Columbia Coverage
ke4roh writes "Space.com offers a list of questions and answers about the events and hardware surrounding Columbia's destruction Saturday. They address suspected causes, foam, tile, and some of the alternatives had NASA known the ship would not be able to re-enter the atmosphere." viewstyle writes "PC Magazine has a pack of stuff put together on the space shuttle accident, as they recognized the fact that the space program inspired a lot of tech people in general. What's pretty cool is the section written by a guy there who worked on the computer components in the shuttle." And naturally, the idea of a space elevator is back in vogue again.
zet is not funny!
I'm still waiting for the claims that anti-semetic NASA officials just wanted to kill the Israeli astronaut. I thought the parent would get there eventually, but stopped just short.
A graphical representation thereof
I've been hearing a lot about the 30 seconds of telemetry that was too weak for the computers to display during the shuttle break-up but that is now being analyzed from backups. Does anybody have any more information on what this data?
"Allah akbar!"
"All things considered, the shuttle is an extremely well built and carefully looked after machine with an exceptional safety and performance record. I don't feel anyone is at fault for what happened... it was just the luck of the draw."
Excptional safety record... provided you take that in context. There have bee about a hundered shuttle missions and two of them have resulted in the catastrophic loss of the spacecraft, a one in fifty chance of total failure isn't exactly stellar.
That said, we have to look at what they're doing... Those things are flying gas bombs that we lob into orbit, and then try to bring back in one piece. That we have a working re-usable spacecraft at all is still impressive.