Slashdot Mirror


Single-Chip Linux Computer

goombah99 writes "Axis Computer has announced a single-chip Linux-based computer that integrates 2MB Flash, 8MB SDRAM and an Ethernet transceiver into a single chip with a 27mm x 27mm footprint. 'Just add power to the chip and you have a Linux computer with network connection.' It runs the Linux 2.4 kernel without any patches. The announcement says the chip is 'available' but the tech specs are labeled as preliminary, and the order form on the web site is broken, so it's hard to confirm if it is out yet or not. Some specifications in html and pdf are available at the company's web site."

7 of 217 comments (clear)

  1. Re:enough of the 1990 hardware!! by nick-less · · Score: 5, Informative

    but really, serial ports? parallel ports? i'm not too sure that the scsi is going to win them any points either, but what the hell. they might have well integrated a video controler, an audio controler, and a 9600 baud modem to boot!

    Well, I think they target embedded applications and not laptops here. Most embedded applications don't need sound or video capabilities and most engineers love to have serial and parallel I/O, because of their simplicity.

  2. Is shipping, and Bluetooth is avail, too by diegoq · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is available.

    The chip itself is $40. The eval board for the ETRAX 100LX is available for $299 as well as a version with bluetooth for $495.

    Finally, the order page for both of these is at https://www.axis.com/shop/technology.htm.

    --
    --Tim
  3. Re:Is it an ARM? by brejc8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It only says its a 100 MIPS processor. (Million Instructions Per Sec)
    The MIPS has 32 registers.

  4. Re:Is it an ARM? by ntp · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope, you're all wrong. It uses the CRIS architecture. See here for the architectural description.

    --
    I control the time!
  5. A MCM is not a single chip by Internet+Dog · · Score: 4, Informative

    The title is misleading. The device is a multi-chip-module, not a single chip computer. They have packaged a number of chips in a very small package, but it is not a single chip. A MCM will cost more to manufacture than a true single chip computer because it requires a ceramic substrate to be manufactured with very small trace widths connecting the chips that are placed on the substrate.

  6. No RISC by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you read the specs on the CPU carefully (which I did, a couple of years back) you discover that it is not really a RISC at all, by any definition of the term. The architecture is very similar to the VAX, in fact. They just call it a RISC because that once sounded more advanced. Today, of course, calling an architecture RISC makes it seem kind of backward, but they've been saying it long enough that it's probably too late to change.

    This is not to say that the designation means much any more... people have discovered how to make the most horrendous instruction sets (read: x86) go fast with only a million (!) extra transistors or so. This CPU doesn't have those, but what matters is that it's fast enough.

    Still, it's amusing because half the complexity of the instruction set (and a substantial parcel of the chip) will never be exercised by any compiler. It's there as a sort of homage or shrine to machines from the days when programs were written in assembly language, and machines were marketed on how fancy the instruction set was, regardless of how it slowed the machine down.

    The CDC machines were exceptional: Seymour Cray really understood. Also, in the '60s, some people at IBM built the 801, which evolved into the PowerPC. The rest of the industry didn't catch on until the Stanford RISC people made their big splash.

  7. Re:Linux in under 2MB?? by Koos+Baster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Right so. 2MB should be enough for anybody! ;-)

    Red Hat should take notice, but still it's importatn that Red Hat is just as Linux as this tiny system is. And, there is a point in Linux being able to downsize into less than 2MB. Although Desktop Linux is not and does not allow for the same applications as embedded linux, there is a real virtue in sharing the codebase between these two. (Or desktop and webserver, cluster or grid server for that matter.) Although developers may not always agree on the direction the developments should take, together they provide for an open environment that is scaleble, and in escense is very lean. This is something Microsoft can never touch upon with Windows CE/PocketPC/whatever.

    That's why I think this one-die embedded linux system is indeed a a-good-thing (tm).