Slashdot Mirror


P2P File Sharing Could Cost You A Bundle

geekee writes "CNET posted an article claiming you could be liable for $250,000 in fines and up to 3 years in prison for p2p file sharing. This is due to an obscure law called the No Electronic Theft (NET) act passed in 1997 (signed by Bill Clinton). Although the Justice Department has not prosecuted anyone under this new law, some members of congress have asked John Ashcroft to begin prosecuting. In response to the request, John Malcolm, a deputy assistant attorney general, said to expect some NET Act prosecutions."

12 of 789 comments (clear)

  1. That does it... by DarkHand · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm moving to Russia where it's more free.

  2. Re:Bring it on by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll go to jail for what I believe in. .. said the anonymous coward.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  3. Re:My Theory by NineNine · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you put "loose" in quotes because you couldn't spell it, or you weren't sure what it meant? Kiddo, you need to spend less time on Kazaa, and more with a good book.

  4. Why stop? by Senator_B · · Score: 5, Funny

    " It doesn't matter if you've forsworn Napster, uninstalled Kazaa and now are eagerly padding the record industry's bottom line by snapping up $15.99 CDs by the cartload. Be warned--you're what prosecutors like to think of as an unindicted federal felon."

    So in essence, theres no reason for me to stop, now that I've already started.

  5. Woah, I dodged a bullet there! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "CNET posted an article claiming you could be liable for $250,000 in fines and up to 3 years in prison for p2p file sharing"

    Good thing I'm a leecher!

  6. Swiss army knife by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course the Swiss don't have this problem. Their government REQUIRES them each to have a machine gun (or some other piece of large-scale military nastiness) handy. B-)

    Well, a little red knife, anyway.


    Or the big red knife:
    - Tiny little scisors
    - Tiny little screwdriver
    - Tiny little tommygun
    - Tiny little satelite uplink
    - Tiny little antitank missile
    - Tiny little tactical nuke ...

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  7. Statute of Limitations by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    So in essence, theres no reason for me to stop, now that I've already started.

    No, there is. IIRC, there's a three year statute of limiations on copyright violations, criminal or civl. (IANAL, duh)

    Stop _right now_, and the chances of you getting smacked for P2P start decreasing by 0.09% every day.

  8. Re:Any Risk Downloading Out-of-Print Titles? by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

    First, in re: the NET Act, what is the "retail value" of an out-of-print title? My assumption is that it is zero, otherwise the record co., in this case CBS/Sony, would market it.

    I think you've really got something there. It wouldn't take much to convince a jury and a judge that the value of those mp3s is $0.00 simply because it's out of print.

    Cross examining the label, "Why is this CD out of print?" "Because it wouldn't be financially benefitial to print it" "Are you saying that it would cost more to print the CD than it would make?" "Yes"

    Then while questioning you, "I understood you burned these mp3s to a CD?" "Yes" "How much did that cost you?" "50 cents" "It cost you 50 cents to create this CD?" "Yes"

    In summation, "You've heard testimony that it would cost more to print the CD than they'd make selling it. My client printed this CD for 50 cents. These mp3s are worth less than 50 cents.. I'd say my client is guilty! Guilty of stealing 50 cents. I implore the jury to right this injustice, and demand that my client pay back that 50 cents to the record label"

    The precedent set would be wonderful.

  9. Re:Funny by VivianC · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, the Swiss had a public referendum on joining the UN. It won in a squeaker: 12 cantons (like US states) for, 11 cantons against.

    Yeah, but that last canton had a huge number of disputed votes mistakenly cast for Pat Buchanan!

    --
    Viv

    Gmail invites for ip
  10. Re:Code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act by SoupaFly · · Score: 4, Funny

    I watched it happen before -- the Scientologists use this technical extensively. The idea of a lawsuit, according to Hubbard, was not to win, but to harrass, to intimidate, to bankrupt, to exhaust, to ruin. In advanced cases, the broken victim can even be brought on board the attacker's cause, as a requirement for cessation of legal attacks. Oh, and gag clauses for the poor schmuck is standard as well.

    You've just slandered the Church! We'll see you in court. Have a nice day.

    -- I bent my Wookie

  11. Re:So don't use Kazaa... by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    WinXP does support encrypted file systems. How secure is it though?

    Damn, wish I had mod points. That definitely rates a +1 funny!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  12. A Surefire way to... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Funny

    A surefire way [no guarantees etc.] to avaid prosecution: Change your Kazaa Username to "Bobby-Sue," "Stargurl," or "Spiceworld47893."

    Basically anything that suggests you're a blonde, pretty teenage girl. There's no fucking way the RIAA et al. are going to sue someone like that; the publicity would decimate them.

    Oh... you might have to stop sharing all those German Leather Dungeon mpegs, though, just to keep up the facade.
    Although, who the fuck knows what teenage girls are into these days...

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce