Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake Releases 9.1b1, New Packaging Model

DCowern writes "Mandrake today announced version 9.1 of their distribution. While there are some interesting choices for new packages (like kernel 2.4.21pre2 and XFree86 4.3 beta) the most groundbreaking thing about this release is the way in which they decide which packages are "high priority" for development and inclusion in the standard install. Any registered user at MandrakeClub can vote. Their opinion is that no one knows where development effort needs to be spent better than the end-user." Update: 01/10 19:38 GMT by T : That's "distribution."

16 of 334 comments (clear)

  1. I love the naming techniques by Lt+Razak · · Score: 5, Funny
    Mandrake 9.1b1, kernel 2.4.21pre2 and XFree86 4.3 beta.

    You just gotta love these release numbers2.1a

  2. nice timing by muyuubyou · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just the day after I downloaded 3 SUSE CD's from a 56K....

    1. Re:nice timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      read it like you would "the day after i completed my 15-day experiment"

  3. Re:Money woes? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny
    Yes. They're finally making a profile, after a persuing a strategy that apparently started off which collecting a whole bunch of underpants.

    Nobody knows what they did after that, but now they're making a profit.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  4. Re:run mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You have friends???

  5. Re:Oh thank you God by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

    >> It caused crashes (Grip for whatever reason seamed to lock up the desktop), problems (not working on reiserFS), more crashes (NVidia drivers crash when rendering 3D continuiously)

    Warning.

    You have violated the Slashdot Linux Zealot Act of 2003 by stating that Mandrake linux crashed.

    Please repost your comment, replacing Mandrake with Microsoft and Grip with Outlook, or we will be forced to notify the authorities.

    Objectivity regarding Open Source software will not be tolerated.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  6. Re:Democratic source? by jpa5n · · Score: 2, Funny

    Designing by vote isn't a bad idea at all. A number of comments I see on /. are to the tune of "If only (project X) had (feature y) it would be perfect". Or with M$-related postings, "If only (application X) didn't have (feature y) it would be better". Let's say the Mandrake folks love Python and want it to install *instead* of Perl by default in their distro. That's fine -- it's there distro. But potentially if you ask the users you might find it's a different story about what they want. Simple equation: Many users = popular Few users = unpopular Note this doesn't mean good or bad, just popular. If the goal is more Linux and less Windows, popular is just as (if not more) important than technical merit.

  7. MandrakeClub? by grub · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shades of Mickey..

    All together now!

    M.. A.. N..
    D.. R.. A..
    K.. E.. C.. L.. U.. B..

    MandrakeClub!
    MandrakeClub!
    The Linux group you're sure to lub!

    Who's the leetest of the groups that's made for you and me?
    M.. A.. N..
    D.. R.. A..
    K.. E.. C.. L.. U.. B..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:MandrakeClub? by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      Grub, you never cease to make me laugh. The Mandrake Mouse Club... I love it

      Why thank you! Would you like my PayPal ID? ;)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  8. Re:Debian has this too. by Trick · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean those Debian guys let you tell them what packages you like without having to pay for the privilege?

    Must be a bunch of damn commies, I tell ya.

  9. Re:Money woes? by PunchMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny
    The world already boasts of several million Mandrake Linux users, and we know at least 200,000 of you. We could get over this crunch if less than 20,000 users became Silver Members of MandrakeClub.

    I guess since I run it on my desktop, and finally convinced my wife to run it on her laptop, I should cave and make that 19,999 users.
    Well... it does say if less than 20,000 users. Seems to me that 1 is less than 20,000. Register your wife and you will have single-handedly saved Mandrake! Congratulations!
    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  10. Re:Mandrake Naysayers by fritter · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just don't get you mandrake naysayers. Have you tried Mandrake 9.0? You don't have to use KDE or Gnome, it's right there in the install. The following tips will surely change a few of your minds:

    1. During installation, select "advanced" installation, rather than the default.

    2. Be sure to add "Other Window Managers" in addition to KDE & Gnome

    3. Make the selection during install that DOESN'T start X on bootup.

    4. After installation, put a .xinitrc file in your home directory. Put "exec icewm", "exec fluxbox" or whatever you like for your window manager in it.

    5. use urpmi.remove to get rid of the CD sources for package installation:

    urpmi.removemedia "Installation CD 1 (x86) (cdrom1)"
    urpmi.removemedia "Installation CD 2 (x86) (cdrom2)"
    urpmi.removemedia "International CD (x86) (cdrom3)"

    and replace them with an FTP source:
    urpmi.addmedia base-ftp ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandra ke/9.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS with ../base/hdlist.cz

    and add the contrib source:
    urpmi.addmedia contrib ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandra ke/9.0/contrib/RPMS with synthesis.hdlist2.cz

    so it never ever prompts you for CDs (assuming you've got broadband)

    Add the plf software source:
    urpmi.addmedia plf ftp://plf.chem.yorku.ca/pub/plf/9.0 with hdlist.cz

    Now, you can install just about anything you like with a simple "urpmi {package name}". For instance, if you want mutt, and you're also missing a lot of its dependencies, "urpmi mutt" will not only get mutt, but it will first get whatever is needed for mutt to run. FreeBSD addicts can surely appreciate that (ala the freebsd ports system).

    I've been running MDK9.0 since the day it was out of beta and have never had these buggy problems that some of you complain about. No window manager problems (I use fluxbox), no nvidia problems (I've played many a LAN party with my box, never had a crash during crunch time yet), no problems of any kind.

    You boneheads should give it a chance before blasting it. Don't try to use it as if it were some kind of RedHat clone, it's moved way beyond that in the last couple of years.


    Wow, it practically installs itself!

  11. Re:We all need to thank Mandrake by glwtta · · Score: 5, Funny
    Red Hat, Solaris, or Slackware that brought Linux to the masses

    No, I'm sure it was Solaris that brought linux to the masses.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  12. Re:1 CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Silly man, no one actually USES Linux for their desktop! They only dual-boot with it so they can act cool.

  13. Re:Mandrake Naysayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Foo requires blah, blah, blah. Foo sucks.

    No wonder foo is a bigger joke than bar.

    Bar sucks.

    Why do I get the impression the only reason you replied was so you could make a derisive comment about Power Macs? You make one valid point, but you kill your credibility so soundly with your wrap-up...

  14. MAN pages now politically correct. by Kahn+Verge+Hiss · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey gang, I've notice a peculiar change to the familiar MAN pages on the new version of Mandrake. I wanted to look up some SMP stuff so I typed "MAN kernel" (I'm a bit rusty), and got a weird error. "Syntax now WOman " This sounded strange to me but I though meh... I tell you, these new WOman pages are terrible! It used to be like "MAN automount" and then you've got your information. I typed "WOman kernel". Now this is weird, it said, "If you don't know what's wrong, I'm not going to tell you." I thought this was some kind of joke. I had some time, so I low-levelled and installed it again. I got the same..uh.. error? Anyways, I was able to get MAN SMP to work in the console with root access, but it didn't really get to the point, it was ambiguous, and generally frustrating to deal with. I eventually gave up and climbed in a bottle of Dubonnet red. Anyone else have any WOman problems with Mandrake 9.1b ?