Slashdot Mirror


Quicktime 6 Becoming Mobile-Phone Standard?

k-hell writes "It seems like Apple's QuickTime 6 is becoming standard on some 44 million Japanese mobile phones. Apple and many other companies are pressuring hard to make MPEG-4 the industry standard for video-on-demand services in 3G cellular networks, and to keep Microsoft and its proprietary Windows Media out of the mobile phones market."

18 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. For more information... by tigress · · Score: 5, Informative

    See this link.

  2. It's about MP4, not Quicktime 6 by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Informative

    MPEG-4 is the open standard that they're adopting. That Quicktime 6 has support for MPEG-4 is incidental, and not at all the core issue. After all, if the mobile phones actually supported Quicktime, they'd be able to play a lot more than just MPEG-4.

    1. Re:It's about MP4, not Quicktime 6 by MrMickS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple fought a battle to have Quicktime 6 adopted as MPEG4. This covers more than just the codecs used for compression, but the file formats as well.

      The first article says that DoCoMo are going to be using Quicktime rather than just MPEG4 and that Apple have worked with them to produce the necessary software. Yes, MPEG4 is an open standard but in this case at least it's Apple's implementation that's being used.

      The important point is that here we have a company that's looked beyond the MS option to deliver a solution. This adoption of Quicktime should help maintain the pressure on MS to bring Windows Media to the standards party. There are some good features in WM regarding DRM (which is necessary so please no flame war on this point).

      A unified media format would be of benefit to consumers and third parties alike.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    2. Re:It's about MP4, not Quicktime 6 by DebianDog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quicktime will play about anything but if you want to replay MPEG-2 you need to upgrade.
      click here for all QT supported formats next to Cleaner Quicktime Pro is the best format converter out there!

    3. Re:It's about MP4, not Quicktime 6 by DeeKay · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, QT plays just about anything that doesn't involve rigorous patents or huge licensing fees!
      For MPEG2 you need to upgrade unfortunately, that's correct.. And some Indeo-Codecs also don't work because they're covered by Intels Patents! Other than that, QT plays any AVI that uses official M$-Codecs! I even was very pleasantly surprised to find it could play my 6 year old .FLC files from 3D Studio 4 (DOS!) without a hitch!
      Then again, there seem to be some really old .MOVs (and .QTs!) that will not work with current Quicktime Players! Now THAT is really lame! ;-)
      For pr0n-mpegs VLC (OSX only) works perfectly for me (also (S)VCD!), and Mplayer for OS X has incredibly broad codec-support, even WMA (and certain WMV/ASF-subsets!) plus that Indeo Codec from above! ;-)
      The latest version is really nice, with sleek GUI!.. I miss the advanced settings and information though that are available on the commandline!

  3. Re:QuickTime vs Windows Media by Kinniken · · Score: 3, Informative

    So how is QuickTime any less of a proprietary format than Windows Media? Is it just because QT happens to play MPEG-4 video as well QT video? QT does not "happen to play MPEG4", it uses MPEG4 as its "main" format. In fact, I believe the Quicktime file format (the wrappers, not the codec) was choosen by whatever consortium is in charge of MPEG4 as the official file format. Don't get it wrong... the adoption of MPEG4 by mobile phones is a victory for Open Standards - and only secondarily for QT, which now relies on them as well.

    --
    What do you know about World Politic? Find out in this quiz
  4. yes,propriatry Apple is better then propritary MS! by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't act like apple is some kind champion of open standards or something, they've been trying to cram QuickTime down everyone throats for years... and while the format itself may be open, some of the codecs are not (Sorensen Anyone?).

    A lot of my dislike of QuickTime has to do with their shitty, buggy, windows viewer program (after all this time it still can't do full screen, wtf!?). But in all seriousness I know my life would be a lot nicer if everyone used truly open, independent file formats and codecs.

    Apple is just as guilty of playing the proprietary crap game in terms of video as Microsoft, if not more so.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  5. Re:What to do!? by Pathwalker · · Score: 5, Informative

    You know - once you install QuickTime, you don't have to use the player Apple provides.

    They have full documentation available on the file format, and programming applications that use it for both MacOS as well as windows.
    Heck - when I visited developer.apple.com to pick up the links, their ad was for a 5 volume set of books on writing programs that use QuickTime.

    So, if you don't like it, download the docs, and write your own.

  6. Incredibly misleading headline (again) by robla · · Score: 5, Informative
    Time to cut and paste my response from a couple of days ago...

    The headline should be "3GPP Becoming Mobile-Phone Standard", and it's not all that surprising, but it's very good news for everyone (including RealNetworks, where I'm from). We've been doing a lot of work in the 3GPP, and it's great to see that work paying dividends. If you really want to find out what this stuff is about, look at the spec (and yes, I hate the fact that these are Word docs in zipfiles as much as anyone).

    Much of the confusion around this subject comes from a lack of understanding of the difference between .mov, .mp4, and .3gp. DoCoMo's announcement was good news for 3GPP, and given the support throughout the Helix platform for 3GPP formats, codecs, and protocols, we view it as great news for the Helix Community.

    As another poster pointed out, only a piece of 3GPP is based on Quicktime is the container file format itself (the bit that says "here's a 3000 byte chunk of data with this 32bit codec identifier"). Another piece (the protocol) is based on work RealNetworks pioneered (RTSP). Moreover, the Helix DNA Client supports the 3GPP specification today.

    RealNetworks added MPEG-4 and 3GPP support 10 months ago with the RealSystem Mobile Server (see press release),
    and MPEG-4 support will be included in the Helix DNA Server when it is released in the near future.

    As for the speculation about Apple releasing 3GPP encoding support, we would welcome them to the party. In early November we announced that a version of our Producer product for creating 3GPP content will ship in Q1 of 03. (see press release) Moreover, we offer our encoding framework as open source (and naturally open APIs) so that you can add support for whatever format you want to. We've given you a head start by implementing Ogg Vorbis support.

    Again, the new phones sound great. Lots of new devices for Helix encoders and servers to work with.

    1. Re:Incredibly misleading headline (again) by makapuf · · Score: 2, Informative

      DUH ! 3GPP IS a mobile standardization body !

      Thus, it should be a mobile phone standard (and it is, if you count the hundreds of millions of GSM phones, which standards are being defined by the 3gpp group now)

  7. Re:OK, let's share experiences by Des+Herriott · · Score: 4, Informative

    You might want to check your facts...

    1) As has already been pointed out, they didn't choose Quicktime, they chose MPEG-4.

    2) Windows load times are utterly irrelevant to this discussion since we're talking about mobile phones here.

    3) The latest version of MPlayer for Linux will play Quicktime (or more accurately, the Sorenson 3 codec), as well as RealVideo9 and WMA9.

  8. 3GPP, not MPEG-4 by robla · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's even more misleading than you give it credit for. MPEG-4 is a very big spec, of which the ".mp4" part is only a small chunk. DoCoMo announced 3GPP support, which takes some parts from MPEG-4, but takes other parts from IETF and ITU specs.

    Regarding Ogg + MPEG-4 video. The licensing terms for MPEG-4 Video are pretty gnarly. How about Ogg and H.263+ (which, incidently, is what the 3GPP standardized on). That combination nearly works today in Helix DNA Client. We're already committed to making this available in our mainline products like RealOne Player and Helix Universal Server.

  9. Re:Filter by Editor? by Make · · Score: 2, Informative

    sure you can if you're logged in

  10. Re:yes,propriatry Apple is better then propritary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    (after all this time it still can't do full screen, wtf!?).

    They make you upgrade to Quicktime Pro. The free player doesn't play full screen.

  11. Re:What fun! by Emmettfish · · Score: 4, Informative
    ^^ Listen to this man, for he invented Ogg Vorbis.

    Hate to disappoint, but I didn't. Ogg Vorbis is the invention of Christopher Montgomery, our technical director. I'm just the paperwork monkey, gadabout and bon-vivant that runs the company. Xiph produces Ogg Vorbis (and a laundry list of other cool stuff), though.

    Emmett Plant
    CEO, Xiph.Org Foundation

  12. Which Mpeg4 standard? Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I advised a colleague in Hong Kong to buy a digital camera with Mpeg4 video.
    I said, "Yes, Mpeg4 is good. It's a standard supported by Real & QT, and is meant to be a standard format like MP3. Although MS WMP will not play them, as they have their own proprietary version of something similar."

    So he bought the camera. It says Mpeg4 on it. And nothing will play the files except WMP. The file name extension isn't mp4. QT couldn't play it or import it. Real - which apparently will now play all the formats - won't play it either.

    Looks like it's going to be a successful format - 2 incompatible formats using the same product moniker.

    1. Re:Which Mpeg4 standard? Caveat Emptor by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Informative

      if the camera in question was that JVC abomination he shouldn't have been surprised - the whole thing is an MS stitch-up. I was fairly intrigued about it until I read the brochure. I just shook my head at another missed opportunity as I deleted the .pdf.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  13. The Real Deal on MPEG4 by democritus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since there seems to be so much confusion about Quicktime 6 and MPEG4.

    Quicktime is not a codec, it's a framework. Much like DirectShow in Windows, it's the video conduit of MacOS.

    Quicktime is also a file format. This file format (usually .mov or .qt) is just a container. It has preferred codec. Think of it as the equivalent of .avi in Windows. In the past, it was common that the codec was some variant of Sorenson. Since Quicktime 6, the standard is ISO MPEG4.

    "Quicktime files" can contain and of a myriad of codecs just like AVIs can. One of these is MPEG4, of which there are a plethora of partially compatible codecs, like DIVX, MS MPEG4, Xvid and ISO MPEG4.

    The MPEG people have decided that the universal MPEG4 format should be called .mp4 and be a Quicktime container file with AAC audio and ISO MPEG4 compatible video. These are all open, documented standards (even the Quicktime file format) that anyone can use assuming they're willing to license the patents, just like for MPEG1 and MPEG2.

    Hope this clears this all up for those of you unwilling to do two seconds of research.