Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Microsoft Blasted For Lax Security

Posted by timothy on from the they're-also-the-biggest-target-though dept.

fducky writes "Once again Microsoft is blasted for lax security. This CNN article cites experts denouncing the recent Microsoft security efforts as rating an 'F'. The recent MS-SQL worm got this most recent round of MS bashing going. Google News has more stories on the subject."

1 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. How the public responds by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The internet is becoming more and more important to the average "joe." So now, "things internet" are becoming newsworthy.

    I have discussed the recent worm attack with my non-tech associates and they actually had an opinion about Microsoft. That some agreed with me and others disagreed isn't as significant as the fact that they had an opinion.

    This is a tremendous change. Think on it.

    Some people strongly disagreed on Microsoft and how evil they are. Others nodded as if to say what I mentioned made a lot of sense. (I mentioned that "bugs" in software are part of Microsoft's business model -- people have to buy newer software to repair problems with their old software, especially after Microsoft stops supplying fixes for their older stuff... "Bugs == consumer incentive to upgrade.") This, of course, is now changing rapidly. "Bugs == consumer incentive to change."

    I think with the high-profile nature of attacks which exploit weaknesses in Microsoft products is really starting to create public opinion that never truly existed before. (Prior to this, people looked on Microsoft the way we look at the air we breathe -- "is there anything else to breathe?")

    I think this is a very good thing. It more than levels the playing field in the market for server and other products. I think leveraging Linux, Apache and various SQL servers in the server market is the only way to get Linux onto the Desktop at a later date. There is no way to get Linux onto the desktop until Linux is a household word. Once that is done, Desktop Linux will be chosen not for its performance, but for it's reliability and solidity.

    I think the days are short for people who prefer to have "unstable and colorful" displays... with the amazing power of today's PC, performance isn't an issue. Stability, reliability and security will be the main concern and even if Microsoft cleans up their act, their reputation will be enough to add doubt into consumers' hearts. The public is a moody beast and once bitten doesn't come back for any reason... usually. Just look at how long it took Nixon to return.

    The death of Microsoft is at hand...