Carping Over Creative Commons
scubacuda writes "Arnold Kling, in his article, Content is Crap, writes, 'While there are many Net-heads who share Dan Gillmor's [and Larry Lessig's] enthusiasm for Creative Commons, I do not. It has little or no significance, because it is based on a strikingly naive 60's-retro ideological view of how content intermediaries function.' He compares artists' works to, well, raw sewage that publishers filter into something that can be later consumed by the public. 'What Creative Commons lets you do as an author is label your stuff before you flush it down the toilet.' Kling points to Bayesian Intermediaries (filters based on flexible keyword weights and 'trained' by user preferences) and weblogs as good ways to filter out the drivel that many content creators produce. (Dan Gilmore and Siva Vaidhayanatha respond, to which Kling responds in his blog."
That pretty much dooms slashdot, don't you think?
Troll complete!
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan
Your post manages to agree with the poster by pointing out that he is full of shit.
+1 for Irony--Hell I've even got a web log in my sig, make it +2
Bill Finklebork thinks the donut he bought this morning might have been a day-old, it tasted a little stale. He also thinks that someone should be airing Beavis & Butthead in syndication.
Truly this is important to us all, as it affects society at it's very core.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
Like the FOX Network.
timothy
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
maybe this story should be called 'Crapping Over Creative Commons'
Flame.
You can check out some of my other raw crap here.
-Brett
with the primary messages: everything sux. Only big media companies know what people want.
lol
LadyStar - Your Magical and Mysterious Adventure Awaits