Slashdot Mirror


Jack Valenti's Views On The Digital Age

ditogi writes "The Harvard Political Review did a quick interview with the lord of darkness himself, Jack Valenti. He gives his thoughts on government mandated copy prevention, fair use, and lobbying. In response to his famous 'VCR is [to the movie industry]...as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone.' quote, he responds, 'I wasn't opposed to the VCR.' And what does he think of his current job? 'I think lobbying is really an honest profession.'" My favorite quote: "In the digital world, we don't need back-ups, because a digital copy never wears out. It is timeless." Update: 02/05 20:05 GMT by T : Derek Slater writes "I'm the author of the Valenti article you guys linked to. I've made some brief comments about it on my site, and figured I'd send them along."

2 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. "Fair use is not a law" by TheFrood · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the interview:

    HPR: The MPAA has backed several bills mandating copy prevention technologies. Critics have lambasted these bills for curbing consumer's "fair use" rights, including the ability to make back-up copies. How can we balance the interests of consumers and the movie industry?

    JV: What is fair use? Fair use is not a law. There's nothing in law.


    Bullshit, Jack. It's right here: US Code: Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107.

    TheFrood
    --
    If you say "I'll probably get modded down for this..." then I will mod you down.
  2. Valenti is unaware of copyright statutes by yerricde · · Score: 5, Informative
    Jack Valenti said:
    What is fair use? Fair use is not a law. There's nothing in law.

    He obviously has not read Title 17, United States Code, the statutes that specify copyright law in the United States. If he had, he would have seen section 107, which tells the judge what four factors to look at.

    And one of the four factors is commercial exploitation. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing. If a work is out of print or otherwise not being exploited, then it'd probably be possible for a defendant's counsel to argue that by taking the work out of print, the copyright owner has admitted that the work has negligible market value, that unauthorized copying could not possibly diminish the market value, and that the use of such material is more likely to be fair.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?