Slashdot Mirror


Using Anthrax To Fight Cancer

StarEmperor writes "According to this BBC news article, scientists have used a version of the anthrax toxin to kill tumors in mice. The toxin was so effective that after just one treatment tumours were reduced in size by up to 92%."

27 comments

  1. Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The toxin was so effective that after just one treatment tumours were reduced in size by up to 92%" ...but unfortunately, the scientists haven't figured out a way to keep the anthrax from killing the mice, but they remain optimistic. "The last mouse took 72 hours before it suffering respiratory failure, and tumor reduction was still 86%!"

    1. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that a troll, its funny

    2. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just see the FARK headline:

      "Doctors try to use anthrax used to treat cancer in humans - hilarity ensues"

  2. Effectiveness by JohnFluxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When something like this kills off a large percentage of cells, say even 99%, I always wonder why 1% survive - are they resistent somehow? Or the toxins can't reach those particular cells? Or what?

    1. Re:Effectiveness by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gee, I could have told you that large doses of anthrax would stop tumor growth.

      Oh, you wanted the patient to live?

      um... sorry... next comment...

      --
      My father is a blogger.
    2. Re:Effectiveness by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Paracelsus said "The Dose Makes the Poison". When you're talking Toxicology, there's all different kinds of reasons.

      • The toxin may be excreted before it can be effective
      • The toxin may be competing with a 'good' material (for instance, giving Carbon Monoxide victims Oxygen in large quantities helps reduce the effects of CO).
      • Natural flora. Our gut is infested with a broad spectrum of bacteria and microscopic critters. The homeostatic mixture of these 'bugs' keeps us healthy. When we get stomach virus or eat some bad meat, our natural flora gets disrupted and we get a 'bad poo day'.
      • The cells that make up our body vary in different types of proteins in the cell membrane. Our genes express different proteins in different cells (that's what essentially makes the difference between a brain cell and a muscle cell). When a strange protein enters the body, some won't have the right combination of defending proteins. The cells which do have the proper 'antibodies' will succeed and reproduce.


      That's the real reason that getting rid of cancer is so hard. In radiation or chemotherapy, you are trying to hit on the right combination of poison that will kill the cancer cells and leave the 'normal' cells alone. Some of the normal cells (like hair cells) do get wiped out.

      The Human Genome and the Folding At Home projects both very exciting because we're learning which genes make which proteins and which proteins work where. The more we understand the 'machine', the more likely we can turn it off, rather than smash it with a hammer...

      Sheesh, another biology lecture... Sorry, but you asked...
      --
      My father is a blogger.
    3. Re:Effectiveness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One man's flamebait is another man's funny.

    4. Re:Effectiveness by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 3, Informative

      The authors of the study have managed to modify the anthrax toxin (or one of its associated proteins?? I'm still reading the article) to specifically target the toxin to urokinase, a protein that is expressed on the cell surface. In cancerous cells, expression of this protein is dramaticly increased so the modified anthrax toxin will preferentially bind to and kill cancerous cells. Like any chemotherapy, some noncancerous cells will likely also be hit by the poison but hopefully less than in traditional chemotherapy.

  3. Update to the Article by Inexile2002 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists in the US have come forward to confirm the British findings and excitedly add that Winger, Pantera and Judas Priest have also shown promising results. Cancer patients are urged to use 80's metal with caution however, as side effects such as mullets, Pointac Firebird ownership and acid wash jeans can often overshadow the original illness.

    1. Re:Update to the Article by dpp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, and you wouldn't want to go down with a case of heavy metal poisoning.

      --
      This post is strictly my own opinion and not necessarily that of my employer.
    2. Re:Update to the Article by kingOFgEEEks · · Score: 1

      As a firebird owner, i almost take offense. Your demi-flame is quenched, however, by the following statement:

      Anyone who would like to buy a 1987 Pontiac Firebird, respond to this post. More details to follow.

      --
      mechanicos ergo cogito
  4. Gives new meaning to the phrase... by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... "the cure is worse than the disease"

  5. How this bad boy works by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anthrax is a complex of three proteins: anthrax protective antigen, edema factor, and lethal factor. Anthrax works by binding onto the surface of a cell, then an endogenous protease cleaves the protective antigen, which allows the lethal factor to enter the cell where it acts as a protease chopping up the cell's proteins (notably those involved with cellular signaling) which kills the cell. The authors of the above study have replaced the old cleavage site in the anthrax protective antigen with one that is recognized and specifically cut by urokinase, which is dramaticly upregulated in cells that are cancerous. The result is that the anthrax toxin binds cells but is only cleaved by urokinase, not by whatever was cutting it before. So cells that are making lots of urokinase (cancer cells) cut more of the anthrax protective antigen which allows more of the anthrax lethal factor to enter the cell and chop up more proteins, which kills the cell. The down side is that all cells produce some level of urokinase, so a few noncanerous cells will also be killed by the anthrax toxin, but this sounds like it could be less than traditional chemotherapy. Anyway, this is an incredibly slick idea for combating cancer!

    1. Re:How this bad boy works by Lord+Sauron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am not a doctor, but isn't urokinase produced by the kidneys ?

      If so, we can assume the kidneys have great concentrations of it, and this Anthrax treatment could harm the kidneys, leading to kidneys failure. Not so good, IMO.

    2. Re:How this bad boy works by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      I think that urokinase is produced by the kidneys, but it is taken up by the cancerous cells. Therefore, while all cells are susceptible to anthrax to some degree, the majority of the agent will target the cancer cells primarily.

      Of course, large concentrations will cause wide-spread disease, not just of the kidneys.

  6. Statistics by droyad · · Score: 4, Funny

    after just one treatment tumours were reduced in size by up to 92% . Scientist believe this was due to 92% of the rats dying and being eaten

  7. Gods, I feel Old. by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 1

    Not one comment on Scott Ian & the boys? Not even a troll?

    1. Re:Gods, I feel Old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not one comment on Scott Ian & the boys? Not even a troll?

      except this

  8. Oh, so now .... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

    North Korea and Iraq are going to claim they're just doing cancer research? "Cancer research, yeah, that's the ticket!"

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  9. isn't it interesting by Hatfieldje · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to think that this never would have been discovered if we hadn't had that Anthrax scare. I mean, you can't tell me that scientists were just sitting around and then said, "Let's see if we can alter Anthrax to kill cancer". It was more of a "Recent events have shown us that Anthrax is an efficient cell killer. Let's take it and see if we can customize it to attack cancerous cells." And then they used a characteristic that separates cancer cells from normal cells and exploit it to the benefit of man. What a great world we live in.

    It makes me happy to see scientists turn something that has been portrayed as only an indiscriminate killer (which, unaltered, it is) and use it to battle one of the body's toughest enemies.

    Bravo.

    --
    for maximum effect, the preceding post should be read monotone and at a steady cadence
  10. It goes to show... by On+Lawn · · Score: 4, Funny


    Its just one of many ways that Anthrax is like The Cure.

  11. Smokeable Anthrax... by dankjones · · Score: 1

    Cures 100% of all cancers in one good sized "spliff". Government declares "medicine isn't smoked"

  12. Maybe slashdot should clear the science section... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As /. idiots can't even write anything serious about a possible cure for cancer...

    This is an important breakthrough that could one day save your life... Still wanna joke?

  13. I think youll find.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mice got the anthrax through the post.....