Windows Security Holes Go Mostly Unexploited
murky.waters writes "Wired News has an article with a decidedly different take on security holes in Microsoft Windows: Despite the thousands of known exploits and virii, most MS users aren't target of much harm, and the big guns such as Klez have had almost no effect on home users. An interesting read that, if true, challenges some common arguments."
Can someone explain to me how defacing this website makes piracy less wrong? Does this mean that if I find an overlooked cgi on fsf.org that I can consequently justify violating the GPL?
Hey, this worm can't exist. I just searched MicroSoft.
Search Results
for "Opaserv" using All words
Sorry, no results were found for this search.
That sure is a bad one, thanks for pointing it out I will add it to my list of "why we don't use M$ products".
---
-Saying Windows has security problems is like running into a burning theater and yelling fire.
No. I'm holding Microsoft responsible for shitty code written by people who thought they'd get big bucks after going to a three-month course at a local community college. That same code that's either unaudited or audited by somebody no more technically advanced.
There's something called "criminal negligence". Look it up. Criminal negligence is all about how, if you can't do a job right, you aren't allowed to do it at all. If you go ahead and do it anyways, and that causes some harm to some person, you're criminally negligent.
Barclay family motto:
Aut agere aut mori.
(Either action or death.)
Give us some real proof to this fantastic stat dick wad. "Did you know 38% of all statistics are made up". Where did you read this? Who did the research? and how vulnerable does the flaw make the system.