FInland Proposes Editorial Culpability for Web Content

Sandstorm writes "Electronic Frontier Finland ry has an interesting article about a proposed law in the Finnish parliament on liabilities in public communications. Among other alarming things, the proposed law would require all web publications to have an editor-in-chief, who would have a criminal responsibility for all material published in his publication. That would include discussion on web boards and force editors on sites like /. preview and censor all comments before displaying them."

Comments

just dumb

[retards]

I really wonder about laws of this kind. Do the lawmakers really think about the implications of this? I don't mean that "Big Brother"-shit, I mean, people will not abide by this law because it is too cumbersome. People will not archive every revision of their personal homepage just because they happen to have a small webserver and the law says they have to. I sure as hell won't. Come arrest me.

This kind of civil disobedience may seem trivial, but what happens when lots of people lose respect for the law in other areas because they deem (correctly) that the lawmakers are totally clueless about modern society?

When will politicans realize we cannot have an Orwellian government AND an informed and educated population AND a market economy at the same time? IDIOTS!

...interprets censorship as damage and ...

[unitron]

Okay, so Finland won't have any decent web sites anymore, but do they think that they can either impose this law on sites in other countries (rotsa ruck) or block access for the entire nation to sites in other countries? What if someone makes a long distance call to a dial up provider in France or Sweden or wherever? (Yeah I know that gets expensive really fast but some people will do it anyway.) Even China's having trouble keeping their people from checking out un-authorized sites, how's a country like Finland where the populace doesn't fear a bullet in the back of the head for any little infraction going to handle the uproar over blocked sites? It's not as though they can keep people from finding out that there are sites to which they are being denied access.