Googling For Dates?
JAK writes "The New York Times' down-to-earth ethicist Randy Cohen writes on the moral implications of searching for a date's past on Google. He suggests that the practice is ok (even admitting to doing it himself) but warns against jumping to conclusions based on a quick search or confusing someone for others with the same name. He also writes that "the verb ''to Google'' is now a familiar neologism" (neologism: a new word, usage, or expression, I looked it up).
You can read about it The Times (free reg blah blah)"
ze first!
I = ruel!
"... He also writes that the verb ''to Google'' is now a familiar neologism" (neologism: a new word, usage, or expression, I looked it up).
Thanks for the tip, brainiac.
NB: Most of your readers have twice the vocabulary of any two members of the Slashdot team.
We have no life, existing in a former empire and making lame In SOVIET RUSSIA commnets. We suck so hard that people hate us and it inspirers mass trolling. Go shove your lame stupid feeble attempts at humor and go fuck yourself. /. commnets continues
--The campain against lame
You must be a slashdot editor, going by your spelling.
Code 1007 - Disappearing a dead hooker from CowboyNeal's shack
I'm a hamker. Hams, hackers, same ethos, different medium. == 73 de KB0STG
In Soviet Russia, lame slashdot comments YOU.
Google won't find anything beyond the charade an individual has created on a home page...or makes up in a blog, for that matter.
...$17.95 per month (and up) will get you a lot more information than some skim-the-surface search engine. If you're really into finding out about someone, subscribe to one of several online investigation services...that's where the real dirt is.
Mr. Cohen's article sounds more like an advertisement for google, than a holiday tip for the lovelorn.
What I want to know is, do we still need the "Free Reg, bla bla" reminder everytime an NYT article is posted? Don't we all get it by now?
python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
If you want to see something really funny check out Phroggy's website at phroggy.com. Haha, what a loser! No wonder he has to troll for dates among underage chat girls with low self-esteem...
I have moderator points, but where's the "+1 Southpark reference" modifier?
Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
Thanks a lot for pointing out neologism. If /. will start explaining every single three-syllable word, that will be highly appreciated by the people selling you bandwith.