TWIRL: Are 1024-bit RSA Keys Unsafe?
This came across the
Interesting-People list
today: a
preliminary draft of a paper,
co-authored by Adi Shamir, that proposes new hardware for factoring large numbers. It is claimed that a machine could be built which would be "3-4 orders of magnitude more cost effective than the best previously published designs," and that "the NFS sieving step for 1024-bit RSA keys can be completed in less than a year by a $10M device." For background, here's a
primer
on key length in symmetric and asymmetric crypto.
SWORDFISH
Don't go telling anyone.
"Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
A $10,000,000 machine dedicated to breaking into a single encrypted communication for a full year will be able to break it! This makes encryption completely worthless!
-- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
Coca-Cola!
Can it factor large primes in mere seconds? I've designed a processor that can! I'm just looking for investors now...
Of course they are. I just read an article the other day on how to file them down and make a master key out of them.
;)
Slashdot and their damn dupes
From now on I shall encrypt my posts by mee mmoo un weedle dhodhe unbvoppe zzfp dee. ;)
size matters.
I bet NSA have had this for years.
Imagine a beowulf cluster of these . Hmmmm you could crack God's answering machine remote . Think of the messages "Hello God this is Satan you think i could be someone else besides Bill Gates for awhile . I hate being so damn nerdy. Oh an i was thinking we could give the DOJ the plague or maybe just the antitrust section . Gotta get back to my new version of windows for life support machines ....muhahahaha "