Slashdot Mirror


Ferroelectric Storage Density Tops 20KDVDs/Cubit^2

DeAshcroft writes "As reported in Technology Research News, researchers from Tohoku University, the Japanese National Institute for Materials Science, and Pioneer Corporation have demonstrated a prototype ferroelectric (as opposed to ferromagnetic) storage mechanism with density of 1.5 trillion dots per square inch. No word on why Japanese researchers are using square inches, but the new storage benchmark is the DVD. This is 47 DVD's in a square inch, or over 20KiloDVD's per square cubit. Original paper appeared in the Applied Physics Letters." In related memory news, an Anonymous Coward writes "It appears the the ever present pause between photo's on a digital camera might finally be fixed. A company now claims http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/102/C1396/ ) to have kicked up the write speed on a compact flash card up to 4MB/sec. This means we lesser photographers can now get the right action shot just by volume alone ;-)"

9 of 296 comments (clear)

  1. shz/in^2 by violently_ill · · Score: 5, Funny

    sure, that sounds like a lot of storage, but how many full-length german sheizer films can it hold? when will we start setting standards that are actually meaninful?

  2. Cubit^2 by GMontag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cubit^2

    This sounds like an achievement of biblical proportions!

  3. Cubits? by MrYotsuya · · Score: 5, Funny

    What the hell, is God telling them to build an ark?

    1. Re:Cubits? by Old+Wolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      And so Noah's Archive was born

  4. My DVD... by istartedi · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...gets 40 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I like it.

    Really now, the Japanese are using square inches because Americans know what a square inch is, and they do a lot of business with the USA. Seems pretty obvious to me.

    Also, they just happened to reach a "milestone" of 1.5 when measured in square inches. 1 square inch = 6.4516 square centimeters, so this is only about 0.235 per square centimeter. Maybe they should have a press release at 0.3/cm^2. But if it's less than 1, it's just not very good.

    To resolve this issue, I propose the introduction of a new unit based on the meter and corrected by a factor based on Moore's law or whatever it is that governs storage density. The correction factor should be adjusted to allow for press releases oh... say... every 3 months so that stock traders will have something to speculate about. I propose that the new units be called "Horcs" in honor of no particular person, place or thing.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  5. Transfer speed? by tigress · · Score: 4, Funny

    What I'd be interrested in is knowing how fast it reads, preferably in another sane measurement, like 8" floppies per forthnight.

  6. Re:Inches? Cubits? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those of you using sane units, this is about 250 gigabits per cm^2.

    That's 2,412.1 petanybbles per acre, for those of you who prefer units with a little character. ;-)

    --

    I write in my journal
  7. Re:Riiiiiiiight, what's a cubit? by haroldK · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Noah! Both of those DB9 connectors are Female, you have to go back and get another one!"
    "Aw, come on! Can't you just use a gender changer?"
    "You know I don't work like that."

  8. Re:Square cubit? by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why the US still clings to imperial units is beyond me.

    Duh. It's because Americans still measure everything in shitloads.