Slashdot Mirror


Apple To Charge for Some iApps

randomErr writes "News.com has this story that according to sources familiar with the plans, Apple is expected to announce at the Macworld Expo in San Francisco Tuesday that consumers will have to pay for new versions of iDVD, iPhoto and iMovie. Previously, Apple had offered upgrades to its digital media, or 'i' applications, for free."

5 of 493 comments (clear)

  1. $50 for all three by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative

    The prevailing rumor is that the asking price will be around $50 for iDVD, iMovie, and iPhoto together.

    In other news, Apple is rumored to make an announcement about 802.11g.

    --

    I write in my journal
  2. Re:Well, duh. by damiam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quicktime is still free. If you want to use it to develop content and convert media, you pay for Quicktime Pro. It's a fairly good deal for what you get.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  3. Re:Well, duh. by Bobartig · · Score: 5, Informative

    It would be like MS making you buy Media Player

    You seam to be forgetting that Quicktime Pro has hundreds of features that Media Player doesn't. QTPro isn't just a player. It arranges/edits/layers various forms of time-based media, and allows encoding and preparing of media clips in about 20-30 different audio and video formats for a variety of applications, such as streaming applications or DVD authoring. It has support for sprites, links, vector based animation for building interactive multimedia projects. Can your Media Player do this?

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  4. History of the iApps by thefinite · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is great to see people reacting reasonably to this.

    The charging for iApps is not a new thing:
    iMovie 2 cost $30.
    iDVD 2 was $20 (s&h)

    When OS X came out, you got iMovie 2 free with it as a reason to upgrade. iPhoto, when it came out, was also free, IF you had OS X. Then, somehow, it entered the general Mac consciousness that the iApps were always meant to be free. The truth was, they cost you whatever you paid to run OS X.

    iTunes, iSync, & iCal will probably always be free. The others offer a lot more value. Now that so many people have upgraded to OS X, there is no reason for Apple to give it to them free again. I don't mind paying if that means quality upgrades. However, the whole point is that the iApps were always meant to make money, just in different ways. They will continue to serve that pupose and in different ways as time goes on.

    --
    Boom Shanka
  5. Re:Rip-off by kitzilla · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you tried this?

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=1 20 084

    Lemme know!

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.