Slashdot Mirror


E ~ mc^2

DrBlake writes "New York Times has an article about a study of Einsteins theory of relativity that I found very interesting. Not only might the speed of light be relative under certain circumstances, the famous equation E=mc2 might not be entirely correct."

11 of 429 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no.... by t3kad0n · · Score: 3, Funny

    My world is falling apart.

  2. Light Speed limits... by Red+Warrior · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just A good idea. Not the law. ?

    --
    "If, therefore, any be unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone."
    ~Epictetus
  3. Coincidence...? by CyberDong · · Score: 5, Funny
    This story's at the top of the page, and look what's at the bottom:

    186,000 Miles per Second. It's not just a good idea. IT'S THE LAW.

    1. Re:Coincidence...? by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny
      186,000 Miles per Second. It's not just a good idea. IT'S THE LAW.
      Actual mileage may vary.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  4. I just thought of the funniest joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Hope you like it:


    IN SOVIET RUSSIA,


    mc**2 = e


    Heheee. +5 FUnny,.

  5. Re: Re:Of course not.... by starsong · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... If you do i will have to shoot some sense into you all.

    Will your bullets have momentum or should I quiver in fear at their rest energy? :)

  6. I hate to say this... by dasunt · · Score: 4, Funny

    But why do you think that your brain is capable of understanding the basic forces of the universe?

    Your brain evolved to keep you away from things that want to eat you, find things you want to eat, and basically preserve you until you could insure that you have spread your genes. Last time I checked, understanding the basic rules of reality wasn't needed to ensure that you live long enough to breed.

    Hell, we'er just lucky that the same math that works on our scale also seems to work when we look at how the universe works.

    Even now, logic has begun to fail us when we ask the deep questions. Consider this: What made this reality? Oh sure, I know the theories that suggest that this universe might have been created by another universe, and at this level, cause and effect goes out the window, leading to the possibility that this universe can create the ancestor of the universe that created it, but what allowed this gestalt to exist?

    There's an Heinleinian phrase that occasionally gets said on slashdot: There ain't no such thing as a free lunch (TANSTAAFL). Too bad that its wrong, since the universe is the biggest example of a free lunch in action.

    [ Don't feel so bad - my brain also seems hellbent to make me survive long enough to ensure my genes are passed on. Damn thing is that my body agrees with it and is planning to expire in half a century in order to free up resources for my future offspring. Its a comspiracy, I tell you... ]

    Just my $.02

  7. What is C relative to? by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude......C is relative to B. It's C++ and Java that's relative to C. Cobol is a different species altogether.....

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  8. Bummer by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    But

    E=mc^1.99999923850927642081748272

    is just not quite as catchy. Harder to fit on T-shirts also.

  9. Re:You misunderstand completely by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 5, Funny
    The job of the scientist is thus to question *everything.*
    Why?
    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  10. Re:so if two objects are traveling toward the same by Alsee · · Score: 3, Funny

    The maths of karma are simply too complex for most geeks to understand

    No, I doubt the geeks had any trouble with it. It was a perfectly logical system. It was the non-geeks who didn't get it.

    2+2=0 (mod 4 arithmetic)
    2+2=1 (mod 3 arithmetic)
    2+2=1.9999999 (relativity)
    2+2=2 (bitwise OR)
    2+2=3 (karma cap at 3).
    2+2=5 (2 is really 2.4 rounded down and 5 is really 4.8 rounded up)
    2+2=10 (base 3 arithmetic)
    2+2=22 (string concatenation)
    2+2=44 (sum of ascii characters, hexidecimal)
    2+2=100 (sum of ascii characters, decimal)

    Geeks "get it". Non-geeks don't understand anything other than 2+2=4.

    Cross refference this post.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.