy. This is like having somebody watching everything you do - all your personal thoughts, hopes and fears will be open to them.

    This is everything - including phone calls and interactive TV. Quote from ZDNET: "Whether you're just accessing a Web site, placing a phone call, watching TV or developing a Web service, sometime in the not to distant future, virtually all such transactions will converge around Internet protocols."

    "Why should I worry? I do not care if they know what I do in my own home", you may foolishly say. Or, just as dumbly, "They will not be interested in anything I do".

    This information will be held about you until the authorities need it for anything at all. Like, for example, here in UK when government looked for dirt on individuals of Paddington crash survivors group. It was led by badly injured Pam Warren. She had over 20 operations after the 1999 rail crash (which killed 31 and injured many).

    This group had fought for better and safer railways - all by legal means. By all accounts a group of fine outstanding people - with good intent.

    So what was their crime, to deserve this investigation? It was just for showing up members of government to be the incompetents they were.

    As usual, government tried to put a different spin on the story when they were found out. Even so, their intent was obvious - they wanted to use this information as propaganda - to smear the character of these good people.

    Our honourable government would rather defile the character of its citizens, rather than address their reasonable concerns.

    The government arrogantly presume this group of citizens would not worry about having their privacy invaded.

    They can also check your outgoings match your income and that you are paying enough tax. What do you think all this privacy invasion is for? The War on Terrorism? You poor dupe. All your finances for them to scrutinize; heaven help you if you cannot account for every cent.

    The authorities try make everything they say sound perfectly reasonable.

    e.g. Officials from US Defence Department agency have said that they want, "the same level of accountability in cyberspace that we now have in the physical world".

    Do government currently keep records of everything that you touch in the physical world to analyse?

    No they do not - So then, is that the same level of accountability?

    They wish to keep an electronic tag on you, like some kind of animal. Actually it is even worse than this - like some pervert sex offender that they have to keep track of. Would any person of intelligence call that accountability?

    Do not believe the lies of Government - even more of your money spent on these measures will not protect us from terrorists. Every argument they use is subterfuge - pure spin.

    In UK, the RIP Act is unjust - dim-witted ill-informed MPs believed governments 'experts'. Remember - they will get everything about you, your phone calls, emails, TV viewing - everything.

    Americans - the Total Information Awareness plan, USA Patriot act and Homeland Defence - you are more technologically aware, are you really that easily led?

    I cannot stress enough - all your personal thoughts, hopes and fears will be open to them. I know from experience, as fact, they have no morals and will purposefully twist this information to use against you. I have documentary evidence of this - actual government agency case notes. Should government take legal action to deny that they pervert how personal information is used, then these documents may be viewed in a court of Law.

    P.S. The United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization and the United States Department of Commerce are hiding the simple solution to trademark and domain name problem. The solution was ratified by honest attorneys. Please visit my site - not associated with United Nations WIPO.org. The United Nations WIPO deal with these conflicts - but are without honour and too cowardly to directly answer my easy questions (as are the US DoC).

  7. Here are the technical details. Looks buildable by NetBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    EPIC has the system description here:
    http://www.epic.org/privacy/profiling/tia/t iasyste mdescription.pdf

    It doesn't look like rocket science to me. Nor does it look like "just an idea".
    This is as good a blueprint as could be.

    What do people (esp ISP's and ecommerce types)
    think about the infrastructure? Anything look familiar?

    Bear in mind that if DARPA does not build it, then
    the various marketing groups will. It's only a
    matter of time and it probably cannot be stopped.

    It might, however, be possible to influence the
    degree of "fairness" with which it is applied. Will it only watch immigrants, felons, sex
    offenders, arabs, blacks, jews and poor women or
    will Rich White Men be watched too?

    Different kinds of justice, what works efficiently and what is "fair". If there is an issue for
    the /. community, that NO ONE ELSE UNDERSTANDS,
    this database surveillance is it.