Slashdot Mirror


How to Use Your iPod Under Linux

Jon writes "For those lucky readers who received an iPod for Christmas I've put up an article on LinuxLookup.com on how I got my iPod working under Linux. I've given a little overview on the different options available, and which one worked best for my needs. All in all, I'm extremely happy with the outcome. I can transfer my music, create playlists, and add all of my contacts. The only thing missing is a nice GUI."

7 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. iPod is great but.... by My_nickname_is_taken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just can't justify the price. Sure it's sleek and sexy, sounds great, has multiple interfaces for data transfer, but it's priced at least a couple hundred $$ above the competition.

    For $229 (BestBuy $279 + $50 mail in rebate) I'm very satisfied with my Archos Jukebox Recorder 20.

    It has 20GB HD, USB 1.1,2.0, and comes bundled with Music match Jukebox.

    My wife uses it mostly, so it's only seen Windoze, but I'm sure it wouldn't take long for me to get it working with Linux. If someone hasn't done it already.

    --
    "No Matter Where You Go.. There You Are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Re:Goodbye "Not Invented Here" days by bogie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    " There was a time, not long ago, where Apple made interesting, even innovative technology--but designed it so it worked only with its Macintosh hardware."

    I guess if Apple was actually in the habit of coming up with cool gadgets year after year you might have a point. But the only possibly crossplatform gadgets I can think of that Apple has even innovated in the past 15 years are the newton and the ipod. So while it may be all well and good that the Ipod hasn't specifically been designed so it won't work in Windows or Linux, Apple mostly continues to be a computer maker not a inventor of new technology for all platforms. So again I'm just not sure what your point was since Apple really only makes computers, not hardware for every platform that we can all benefit from.

    "It's great for the industry and many others that Apple is slowly crawling out of the mindset that all of their products must work strictly with a Mac."

    One product (the ipod) doesn't mean much. Especially when you consider its not Apple themselves making it work with other platforms.

    Sorry if I seem negative about this, but your whole post seems to try to give Apple credit for something they haven't earned. What you said is akin to sending congrats to MS because their mice are cross platform. Now you may be able to do so, but A) this wasn't intended and B) it represents a minority of MS's product line.

    Just something to think about.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  4. Re: Learn to be a Luddite by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 3, Interesting
    To use your own example, CNN doesn't scale at all. Whenever a major news even happens, CNN goes offline, along with MSNBC, et. al. CNN actually has a "breaking news" mode that eliminates all the database-driven crap from their front page. Yahoo scales well because they make extensive use of pre-generated files. Imagine that! For example, the charts on finance.yahoo.com are generated periodically, not custom generated on every request.

    Thanks for sharing your expert knowledge of httpd.cond.dist.

  5. Re:Goodbye "Not Invented Here" days by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No it isn't. Otherwise why are Apple buying up app vendors (I don't recall the name of the product i'm thinking of, some graphics/music program), and scaring all the customers silly because they think Apple will make them Mac only?

    You may be thinking of Shake.

    Except OS X isn't tinkerable at all. Practically all the code Apple has written is closed source, and the Mac parts of MacOS are generally only capable of doing things one way.

    Hogwash. Just because it's closed-source doen't mean it's not tinkerable. Perhaps not to the extent you'd like, but really, how many end users hack the source code of their GUI? OSX has a ways to go, but it's quickly becoming more hackable than OS9 ever was, and if you don't think OS9 was hackable, well, you haven't known many Mac users.

    Unlike every Linux and Windows, MacOS is still not capable of being themed by 3rd parties (unless you consider a grey version of the default a "theme").

    Hogwash. I'm using a third-party theme right now. It happens to be an imitation of the Platinum theme from Mac OS 9, because that's what I happen to like, but there are others. Not a huge number of themes available, but it's a relatively new OS. They'll come.

    And yes, this Platinum theme is a little quirky - it's got a funny little piece of something at the top of the scrollbar, no window borders, and a few other details aren't quite right. And, I've combined it with the Mozilla Classic theme from Mac OS 9, which is even quirkier with the OSX version of Mozilla. I'll probably go back to Modern. Anyway, like I said, give it time.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  6. Re:Goodbye "Not Invented Here" days by geek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Umm, they pushed USB and they made Firewire to name just two. Think a little harder on that and then post again.

    To compliment their achievments in hardware they open or offer freely a lot of software now as well, Darwin and Rendevouz not to mention the quicktime streaming server.

  7. Re:Been over this... USB 2.0 has a Purpose by puto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have 5 USB 2.0 80 gig drives in the field. I get them for 140 bucks a piece.

    1. They offer another back up option. My networks have tapes but they also have this extra redundancy. Connect it to a plane jane windows box running 2000(any old box). And you can have it back up your entire network quickly and easily in the wee small hours. 80 gigs is a lot space and you can restore from it rather quickly, much quicker than a tape. Still keep the tapes but for an 80 gig back up that will run for about 3 years constantlym you can beat the price.

    2. I have one that does in my tech back with 4 20 gig partitions, one is mp3's for me to listen to. One is just about every software tool imaginable. The third is ISOs of all the redhats, windows, solaris,office, you name it i got it. And the fourth I use to grab files with that need fixing.

    I also carry an interface card with me. Because now I dont carry around all those cds. If I have to dump a lotta data, i just pop in the 2.0 card(if the machine doesnt have it) and I boogie.

    USB 2.0 is fast enough for me, will be more widepread than firewire. And I have never had a problem with it.

    Now my 'doctor' bad is just a Leatherman, this drive, and the adaptor card, and one cd with the drivers.

    Firewire is great technology but Apple forced intels hand when the wanted to charge per installation per motherboad. They reneged but way after the fact. That is why it didnt take off so quick.

    I have an ipod, and an ibook. And firewire is fast. But I gotta say when I can dump 10 gigs in hardly anytime. No messing with tapes(I still use em but this is quicker) if it fails I always have the tape.

    My other USB 2.0 personal drive gets the same treatment as my clients. I leave the house for the night, it goes with me.

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised