Slashdot Mirror


Japan Developing Diamond-based Semiconductors

s spencer and others wrote in with submissions about Japan funding the development of diamond-based semiconductors to replace silicon chips. The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.

81 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. pentium iii by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    pentium iii=mitsubishi?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:pentium iii by checkitout · · Score: 3, Informative

      pentium iii=mitsubishi?

      For those who don't get it... mitsubishi means three diamonds in japanese.

  2. engagement present... by jkcity · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard in asia that people give mobile phones with diamonds in them as engagement rpesents, so maybe they are taking a stab at the engagement market :)>

  3. Computer Reclycing by theBunkinator · · Score: 2

    Computer recycling may have a chance after all ... how many circuits do you have to kill for an engagement ring?

  4. Hmm... by Rayonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Pentiums are a girl's best friend"?

    Okay, that's not funny. Taking off Score +1 Bonus.

  5. The girlfriend should be happy about this... by PhotonSphere · · Score: 5, Funny


    She's been pushing for a diamond for a little while now - I wonder if she'll be upset if she gets it in chip form rather than the traditional ring?

    1. Re:The girlfriend should be happy about this... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      If you put it in the ring and packaged it correctly, maybe you could use it to hold some data or open a sekrit door (ala an iButton on a signet ring mount.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The girlfriend should be happy about this... by G-funk · · Score: 2

      No, I believe the wedding ring is the one that closes various entrances, er... doors.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  6. Breakthrough by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a breakthrough in wearable computers!

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  7. Heh by ramirez · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would say "yes," but why does the ring say "Intel Inside?"

  8. if this comes through by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    Moore's Law's funeral will have to be postponed for a little while longer yet again.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:if this comes through by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

      Well, you never know when a breakthrough will come in laying down carbon atoms.

      Remember, all we need here is a flat surface not a gemstone.

      --
      It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    2. Re:if this comes through by theCat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      hmmmm...maybe. We still don't know what the raw performance of these dia-chips will be. No doubt you are thinking "oh, 1000 degC, that is great for overclocking." But do you really want the equivalent of a blast furnace on your desktop? And, what kind of logic board and surface traces will be able to manage that kind of heat? The answer is, none at all.

      These are very special duty devices. They will end up in the exhaust manifold of your car, not the logic board of your PC. They will be built and deployed to resist failure under heat, and might not run even as fast as what you can buy today; clock speed will probably not even make it into the requirements document.

      So this is no answer to Moore's Law, more like Murphy's Law; trying to get something that is far less likely to go wrong in places where traditional chips go wrong all the time. Thus we can extend the technology we know well (digital computing) into new places (harsh environments.) It will be interesting to see what they do with that...launch a compact space probe into the corona of the sun? Drop one into an erupting volcano to float around and send data? Lots of stuff comes to mind.

      But not overclocking.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  9. Disadvantages by schmink182 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The main disadvantages include the fact that diamonds are terribly expensive :)

    1. Re:Disadvantages by Apreche · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually diamonds are neither rare nor intrinsically valuable. The only reason that they cost so much at the jewelry store is because of the monopoly of debeers. They pretty much control all the diamonds in the world. if they wanted they could manufacture diamonds out of coal instead of mining them. It is not a lack of supply that makes them expensive but the fact that one company controls all the supply.

      Diamonds are expensive for the same reason that Win2k costs $200 per seat. Actually, I prefer emeralds myself.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    2. Re:Disadvantages by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Informative

      if they wanted they could manufacture diamonds out of coal instead of mining them

      Not just yet. Other companies have manufactured diamonds, but they get cloudy after a few years. When this gets solved, you'll hear about it.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Disadvantages by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Diamonds are expensive for the same reason that Win2k costs $200 per seat

      Uh, no. Artificial diamonds look wrong. And natural diamonds cannot be compared with a human product like Win2K.

    4. Re:Disadvantages by esonik · · Score: 3, Informative

      These chips will not be based on cut diamond wafers in the way today chips are based on cut silicon wafers because it's pretty much impossible to cut diamond. Rather they would be based on evaporated diamond films (like the SOI - Silicon On Insulator - technique).
      The fact that diamond is more suitable at higher temperatures is due to it's large band-gap: 5.5 eV (Si has 1.1 eV). So even at high temperature diamond is an (very good) isolator (very pure Si is also an good isolator at room temperature but it gets a lot more conductive at higher temperatures due to its small band gap). This large band-gap is also the reason why diamond would be a candidate for UV LEDs or lasers (UV starts at about 3eV). OTOH, Silicon with 1.1eV is in the infrared. BTW, the 235nm radiation they mention in the article corresponds to ~5.2 eV.

    5. Re:Disadvantages by 1u3hr · · Score: 2
      Uh, no. Artificial diamonds look wrong.

      De Beers is planning to (or may already) etch a tiny hallmark on their diamonds because some artificial ones are now indistinguishable. (Saw this on a documentary a few months ago, so I think trustworthy.) Anyway, to a layman zircon is indistinguishable, so "look wrong" is somewhat an exaggeration, or falling for De Beers' mystique.

    6. Re:Disadvantages by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Dummy, the reason why he is saying that diamonds are expensive is because they are being sold by a price fixing monopoly and they can get away with it. But products, in there native state (unfinished for diamonds, bits on media for windows), are essentially worthless.

      His argument was that the ONLY reason that the price is high is because of the monopoly, and made a comparison to Windows 2000. This would only be a valid analogy if gemstone-quality cut diamonds could be created ex nihilo and replicated at zero cost, which Windows 2000 can be. But gemstone-quality cut diamonds cannot be created ex nihilo, they can only be created by cutting natural diamonds via a laborious process that is different for each natural diamond [i.e., you cannot just run a loop of disk copies to make millions of identical gemstone-quality cut diamonds like you can to create millions of identical desktop-quality {RIGHT ....} Win2K CDs]. And if natural diamonds are so bloody common - why does De Beers have a monopoly on them? If they were so common, they could be dug out of the ground almost anywhere; and yet De Beers doesn't have a monopoly on real estate.

      In other words, the form of monopoly here is hydraulic despotism: De Beers has complete control over a limited resource. The form of monopoly MS has is quite different. Therefore, the poster's argument proceeds via false analogy, and is impeached thereby. Quod erat demonstrandum.

      Dummy my ass.

    7. Re:Disadvantages by gmahan · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Until the late nineteenth century, diamonds were found only in a few riverbeds in India and in the jungles of Brazil, and the entire world production of gem diamonds amounted to a few pounds a year. In 1870, however, huge diamond mines were discovered near the Orange River, in South Africa, where diamonds were soon being scooped out by the ton. Suddenly, the market was deluged with diamonds. The British financiers who had organized the South African mines quickly realized that their investment was endangered; diamonds had little intrinsic value -- and their price depended almost entirely on their scarcity. The financiers feared that when new mines were developed in South Africa, diamonds would become at best only semiprecious gems."

      Full article at The Atlantic

      Diamonds are no longer rare, and are only worth anything for the same reason cabbage patch dolls once were: artificial scarcity.

    8. Re:Disadvantages by MojoRilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Artificial diamonds most certaintly do not "look wrong".

      According to the NOVA program "Diamond Deception" originally broadcast on 2/01/2000, "These synthetic diamonds are such good copies of the real thing that they not only have the identical atomic structure but can even replicate their flaws."

    9. Re:Disadvantages by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Keep in mind that this article was written in 1982. It talks about prices dropping from $60,000 per carat to $30,000 a carat. The colapse it predicts happened in the early '90s, and prices of "perfect" diamonds are now quoted around $5,000 per carat, and can be had for slightly over $1,500 per carat without much trouble. The article also talks about resale values of diamonds being 40% of their retail value. Today, diamonds 1 carat and smaller are essentially worthless. Large retail jewlery chains are still maintaining a significant markup, but that is steadily decreasing now that the public has greater access to wholesale diamonds.

      If she has to have a diamond (even after reading that article), do a little research and buy a loose stone from a wholesale vendor. It's not hard to find one, and you can get a local jewler to make you a very nice setting for $100-300. For two months salary these days, she can have a ring that will give her a workout. When I purchased my fiancee's ring (a 2.72 carat saphire with two .25 carat diamonds in a custom setting she designed. $900) I saw another guy buy a 2.9 carat diamond engagement ring for $3500. It wasn't flawless, but it was an excelent stone, and impractically large.

    10. Re:Disadvantages by ninewands · · Score: 2
      Quoth the poster:
      And if natural diamonds are so bloody common - why does De Beers have a monopoly on them? If they were so common, they could be dug out of the ground almost anywhere; and yet De Beers doesn't have a monopoly on real estate.

      Well, gemstone-quality diamonds ARE quite rare ... but diamonds are not. There are known diamond mines in (non-exhaustive list follows) the Republic of South Africa, Russia, Australia, Canada, Angola, Namibia, Sierra Leone, Syria and even Arkansas (although the mine never produced enough diamonds to be commercially viable, it's quite a popular tourist attraction). Although natural diamonds are not common, they are NOT exceptionally rare. High-quality emeralds are MUCH rarer than D-grade (investment quality (colorless, flawless under 10x magnification)) diamonds and MUCH more expensive.

      The monopoly problem arises when you consider that DeBeers has a monopoly on diamond mining in the RSA, which unquestionably boasts the richest KNOWN Kimberlite pipes on earth. None of the other producers can afford to piss off DeBeers because, just like the Saudis control oil prices, nobody can undercut them for very long if they want to stay in business. DeBeers has the production capacity in place and amortized/depreciated such that they can COLLAPSE world diamond prices and keep them that way long enough to bankrupt all the other producers combined. The smaller producers go along with DeBeers prices because they HAVE to to stay alive.

      In response to this portion of the parent post:
      ... products, in there native state (unfinished for diamonds, ... ), are essentially worthless.

      Nice try, but WELL off the mark. The VAST majority of diamonds mined in the world are sold for industrial use as abrasives. These diamonds are merely crushed and size-graded, and they make up the bulk of the revenue stream from a diamond mine. Gemstone-grade diamonds are such a miniscule fraction of total production that the gem-grade stones could also be crushed and the mines would still be profitable. The extra profit from supplying the jewelry trade is pure gravy.
    11. Re:Disadvantages by 403Forbidden · · Score: 2

      Wrong, wrong, wrong.

      Diamonds have been perfectly maufactured, but Debeers somehow can control the amount that are made per year to create artificial demand. Also Debeers puts IDs on the diamonds to make them "authentic."

      Even if manufacture isn't perfect, this isn't for looks, it's for electrical use.

    12. Re:Disadvantages by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Ninewands - thanks for the correction re: gemstone-quality diamonds, which were the only diamonds I was considering in my postings.
      The rest of your posting is an excellent example of how properly to argue with someone you disagree with, and maintain the respect of your interlocutor.

  10. higher electrical resistance? by w42w42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't that a bad thing? It would increase power requirements, create heat, etc. Even if a diamond chip could stand that, not everything else in the box can - not to mention being a problem for laptop batteries.

    1. Re:higher electrical resistance? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      What's really cool is that diamond is flammable =)

    2. Re:higher electrical resistance? by crgrace · · Score: 2, Informative

      They mean it can withstand higher voltages, not that it has higher electrical resistance. Silicon is an excellent insulator (extremely high electrical resistance) unless impurities (dopants) are added. That is key to the operation of a MOSFET.

    3. Re:higher electrical resistance? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Silicon dioxide is not flammable.

  11. quick thoughts by greechneb · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm glad they waited until after I bought an engagement ring...

    Intel may now become the United States largest diamond importer.

    Just as long as the jewelry store doesn't put up a sign saying "Intel Insides Inside"

  12. Diamond Chips = Thermal death by johngaunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As I recall, one of the ways to utterly destroy a diamond is to run an excess amount of current through it. So, if you try to overclock your diamond chip, could you vaporize it? What about current overloads caused by over heating or bad power supply? Could be interesting.

    --
    In the wild there are no dumb lions tigers or bears. Only humanity subsidizes the continued existence of the stupid.
    1. Re:Diamond Chips = Thermal death by jc42 · · Score: 2

      So, if you try to overclock your diamond chip, could you vaporize it?

      Nah; most of it would just reconfigure as graphite, except at the surface.

      There is a problem with overly-warm diamonds in an oxygen atmosphere: Occasionally, a C atom will join up with a passing O2 molecule and they'll wander off together. This doesn't happen with diamond rings, because the temperature required would be high enough that you'd pull the ring off. But it is a worry in a chip that you want to last for years. But it's easy enough to prevent. You just cover exposed diamond surfaces with a layer of something that blocks the oxygen. Gold will do quite nicely.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  13. damn debeers by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

    this will be a better plan if someone can bust the debeers monopoly, and make diamonds a semi-precious stone.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:damn debeers by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      A quick look at the industry says that manufactured diamonds are within probably a decade or two of being honestly competative, and then another decade or two after that for them to be "accepted", or thought of by the masses as not being 'less than' natural diamonds.

      If this takes off, it will likely help manufactured diamonds' cause, as their demand will be significantly higher (and manufactured diamonds' main problem, color, is irrelevant when being used for industry and not jewlery)

    2. Re:damn debeers by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      I'd like to know when Fabrage will introduce the Egg based server.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:damn debeers by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Yeah. That is correct. But diamonds would be "cheap" tomorrow if DeBeers didn't hold its monopoly.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:damn debeers by ninewands · · Score: 2
      Quoth the poster:
      A quick look at the industry says that manufactured diamonds are within probably a decade or two of being honestly competative, and then another decade or two after that for them to be "accepted"

      Depends on the market you are looking at. Synthetic diamond is the "Gold Standard" for many industrial applications and has been for the last 12-15 years. This is because synthetic diamonds, which are manufactured under highly controlled conditions have much more predictable properties than natural stones and they can be made in forms (e.g. polycrystalline "sheets" for facing cutters on rock bits) that just aren't available in natural diamond.
  14. "up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Diamond chips can work at a temperature of up to 1,000 degrees Celsius, while silicon chips stop working above 150 degrees Celsius"

    Imagine the overclocking!

    1. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by brejc8 · · Score: 2

      What do you case it in?
      What kind of wires do you attach?

    2. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      I already overclocked one. You can see the firewire running through the backplane.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  15. Heat resitstance? by Yokaze · · Score: 2

    Tell me, when we reach temperatures that will make Si melt :)

    I thought the main advantage of diamond over Si is a better heat conductance.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  16. this is fantastic! by TechnoVooDooDaddy · · Score: 2

    Now the diamond conglomerates will face extreme pressure to quit artificially inflating and regulating the cost of diamonds..

  17. Diamond Age by eyeball · · Score: 2

    Another case of life imitating art... or at least catching up with it. To anyone interested in nanotechnology, I suggest reading the Neal Stephenson book "The Diamond Age".

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  18. Ouch! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    I'd hate to pay for a beowulf cluster of those!!!

  19. Did this... Star Wars Research in 80's by snatchitup · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was at Auburn, we had Star Wars funding to look into this. We had created a diode that switched at 2000 celcius.

    The idea was to have IC circuits right inside the rocket engines.

  20. Worst nightmare: by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    Pentiums are forever????

  21. Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by ari_j · · Score: 2

    Wait a minute...

    The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.

    This seems to be going quite in the opposite direction of superconductor research and what most people generally think of as sound design principles - less electrical resistance means a more efficient contraption, right? So what gives? I can't get to the article from here given my Christmas-reduced bandwidth, but is this a Slashdot misprint or is this the truth; and if it's real, then what gives? Why is higher electrical resistance suddenly an advantage?

  22. One thing they didn't mention... by crgrace · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is (at least) one key advantage silicon has over diamond (or any semiconductor except Germanium). It has a self-repairing crystal lattice. When dopant atoms (phosphorous, arsenic, etc.) are injected into the bulk silicon wafer using ion implantation (diffusion not used in practice too much anymore) they cause structural damage to the crystal lattice which would hurt circuit performace. However, Silicon has this magical property that if you heat it up to the right temperature (several hundred degrees Celcius) the lattice begins to reorganize itself to incorporate the dopant atoms without damage. Tis process is called Annealing and it is one of the key reasons Silicon became the dominant semiconductor (the other was the availability of a good thermal oxide, SiO2).

    Diamond does not have this desirable property, so a lot of research will have to go into maintaining the quality of the crystal lattice.

  23. News was thin by mugnyte · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's some background on diamond films:
    In July of this year, scientists in the United States reported that isotopically pure diamond films (containing 99.9% carbon-12 and not the 1% carbon-13 that is present in natural diamonds) had been grown. The pure films not only conducted hear 50% better than the best natural diamonds but also withstood damage by laser radiation ten times more effectively than natural diamond.

    One could have the concept of combining functions: Glass that serves as a semiconductor, etc. Interesting.

    I don't know if manufactured diamonds theaten the jewelry industry, but I doubt it. Although hundreds of almost-slaves labor in mines so deep it's scary, and the industry is full of creepy deals, people buy them, and the industry churns them out just the same.

    mug

  24. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by crgrace · · Score: 2

    I've said this already, but the article was confusing. They meant diamond has a can withstand higher temp. and voltage, not that it was higher resistance in an electrical sense. Their use of resistance had nothing to do with Ohm's Law. I guess the author didn't know about the way the phrase is generally used in electronics.

    Also, they are talking about semiconductors, not superconductors. Very different beasts.

  25. Abundance is driven by cost. by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    The more than something costs, the more practical refining lower quality ore or synthetics becomes. You do it on too large of a scale, however, and you flood the market, and you can't make a profit, so it's a fairly delicate balance.

    There may also be advances in detection technology, collection, or other factors that'll result in more expense, but with it, greater abundance.

    I mean, think about it... scientists and environmentalists keep talking about how we're going to run out of fossil fuels, but they always seem to keep extending out the critical date... It most likely will run out sooner or later, but the oil companies will keep finding a way to prolong it to make a profit as long as they can.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  26. Complete solution? by brejc8 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes Diamonds are better than Silicon but:

    You still cannot get past some limmiting factors like speed of light and the absolute minnimum structure size.

    What the Japanease are looking into will be very large chips. Diamonds are the only good way to get a good yeilds of these. But still when you have a 10x10mm 100 GHz chip it takes several clock cycles to get some information from one side of the chip to the other.

    Normal design methodologies will no longer work in the near future just like they are starting to get difficult now. (Moore's Law slowing down)

  27. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    conduction is the opposite of resistance. Hence a semi-conductor could be called a semi-resistor, so to speak.

    Indeed diamonds are not semi-conductors but complete insulators and they dont pass current. Its rather bizarre but micro-electronics is not of the hardest classes. Its really a physics class to do with electron migration...

  28. Becoming a CPU by thinkliberty · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I die maybe I can become a CPU! Thanks to intel and lifegems http://www.lifegems.com Maybe Intel will want to buy grandpa when he croaks. In the future you'll be able to get a faster processor everytime a loved one dies!

  29. Gratuitous misogynist comments by YellowSnow · · Score: 4, Funny

    I got my girl a diamond earing so she had some processing power above the neck.
    Now SHE wants a beowulf cluster of these.

    1. Re:Gratuitous misogynist comments by Alsee · · Score: 2

      I got my girl a diamond earing so she had some processing power above the neck.

      Oh females have tons of processing power above the neck. It's just that they have different logic gates.

      Men have logic gates like AND, OR, NAND, NOR, and XOR.

      Women have logic gates like SOMETIMES, MAYBE, OCCATIONALLY, THE-OPPOSITE-OF-LAST-TIME, WHAT-DAY-OF-THE-MONTH-IS-IT, READ-MY-MIND-DAMNIT, OOOH!PRETTY-ROCKS!, and many others that no one has been able to figure out yet.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  30. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by crgrace · · Score: 2

    All useful semiconductors are actually semi-insulators: you need doping and bias to promote electrons to the conduction band. In fact, semiconductors are sometimes characterized by their "bandgap voltage" which means how much voltage is required to promote an electron from the valence band, where it is tightly held to the lattice, and the conduction band, where it can move freely as part of an electrical current. The thing that makes diamond withstand high temperatures and voltages, its high bandgap, is also on of the things that makes it hard to work with.

  31. Re:Pilfering by BeeShoo · · Score: 2

    Not all diamonds are gem quality, and therefore, not as valuable (leaving aside for the moment the debate about the "value" of objects purely because they're shiny). In another life, or at least it seems that way, I was a machinist. Diamond cutting bits are quite common and desirable (for some jobs) because of their hardness. While these tools are more expensive, because they don't use gem quality diamonds, they aren't near as expensive as you would think.

    It's doubtful that any gem quality diamonds would ever be used for chips.

  32. In Robert Leach voice: by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.

    And a certain BLING, BABY!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  33. Re:Resistance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    heat tolerance is important as the power dissipated is impressive with today's chips. Due to diamond's rather large bandgap, heat tolerance is a better than Si. Resistance is also useful. I'd imagine creating a MOSFET with a leaky gate is problematic. Part of the reason that BJTs dominated in the early days of the semiconductor industry is the lack of a suitable substance as an insulator between the gate and the channel. I'm thinking the researchers are referring to diamond's natural ability in undoped form to resist current flow, so that's one less obstacle to overcome.

  34. Diamond Data by notestein · · Score: 4, Informative

    The idea of using diamond as a semiconductor has been kicking around for years with quite a bit of research being done world wide.

    Technology Research News has an article published in September that discusses this.

    Among other things they mention that diamond's charge carrier mobility is three times better.

    Diamond transistors could in theory deliver one watt of power at 100 gigahertz, or billion cycles per second, said Isberg. This is five times faster has been achieved using the semiconductor Gallium Arsenide.

    Diamond-based electronics would also be better than existing semiconductor materials for high-temperature applications, said Isberg. Diamond conducts heat 15 times more efficiently than silicon, and therefore cools faster.

    etc. etc.

  35. And now of course.... by b96miata · · Score: 2, Funny

    We cue the pseudo-gangsta asian kid saying "Even mah pc is iced out FOOOL!"

  36. Uh oh... by c_monster · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will we tell the people from the machines if we can't refer to them as carbon-based and silicon-based life anymore?

    --
    Read the full text my book Perl for the Web
  37. Some diamond facts. by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Informative

    - Diamonds, as used in jewelry, are artificially rare. That's right.. the rock on your engagement ring is only rare because DeBeers & friends keep millions and millions of diamonds locked up in vaults. This is not conspiracy theory... it's a verifiable fact.

    - The average cost of diamond, if all diamonds available were in circulation, instead of in vaults, would be about $1.50 per ct.

    - Small diamonds, the kind used in diamond saws, industry, etcetera, are NOT expensive, like your engagement ring. Small diamonds are common and cheap, because they have no real jewelry market. Diamond impregnated stones and blades cost more because it costs more to manufacture them.. not because of the diamond.

    - Good luck convincing your girl of ANY of this. You still have to buy that rock. Get over it..

  38. Looking forward to my first diamond-based PC by pogen · · Score: 2

    How else can two months' salary last forever?

  39. Pfft! by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

    And you guys thought they couldn't find a way to make computers really expensive again!

  40. The main advantages of diamond by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...include... higher electrical resistance.

    Is that all it takes? I have lots of stuff here that might be groundbreaking...

    World awed by carpet-based semiconductor

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  41. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    very high resistance is good for the substrate, upon which you place your doped (conductive) materials for active components, and metals for "wires"....this keeps current leakage down.

  42. SiO2 vs. CO2 by jmv · · Score: 2

    I wonder how they're going to replace SiO2 as an insulator. With silicon, if you want an insulator, you just add oxygen and heat a bit and you get an SiO2 (glass) layer, which is a good insulator. With Carbon (diamond), all you'd get is CO2, which is pretty useless (not to mention anti-Kyoto). They'll need a good (and cheap) insulator for carbon, don't remember what they did for GaAs, though...

    1. Re:SiO2 vs. CO2 by jmv · · Score: 2

      Diamond IS an insulator

      Pure Si is an insulator too, but not good enough for the ultra-thin gates of MOS transistors in current designs. Gate (leak) currents are already getting too large for SiO2 and I doubt that diamond is better than SiO2... Also, if you're doping, it's likely that you can't get pure-C (diamond) insulators.

      For doping, I guess there isn't much choice other than to use nitrogen and Boron with ion implant...

  43. Will this replace their love of the ruby? by egg+troll · · Score: 2

    I thought everyone knew that the favorite gem of the Japanese was the Ruby!

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  44. Diamonds can spontaneously combust. by digital+photo · · Score: 2, Funny

    True quartz has piezoelectric factors... but Diamonds can burn! Just like coal... except they explode due to the pressures inherit in their creation...

    Overclocker1: Shit, wonder how many more degrees I can clock this baby...

    Overclocker2: Did you remove the oxygen?

    Overclocker1: What? Why?

    *BOOM*

    Okay, maybe not that drastic... but it's pretty nasty.

  45. AMD... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    "This property means that diamond chips can work at a much higher frequency or faster speed and be placed in a high-temperature environment, such as a vehicle's engine..." ... or an Athlon machine.

  46. Re:Wasn't there a specific reason why Si was used? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Funny

    They used to used vaccum tubes to build computers before. Some properties of vaccum tubes were inherently more valuable than heaps of sand.

    How is it that they aren't using vaccum tubes any more?

  47. Re:Only a couple thousand degrees more.... by DuBois · · Score: 2
    I already have a Sun server...

    Oh wait... You didn't mean that kind of Sun.

    --
    The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  48. Neglected to mention... by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 2

    Scuffing feet new trend in tablet-pc users

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  49. Talk about a hot computer by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2
    Diamond chips can work at a temperature of up to 1,000 degrees Celsius, while silicon chips stop working above 150 degrees Celsius,

    Yep. I can just see it now. Camouflaging my 4 processer server as a hot-plate. Problem is, when I set my computer to 'simmer' quake goes down to 158 frames/second.

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  50. Re:Other Advantages by Squarewav · · Score: 2

    actualy diamonds are abundant, its just that the ones good enough to make a ring out of are very rare , the majority of diamonds they pull out of the ground are ether too yellow or are not shaped properly making them useless for anything other then sand paper

  51. Boys best friend? by chris_sawtell · · Score: 2

    I think so.

  52. Re:I can see it now.... by lvdrproject · · Score: 2
    fiancé
    n.

    A man to whom a woman is engaged to be married.


    Think you meant "fiancée", there, ace.