DOD vs. 802.11b
goombah99 writes "The NY times (reg required) reports that "The Defense Department, arguing that an increasingly popular form of wireless Internet access could interfere with military radar, is seeking new limits on the technology". It would seem they have a good point; radar is an essential for both defense and civilian aviation as well as ship navigation in tight quarters. Critics of the restrictions contend technology can limit the interference, but what proof is there to these assertions? Sure we all want wireless internet but maybe there should be more careful review of its consequences."
Yay! LAN parties, books, food, karate. Woo! Merry Christmas, everyone!
fp even!
HURD SUCKS! No PS/2 mice support!
1st Post
FP MOD me UP dammit!
Alcohol and tobacco kill people.
Pornography does not.
How in the name of Greyskull do I get Linux 8.2 to recognize and allow access to my 128-bit encrypted wireless (802.11.x) network? (I'm using Mandrake)
PS. RMS could kick your ass!
yah, i aman athiest, but aren't religions supposed to teach tolerance and acceptance? I mean come on my whole family is religious and i deal with it, if it offends you, ignore it or embrace it
Just imagine, Sadam buying boat loads of 802.11(a/b) access point and put it around Iraq to confuse his enemy radar and guided missles