Plan for Spam, Version 2
bugbear writes "I just posted a new version of the Plan for
Spam Bayesian filtering algorithm. The big change is to mark tokens by context. The new version decreases spams missed by 50%, to 2.5 per 1000, even though spam has gotten harder to filter since the summer. I also talk about how spam will evolve, and what to do about it."
But will it enlarge my penis?
You, sir, are my hero. A true Stalin.
rm -fr ~/Mail
would do the trick.
Note to self: get smarter troll to guard door.
And the conflict rages on. The better filters we use, the sneakier the spam artists get. Now we're developing self-modifying algorithms to detect and kill spam, and I'm sure the spammers are developing self-modifying algorithms to craft filter-tricking spam.
How long before the back-and-forth of spam filters and spam crafters becomes self-aware? It's got to happen. Eventually the spam filters will become a skeptic consciousness that *feels* its way through spam and spots the phoneys, and the spam crafters will become a persuasive consciousness that tries to think and write as a close friend or relative.
...
Without spam, how else would I be able to sit home every day and make $1,000 a week watching TV while playing with my 12 inch penis?
Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
Could Bayesian filtering be applied to filter offtopic posts as well?
Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
Ooooops! Wrong window. Sorry.
Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
>Based on my corpus, "sex" indicates a .97 probability of the containing email being a spam...
Spoken like a true geek.
Why are you posting Anonymous Coward? Are you afraid someone will post your email to a few spam lists. :)
Unfortunately, it might work at first, but we've seen offtopic posters and first posters evolve. Alas, they seem to be a form of semi-intelligent life and once their numbers start to dwindle you can almost bet some internet environmentalist society will crop up and declare them endangered "where once, great herds of them swept majestically across the plains, now only a few cling to the ever encroaching egalitarian dark forces of the internet.
It's probably just easier to round them up and send them to Guantanamo.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
You don't have a problem with spam? So no one should have a problem, right? Spam does not depend solely on you doing something stupid. Any mail you send to someone could be improperly fwd'd or even posted somewhere that you don't want it to be. From there, you're screwed.
Damn AC.
"Use another account for regular everyday things, and make sure it sin't something simple like abc123@hotmail.com. I do that and never get spam to my real accounts. This whole spam thing is way overblown."
You remind me of the guy who fixed his leaky roof by using an umbrella in his house.
I don't think it would be nearly as complicated to check for duplicate posts...
Ok do the following, then maybe I'll care about your opinion: 1. Solve world hunger so tribe in africa don't need pork to survive ....
Yum, cat farms!
Tastes just like chicken, and keep down the rat population.
Meeeeeeeooowwww!
Opinions on the Twiddler2 hand-held keyboard?
Trickier than you might think considering slashdot editors spell most words in the english language with 3 or 4 incorrect variations.
Correction.. spam will never stop... ever.
.
. .
Last time I checked, murder was illegal, punishable by death in many states, yet it still occurs.
Spam is a means to an end - selling your shit to gullible people. Murder is not just a means, but an end in itself. When you want someone dead, there's not really another way around it. With spam, there's always telemarketing and pop-ups.
In addition, murder can be a crime of passion, while spamming is hardly such. I can't remember ever thinking "Oh that bastard cut me off! I'll help him increase his penis size, then give him a work-at-home job! Oh I'm JUST SOOOO ANGRY!"
± 29 dB