Slashdot Mirror


Science Fact From Fiction

Embedded Geek writes "The European Space Agency maintains an ongoing project called Innovative Technologies from Science Fiction for Space Applications (ITSF) (Cliquetez ici pour la version française). Its goal is "to review past and present SF literature, artwork and films in order to identify and assess innovative technologies and concepts described which could be possibly developed further for space applications." While I had known about Clarke first envisioning the geostationary satellite, the site also lists some other interesting ideas first pitched in SF: planetary landers, rocket fins, and space stations assembled in orbit. Visitors to the site are encouraged to submit technologies from SF works, although they should look at the master keyword list to avoid duplication first. Also of interest is a spiffy little brochure and a writing contest. Even if it never results in any new technology actually being developed, the site is a nice resource for science educators and science fiction fans."

4 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Death Star by rde · · Score: 5, Funny

    Under normal circumstances, I'd suggest a Death Star. In these heady days when we're considering technologies that might, in our lifetimes, get us to other star systems, it's important to have something that'll enable us to blow the shit out of anything that looks at us funny.

    Of course, there would be problems. Remember the arguments about the status of Pluto? That'd be nothing compared to something like the death star.

    "That's no moon."
    "Yes it bloody is"
    etc

  2. Re:Bluetooth? by Longjmp · · Score: 5, Funny

    You don't need UFOs. This is even more scary.

    Translation of screen display:

    New hardware detected.
    (spoiler omitted)
    Start auto-configuration now?
    [Start] [Cancel]

    --
    There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
  3. Re:Arthur C. Clarkes Geostationary satellites by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 5, Informative

    I read his original report, he was showing how a minimum system could be built for full earth coverage. He wrote this at a time when space flight was still very much fiction (about ten years before Sputnik) and there were vacuum tubes rather than semiconductors. Tubes need regular replacement, hence the need for a manned presence.

  4. Re:Arthur C. Clarkes Geostationary satellites by alistair · · Score: 5, Informative
    For people who wish to read the report itself, the London Science Museum has images of the entire Wireless World article available here.

    Personally, I think he got the most important points correct in anticipating the advantages of a Geostationary orbit. I suspect he suggested only three of them due to the huge cost of building them and he does show (correctly) that these three satellites would cover the major regions of "Africa and Europe", "China and Oceana" and "The Americas" (page three) while allowing point to point communication between the three satellites.

    True, he did predict huge manned stations powered by valves with people to replace the valves but it seems harsh to critisise him for not inventing Moores Law 20 years early. Much of the rest of the text is both valid and visionary. For some other examples of his work the site has a short information page here.


    While browsing the site you may also want to look at the Quicktime VR movie of the inside of Apollo 10. The Science Museums Space Gallery has always been one of my favourites and this is a nice attept to put some of it online (plus I helped in the making of this a few years back :-) ).