Sendo Accuses MS of Stealing Smartphone IP
Nate B. writes "According this article in The Inquirer, it seems that Sendo, a UK based development house, has filed suit in Texas as of December 23 to recoup monetary damages for IP it claims Microsoft stole. From the article, 'The company's grievance is that after years of working closely with Microsoft on the development of Windows Smartphone 2002, the fruits of their endeavours were handed straight over to HTC, which manufactures the SPV handset for Orange.' The story also includes this cute footnote, 'When Sendo announced it was to receive funding from Microsoft, I and some other British journalists asked Sendo's Hugh Brogan at the press briefing, in the London Waldorf, whether he wasn't afraid that the company might just take its information and then dump his firm. He claimed then there was no possibility of that.'" Seems there was more to this story than originally thought.
Sendo & Microsoft - it all ends in tears
Small handset manufacturer sues giant
By Tony Dennis: Tuesday 24 December 2002, 11:25
AS EXPECTED and as I predicted in November, handset manufacturer, Sendo, has taken the world's largest software house, Microsoft, to court in Texas, USA (23rd December).
The company's grievance is that after years of working closely with Microsoft on the development of Windows Smartphone 2002, the fruits of their endeavours were handed straight over to HTC, which manufactures the SPV handset for Orange.
HTC, like Via Technology and Nanya, is a subsidiary of the mighty Formosa Plastics combine.
Microsoft's own Web site hails the SPV as the first handset to run its Smartphone software even though technically speaking Sendo's own Z100 was launched before the SPV.
Sendo's immediate reaction was to stop work on the Z100 and announce that it would licence the rival, Symbian based, Series 60 platform from Nokia. At the original launch of the Z100, Ron Schaeffer, head of Sendo's product development team, had told the INQUIRER that as a small company, Sendo "didn't have the development dollars" to produce both a Symbian and a Windows Smartphone version of the Z100.
Now it appears the company has decided to go to court to recoup some of the money - which one source claimed was at least $40 million - spent working on Stinger (the code name for Smartphone). The court case - which Sendo described as "having merit" - will almost certainly hinge on how much of Sendo's own IPR [Intellectual Property Rights] found their way into Windows Smartphone 2002.
One of the biggest ironies is that Microsoft itself invested in Sendo which was previously just a joint venture between a Birmingham, England based management team and Chinese cordless handset manufacturer, the CCT Telecom Group.
Microsoft took a stake in Sendo which was worth around $10 million, but which was less than 10% of the privately held firm.
I HAVE A FOOTNOTE to this, writes Mike Magee. When Sendo announced it was to receive funding from Microsoft, I and some other British journalists asked Sendo's Hugh Brogan at the press briefing, in the London Waldorf, whether he wasn't afraid that the company might just take its information and then dump his firm. He claimed then there was no possibility of that. We asked this question because Microsoft had been accused of doing a similar thing with pen computers.
Information wants to be free. Sendo should have shared their work with the world so people can make products on it, others would improve it etc.