MPAA Countersues 321 Studios
Squash writes "321 Studios, makers of DVD X-Copy, is being Counter-sued by the MPAA. You may remember them filing suit to allow thier software to be produced and sold. Interesting point: the MPAA wants to claim all profits from sales of the software, which is now being bundled with some DVD burners."
that the MPAA was suing three-hundred and twenty one different studios?
Why not fork?
IMO, they made a mistake with the name. DVD-X-Copy is, obviously, intended to make illegal copies. DVD-X-Backup, on the other hand, would obviously be intended to make legal, fair-use, backups.
Darwin works for companies & products as well
If Slashdot was elected president in 2000, we wouldn't have the two problems we have today: A MPAA and more lawyers than doctors.
MPAA actually only sued 57 studios, but a few of them were unusually big.
If the laws that you've bought and paid for don't actually work like they're supposed to, does that mean you can get your money back?
--
"say no to feeping creaturism"
Paul "Say no to feeping creaturism"
You know, someone just asked me if there was software that would let you copy DVDs. They wanted to...(wait for it...) use a copy for the DVD player in their Honda odyssey so they could keep the orignals at home and undamaged (kids, minivans and optical discs don't play well together).
I told them there was no such software.
Now I know differently. Thanks, MPAA, I guess you do add value, after all!
Fermat's other theorem: "I have a simple proof, but I can't write it down as I fear it's a DMCA violation to discuss it"
What the hell does this have to do with the DMCA, XdvdCopy, or anything eles that has to do with technology?
This is the way the world ends, not with a bang , but a wimper
Your two-year-old can eat DVDs?
With dVDs and CDs being non-biodegradeable, I think we need to employ your children on a far larger scale.
Blearf. Blearf, I say.