Slashdot Mirror


TurboPower's Delphi Components Going Open

Luiz Bucci writes "According to the company web site, TurboPower Software announces their immediate withdrawal from the retail component and developer tools market. As part of the move, TurboPower announces its intention to release their award winning component libraries as open source to the maximum extent possible. The resulting open source projects will be hosted on SourceForge." (SourceForge and Slashdot are both part of VA Software). TurboPower's libraries cover "compression, serial communication, faxing, Internet communication, scheduling, data entry, encryption, and XML manipulation."

14 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. WOOHOO! by sstamps · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a Turbo Pascal and now Delphi developer, I have used TurboPower components off and on for many moons.

    I hate it that they are leaving the retail scene, but I am glad that they are leaving behind one of the best libraries Turbo Pascal/Delphi ever had.

    My hat's off to them for this bold move. Now if we could just get an open-source Delphi-compliant compiler on Linux, I'd be happy. Yeah Free Pascal is pretty good; I use it, but it is not yet up to the level of Delphi under Windows in terms of features and libraries.

    --
    -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
    1. Re:WOOHOO! by Radical+Rad · · Score: 5, Informative
      Now if we could just get an open-source Delphi-compliant compiler on Linux, I'd be happy.

      Have you not heard of Kylix Open Edition? You can't be refusing to use it just because the compiler itself is not open source since you just said you use Delphi. Download it and give it a whirl. The new version lets you program in Object Pascal or C++.
      Kylix 3 Open Edition free download

  2. The Cult of Delphi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still use delphi after initially working on a large project with it about 6 years ago.

    I still find it to be an exellent tool for whipping up small windowed apps for my own personal use. I find it to be fast and stable, and object pascal is a very nice language. As well, there is a large community of developers and open source code out there.

    Delphi does have a bit of a 'cult' following. The largest user base, as far as I am aware, is in Russia.

    All of the Russian developers at work love it, and they can't understand why we don't use Delphi (instead of the company mandated J2EE web-app architechture) to write small apps that only have a handful of users.

  3. good VB alternative by exhilaration · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think this would provide the open source community with a good alternative to VB.

    I don't use Delphi, never have, nor do I plan to, but I'll welcome any product that gives further credibility to open source and free software. And I'll applaud any company that takes a product open source - it takes a lot of guts to release the code to a product that might be supporting your company.

  4. Re:delphi by BagOBones · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well you can download a demo at Borlands website.
    I learned MS C++, MFC programing before finding Delphi. Borlands IDE makes development quick an painless.
    Delphi is most often used as a RAD tool for building frontends to databases, so you see it used A LOT in large companies for inhouse tools, but it is able to build any type of app or dll that you would want.
    Many popular apps are also writen in Delphi but sometimes it takes a keen eye to pick them out.
    HomeSite formerly by Alaire http://www.macromedia.com/software/homesite/
    Motherboard Monitor http://mbm.livewiredev.com/
    Inno Setup Installer http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php
    To name a few that you may have heard of

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
  5. Re:this is wonderful news, but.... by Cef · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Given the way TurboPower ships most of it's components, I'd actually think this will not be much of a problem.

    Pretty much when you bought a license of one of their components (such as AsyncPro), you got the source. One of my friends found a few bugs in AsyncPro, worked out how to fix them, and then alerted TurboPower about the bug and the fix. So the source has previously had a number of eyes outside of TurboPower actually reviewing it.

    Plus (as I mention elsewhere) TurboPower have already got quite a number of their components working under Kylix, and seem pretty clueful on the whole. They seemed to have an attitude of "well, we need this, so lets write it ourselves!" rather than always resorting to high level API's or 3rd party modules.

  6. Not such great news by uradu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Delphi were the 800 pound gorilla of development tools, fine, the more companies open their products, the better. But as things are, the last thing Delphi needs is major component vendors throwing in the towel. It's sad because Delphi offers one of the few sane and productive alternatives to Microsoft's painful tools and frameworks (.NET shows promise but isn't there yet in terms of maturity and widespread use).

  7. Sad to see them go, glad to see them stay by toolz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Turbopower has always been uncoventional in its approach, and opensourcing their stuff, rather than taking it down with them, is a clear example of this. Their libraries are extremely useful, very professionally done, well documented and very stable.

    If they work well under Kylix, then this is an unbelievable bonanza for many Delphi/Kylix developers. If opensourcing them makes it easier to port them to be usable under FreePascal, then hallelujah!

    I have been a Turbopower customer since the days of Kim Kokonnen's DOS TSR libs back in the 80s.

    These guys really redefined the concept of customer service then - supporting a newbie programmer like me in Bangalore, India via Compuserve and mail was no joke, but they did it, and they did it well. Would you believe a small company today mailing huge amount of support material to a one-off customer on the other side of the world, at their own cost?

    I was able to build products that earned me a tremendous amount of money in those days, and wouldn't have been able to do so had they not supported me the way they did.

    I moved away from the DOS/Windows platform in the 90s after Linux came onto the scene, and ceased being a developer by the mid-90s (I am "just" a user now ;).

    But I do know whom to thank for my start - that would be Kim, Terry, Julian and the entire bunch of folks at Turbopower.

    I am sad to see Turbopower "go away", but at the same time, I am glad to see that they are at least taking a stab at "immortality" by opensourcing their work.

    --
    You aren't remembered for doing what is expected of you
  8. Random thoughts (off-topic) by stikves · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I know this is offtopic, but I have somethings to say as a (former) Pascal user.



    Pascal is good in some areas:

    • Pascal is very "neat" (except for pointer syntax, which has been fixed in ObjectPascal/Delphi).
    • It's fast, especially in development time.
    • It's well known and it had been used widely.
    • thus, there is alreasy too much source code and binary components readily available (anybody remembers SWAG?).
    • It's strongly typed (not an advantage for evertone, though).
    • It's object oriented and has a very nice syntax (compare and avarage MFC code with a Delphi one and see).
    • It's portable (thanks to GNU Pascal and FreePascal, the latter is much better).
    • There are already a very sufficient library support for FreePascal (if anything is missing, you can import C libraries easily).
    • It's good for database programming (i do not know why, but some vendors used to mix SQL in Pascal or vice versa).

      However something is missing (except for A^[13] syntax): the applications. There are too many tools (IDEs, RAD tools, libraries). There are many DOS and Windows apps, but it's not used in Linux, yet.

      And here some ideas for using pascal...

      • mod_pascal: OO programming for Apache, with use of existing data access and XML objects.
      • server console: anybody remembers Netware console? Instead of the regular shell, we can start the servers in a special console application, probably using TurboVision or similar.
      • gui applications: Delphi is a very nice and rapid way to deploy GUIs, with Kylix and lazarus, we can start a gui movement (especailly frontends to various Linux software), until mono is ready.
      • marketing: Kylix is there, but not much used. Why not advertise it as a movement path for developers (MFC -> VCL -> CLX -> Linux).


      But I guess we need to finish lazarus first :)
  9. I've Used Several of These by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They were among the best a decade ago. They put numerous competitors out of business with their high quality, good support, good performance, and fairly decent design. Last I fought with them, not quite so good. They had evidently turned over staff, had expanded product line, and had been somewhat outdone by some competitors. When I called them with a bug report that one of their components was just about worthless, they no longer said that they would fix things ASAP and that a fixed download would be out soon; they said that it's a bug and that I should try one of their other components that provided something similar. So, I'm not surprised that they are giving it up. There is a steady stream of Delphi products coming out of Russia that must make life miserable for anyone in this market in the US. But with Turbo Power's components as a starter and more eyes looking at the code, the Russians might now have serious competition again.

  10. Don't Forget by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Up until at least version 4, Microsoft's Visual Basic was distributed with some code that was written in Delphi.

    I've seen two web services demos. One by a Borland guy using Delphi 6 when that was new (a little over a year ago IIRC) and the other by an MS guy using C# about 2 months ago. The Borland guy put together things that worked and did it quickly and impressively. The MS master kept fooling with his own equipment, groping to figure out how to change the font so the audience could see the demo. He couldn't. The demos went downhill from there. He couldn't accomplish more than a third of diddly compared to the Borland guy.

  11. Switching to slot machines? by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    TurboPower is owned, the Turbo Power site says, by Aristocrat Technologies, an Australian maker of slot machines. Aristocrat has a whole line of networked products for casino operation, customer tracking, security, and related functions.

    There's historical precedent for gambling companies pushing the state of the art in computing. Some of the earliest work in commercial computers was funded by American Totalizator, the company that built racetrack betting systems.

  12. The wages of freedom by willw · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems that - notwithstanding the release of Kylix - not so many people around here are familiar with the Delphi scene. A feature that has distinguished it from its Microsoft competitors is that it is very easy to write good object-oriented components for it. Partly because of this and partly because there is a good 'Delphi scene', for many years there have been large numbers of free Pascal libraries and componenets on the Web. You'll find many of them catalogued on sites like the Polish Delphi Super Page and the Russian Torry's Delphi Pages, as well as the inevitable SourceForge.

    In this environment, all software houses that make Delphi components have struggled to make money. Only the very best have survived - who is going to pay money for a slightly dodgy replacement tree control when the slickest, fastest one available is an Open Source freebie?

    TurboPower was originally the most innovative of companies, and even if it had lost its way a bit in recent times its passing as a Delphi component vendor is an occasion for regret. You'll find any number of free Delphi libraries for doing serial comms; I suspect that only TurboPower's includes a complete terminal emulator with its own scripting language, and only TurboPower's that includes a fully-fledged fax modem driver complete with all the very tedious stuff to encode and decode Fax TIFF files. All this conscientiously and beautifully documented. There are many other examples of excellence in TurboPower's large range.

    I don't claim there is any reason why all this shouldn't have evolved in an Open Source environment. But AFAIK it hasn't. If the success of Delphi as a tool for Open Source development means that companies such as TurboPower can no longer survive, then I think long term all Delphi (and Kylix) programmers will be much the poorer for it.

  13. Great, but.... by Tall+Rob+Mc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course, we'll all take any announcement of the open-sourcing of useful software as good news. However, I hope a trend doesn't develop where OSS becomes known as "what happens to software when companies die." I'd rather see software open-sourced in a profitable way as opposed to the "we're pulling out of the market so why the hell not" way that is becoming more and more common.