Linux Is Cheaper
An anonymous reader writes "ZDNet is running a story on what a lot of us already know: Linux IS cheaper than Windows. This not because it is free. It is because Linux admins, although slightly more expensive, can handle a significantly larger number of systems than their Windows counterparts."
When will you post "Brazilian Cable Company Accused of Capping Modems at Lower Speeds"?
I thought this site was about "stuff that matters".
People could pay me money to install Linux, I still still can't use Lightwave on it today.
I mean seriously, the OS isn't the biggest issue when using computers at a business. There's apps and there's the people using it. One could make the argument that Macs are more expensive than Windows based machines, but some places still choose to use them.
I guess what I'm really saying is "Yah, whatever, it's still not a decisive argument."
No shit? {Sorry for this kind of response, but heck, you asked for it}
Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
sound like: My dad can beat up your dad.
Me like Lunix because it learn me good grammar.
"Well first of all you are assuming you'd know if someone else 0wned your machines."
;)
Well, if you're going to assume that, then how do you know Linux is secure? Derr.
"Secondly, if you've been screwed by a worm, that just shows how vulnerable you are to a person with even limited abilities."
Yep, I sure had limited abilities when I first started doing that type of work a couple of years ago. I heard you weren't terribly good at walking when you were young.