Review of Mozilla's 2002
An anonymous reader writes "MozillaZine is currently featuring an article looking back at the last 12 months of the Mozilla project. It's amazing to see how far things have come in 2002. A year ago, there was no Mozilla 1.0, no Netscape 7, no Phoenix, no Chimera and no shipping AOL clients using Gecko (Mozilla's rendering engine). An interesting read."
I gotta wear shades.
Long live the bayesian spam filtering!
Check out the zeppelin logo on Mozillazine www-pages!
A red star is painted on that zeppelin! RED STAR - why the hell? Communists in China and Russia are using red star -logos even today. So does this mean that Mozilla is the communist choice?
No, the problem is really one of adaptation: Once it's build, once it's available, how do you make people come and use it?
http://www.jwz.org/doc/lemacs.html
See users switch. Switch, users, switch! See RMS fume. Fume, RMS, fume.
If you have to brainstorm ways of getting users to switch to your very-slightly-different application, the game is already over and you lost.
No popups, no Javascript, no 0wN0RZing. When Mozilla gets better than IE 3.0, call me. And please shut up about the tabs. Hide task bar much?
Mozillazine had a blurb about it. Here's the full text:
This _has_ to be good for mainstream acceptance when such non-tech-oriented magazines like Playboy laud Mozilla so greatly. Maybe if other general living and style magazines adopt such a positive attitude, we'll see a surge in Mozilla adoption. Hey, maybe its wishful thinking but if nothing else, it's increasing awareness.
P.S. -- Consider this proof that I *DO* read the articles. :-P