Cross-Site-TRACE
quackking writes "Uh-oh! Looks bad for RFC 2068! Kudos to WhiteHat out of Santa Clara, CA for this one. ALL current web servers comply with this RFC, which means they ALL are vulnerable to this newly named attack - XST - cross-site-trace.
When misused, TRACE, part of the HTTP protocol, allows an unauthorized script to be passed to a Web server for execution even if the server is secured against running such scripts. Even devices like web-managed routers are open to this."
sure beats tel-sell...
Machine9dotNet
Seems to use neither science nor fiction.
I find that most stories I peruse contain such far-out "scientific principles" that the events that occur could never happen anywhere on this planet.
Then again, some parts (even in Doctorow's 0wnz0red series) are simply stolen facts from things that have already happened and been talked about in the news.
I find it ironic that the best new science fiction works are not science and barely contain any fiction.
Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
first off, i remember when slashdot posted his short story "0wnz0red", and i really enjoyed reading it...
secondly, not that i'm saying i'm cheap or anything, but why would i go buy the book, when i just downloaded the pdf for free?
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
When this was a physical magazine, it was one of the most fun, intelligent and readable cyber magazines ever. I bought my copies at the short lived Binary Cafe in Toronto (three computers on dialup to the net...) - and now I can't find them.
/. effect ends.)
Kind of like Mondo 2000, Wired and National Lampoon (jeez - anyone here remember when those were good?) all rolled into one. Now it's a web site and a HECK of a mail list.
Highly recommended and I'm looking forward to DLing the book. (As soon as the
It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
Supprisingly, while the click to page view is a little slow, the site is holding well under the strain. And my d/l of the book screamed. Someone was ready :)
Started reading the prolouge on the screen, but just decided to print it out. Starting out as a neat story. Although the continued lack of specifics might drive me nuts.
It would appear that the publishing industry and the recording industry are similar in that they are difficult to get into and tend to "stiff" new artists/authors. Of course the recording industry is difficult to get into because they're looking for the next 18-24 year old Britney Spears clone and the publishing industry is difficult to get into unless your work has something that will sell (for sci-fi your works these days either have to be attached to a franchise or be militaristic in nature).
The main difference, as far as I can see, is that this author and, say, Bruce Eckel, is that they also publish their works through major book publishers. There's lots of websites wherein you can download the entire CD of a small artist, usually the ones who press their own albums on CD-R. But as soon as these guys sign to a major record label, this practice goes away. How it is that TOR is allowing Doctrow to do this is beyond me. No way would they let Robert Jordan release Wheel of Time 10 this way.
But something occured to me - this is a book that's like 136 pages (though Amazon says the hardcover is 208). And it's being published in hardcover for $22.95. That's more than most DVD's or CD's. You can usually pick it up for less than that, but doesn't that seem a little pricey to anyone else? I know that hardcover first issue books are steep, like $29.95 for Wheel of Time 10, but that's a 700 page book whose target audience is rabid about it. Shouldn't a 136 page hardcover book be a little cheaper?
Even better question - how come no one complains about this? People complain about the price of a lot of things - CD's, DVD's, Movies, etc. but they never complain about the price of books. Of course you can download your music if you really want to, you can wait for the movie to hit DVD, you can download the DivX of the movie/DVD if you can find it, and the DVD is loaded down with extras so you don't feel jipped. Could uneasy accessibility to books in digital form be the reason no one complains about their prices?
And what will this do to the mix? Will authors release their material this way in the future in the hopes that being noticed will land them a book deal so they can sell copies to all of those who want a keepsake of something they read for free? Will this guy sell a ton of copies of this book because he was on a Slashdot story? Will this work on a fiction document (Eckel's works are programming books)?
Can the recording industry learn a thing or two from the publishing industry? Or is it the other way around? And whose cause does it help if the Slashdot community buys a ton of this book?
Schnapple
Check out http://average.matrix.net/Daily/markR.html if you want to really see whats going on in detail.
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
Don't know if this is the reason for the internet slowdown right now but it seems likely, from about a few hours ago I've getting tons of incoming traffic on port 1434 which I believe is the port that MS SQL listens on. So it's probably another exploit on MS sever software.
From the article: users of both Internet Explorer and Netscape are equally at risk to the same vectors of attack.
will it effect Opera browser?
.
#3 pencils and quadrille pads.
Sure you stop being able to view many sites, but most of those sites that lock you out when you don't have this stuff on are full of junk anyway.
4 23&pub=osdn&num="+prInst+"&size=728_90&code=no&red ir="+pr_redir+"&defredir="+pr_redir_def+"&r="+Math .random();
For the last couple of weeks, IE has been popping up warnings that my security settings may not allow Slashdot to display properly, because I don't have ActiveX scripting enabled. I do allow Slashdot to use Javascript, but don't allow everything it wants to do.
The stupid warnings are really irritating, but the only things I'm losing are the banner ads at the top of the page. I think the offending code is this:
var prs="ads.PointRoll.com/PRServe/?ad=424m2002121917
document.write("<scr"+"ipt language='JavaScript' src='http://"+prs+"'></scr"+"ipt>");
Any suggestions on how to get rid of this irritant?