EFF Report: Four Years Under the DMCA

kylus writes "The EFF has a pretty nice article entitled "Unintended Consequences." Basically, it reviews the last four years of life under the law, and how use of the "anti-circumvention" clauses have been used to stifle innovation, censor free speech, and threaten academic/scientific research. It ends with a conclusion most on /. have been dicussing for ages: "Four years of experience with the "anti-circumvention" provisions of the DMCA demonstrate that the statute reaches too far, chilling a wide variety of legitimate activities in ways Congress did not intend."" You've joined the EFF, right?

Comments

You *have* to be shitting me!

[unterderbrucke]

These problems are just uneducated judges! If these activist organizations took the time to compile a packet to educated judges instead of complaining, there would be much less misinterpratation of the law.

With my job as a police officer, I know how little the judges actually know about new laws, and often need to be educated by the lawyers about the law they are trying.

No change per se

[Gyan]

Well, the DMCA so far hasn't made a discernible difference in everyday life.

Sure, the FatWallet fiasco demonstrates the "inaneness" of the law but it hasn't affected Joe Sixpack yet.

It does affect those who directly fall in the face or corporations which generally tend to continue generating revenue from existing products instead of adapting/improving them*

*Note that this is not a slam against all these corporations. R&D is a bitch.

Re:No change per se

[whovian]

Wow. IMO, that article deserves to be published in EVERY newspaper across the US.

The internet IMHO is really one of the greatest wonders of mankind, but after skimming that, plus reading the preceeding Matt Groening interview, and the recent Lexmark toner cartridge post, I finally am persuaded that "the industry" at large plays a huge role in stifling the exchange of information and ideas. The 'net allows anyone with access to it to be like a "vendor" to the world, yet I think we have yet to see the net's full potential -- but that potential won't be realized with companies that are operating under their old business models.
As open software has shown, The People are capable innovators. Now I think there are at least two roadblocks. The first one is the ISPs (potentially) because they could in principle be mandated to regulate user content. But then users would find another, perhaps slower, way to get in touch (like networking home satellite dishes). The second is the lack of open hardware (example: last updated 2000). Of course, government and industry *could* help enable options, but they always want something in return.
So I will make my contribution of EFF soon, just not directly by credit card for fear of being tracked by the government.

Dear Moderators: I know this post has some generalizations because it's about my being persuaded, so please, I would rather you ignore my post than mod it down.

YES, I have

[Kevitt]

You've joined the EFF, right?
Yes, I have. And now I am considering ways to let those that haven't joined, or that aren't even aware of issues such as these, to become informed. My frustration is that it seems 99% of the general public is content wallow in ignorance. Not by choice, but simply by virtue of the fact that they don't read sites like /., or EFF, or attend conferences, or try to do anything that is "non-standard" with digital devices or content. They just have no interest, and so they don't realize that eventually this spills over into everyday life.

The reaction to my telling friends and associates about these things is that they look at me like I'm a nutcase (yeah ok sometimes I *am* a nutcase :p). I wish I could transform that reaction into interest.

No, I haven't.

[Jay Maynard]

I haven't joined the EFF, and I'm not going to until they change their stance on spam. They're so worried about freedom of speech they're ignoring the fact that the medium is being destroyed.

Do you know?

[epcraig]

Do you know how your legislator voted on the DMCA?

If you did, did it change your vote?

Is your future vote for or against your legislator going to depend on your legislator's opinion of the DMCA and its effects?