Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Mac vs. PC Digital Photography Comparison

Posted by michael on from the crunch-crunch-grind dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Rob Galbraith posted a comparison among two Macs and two PCs. Both a high-end Mac and PC are included with somewhat surprising results given the number of Mac zealots who will claim otherwise... optimized for PC, Mac support second, Photoshop is faster, yada, yada, yada."

4 of 513 comments (clear)

  1. Re:You are misinformed or a troll. by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 1, Troll

    " XP is better all around and should be the desktop Linux is trying to be"

    That's a troll right?

    you think Linux should aim for a UI that Microsoft outsourced to Fisher Price?..

  2. So what??? by Duncan3 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Lets see, since December 2001 (2 years)

    PC iMac
    ---- ------
    3 0 Complete rebuilds due to OS taking a shit.
    6 hrs N/A[1] Average time between crashes
    No Yes Mom could use it?
    100+ 3 Questions during OS install.
    $2,499[2] 0 Dev tools cost per user.

    [1] My iMac has NEVER crashed
    [2] Direct MS price as of Jan 13, 2002

    I would but another Mac in a nanosecond - coincidently the same amount of time that passes between thoughts of using an axe on my PC.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  3. Re:compare Apples with Apples. by pi+radians · · Score: 1, Troll

    Oh I get why this was modded as flamebait. Because the poster is comparing a PC to a Mac. Or is it because he read the article and is commenting on some of the errors in the way the comparison was handled.

    To the moderator who gave this a flamebait, please AC an explaination as to why.

    --

    sin(6cos(r)+5A)
  4. Good joke by NaCh0 · · Score: 0, Troll


    Too bad tommorrow will never come for the mac.