Slashdot Mirror


Meteorite Bowling

La Camiseta writes "According to this article from the Guardian Unlimited Observer, some members of the Salt Lake Astronomical Society want to drop bowling balls from airplanes onto the Utah salt flats to simulate meteorites falling. Unfortunately, it's hit a few snags."

51 comments

  1. Alternative funding: RIAA by TripleA · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could be dropping Ipod's and other mp3 players instead. I guess that would recieve some attention... "First mp3 player in space bombs".
    Of course, it wouldn't really be in space. But who trusts newspaper headlines anyway?

  2. Stupid! by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Snags??? I suppose you mean the TOWN under the area they wanted to drop the balls on. Doh!

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:Stupid! by TheJesusCandle · · Score: 3, Funny

      Snags??? I suppose you mean the TOWN under the area they wanted to drop the balls on. Doh!

      Well, that shouldn't be a problem... a 4,000 mile-per-hour bowling ball probably wouldn't have any problem plowing straight through any snags that got in the way.

  3. They wanna drop what?! by dacarr · · Score: 3, Funny
    Look, if the winds at high altitudes can knock a 747 off course (which can be corrected), isn't it possible for those winds to knock a bowling ball or a shotput or a rock off course?

    On the other hand, I suppose if they get a little bit of english on the ball....

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:They wanna drop what?! by KDan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually an airplane is *far* more likely to be blown off course by wind than a bowling ball, because unlike the bowling ball it's designed to be affected by "wind blowing" - otherwise it couldn't take advantage of the Bernoulli effect and lift off.

      A bowling ball, on the other hand, though it could maybe technically be affected by the bernoulli effect (ping pong balls are, after all...), has a much smaller surface area to weight ratio.

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    2. Re:They wanna drop what?! by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I suppose if they get a little bit of english on the ball....

      ..they'd have to wipe it off. You have a very dirty mind!

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    3. Re:They wanna drop what?! by TheJesusCandle · · Score: 1

      A bowling ball, on the other hand, though it could maybe technically be affected by the bernoulli effect (ping pong balls are, after all...), has a much smaller surface area to weight ratio.

      A bowling ball doesnt seem like all that great of a simulation, though i can see how it would be usefull. All the meteorites ive seen have had very irregular surfaces, wouldnt that affect the way it flies through the air? And think of all the complicated fluid dynamics stuff you would have to deal with if you wanted to simulate a meteorite that was melted during entry into the atmosphere.

    4. Re:They wanna drop what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Meteorites don't exist until something large and round hits the ground.

    5. Re:They wanna drop what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bernoulli effect in relation to aircraft lift is a "Lies to children" form of areodynamics. The reality is MUCH more complex - see the Navier-Stokes partial differential equations. They normally can only be approximately solved numerically.

      The lie to children is "the upper surface of the wing is longer, so air moves faster, and faster gas has lower presure, so there is an upward force on the wing". Actually, most real wings work by shedding vortices downwards at the rear edge of the wing, generating an upward reaction force - the upper air DOES move faster, so when it rejoins the slower air behind the wing in a turbulent mixing condition, the fluid flow starts to rotate (think of how a tank turns), and spins downwards.

    6. Re:They wanna drop what?! by KDan · · Score: 1

      Ok, whatever, I didn't take the Fluid Dynamics minor option during my degree, so sue me :-P (I do remember hearing something to the effect of what you're saying above though)

      Maybe change "Lies to children" to "Lies to people who haven't studied Fluid Dynamics to grad level" :-P

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    7. Re:They wanna drop what?! by qnxdude · · Score: 0

      Bernoulli effect? try Coanda effect.. Bernoulli effect is just a cheap gr 12 explaination..

    8. Re:They wanna drop what?! by Criton · · Score: 1

      Accually planes don't make use of the vortexs for added lift they'er parisitic drag in planes. Some plane have winglets to reduce these vortexs and thus the drag. But insects do make use of vortexs to gain lift in flight it explains why a bumble bee can fly and fly very well. The insect will twist it's wing casting off a vortex just before the up stroke and accually makes lift because of the reduced pressure from the vortex . About 45% of total lift in insect fight is in the up stroke because of this. Birds are also suspected for using similair priciples in certain modes of flight.

  4. When I was young... by KDan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I used to think that toilets on airplanes were like the toilets on train - open underneath.

    That would make for some interesting meteorites no?

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
    1. Re:When I was young... by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's happened.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  5. Simulations Gone Awry by Jamuraa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would think that these smart people would realize that simulating a meteorite impact would need something other than bowling balls. Doesn't the composition of such fast-moving objects make some difference in how they bounce? Last time I checked, meteors aren't made of bowling balls. Plus I can imagine why everyone in utah would want to be on the government's side on this. Sure, dropping things from planes is cool, but what if it lands on your wife. (Mabye that's why they have spares in utah)

    Sounds like a group of crackpots to me - not that there's anything wrong with crackpots mind you. There has to be someone around to go wild about free energy theories and such. Just wait until one of them is right. (Little do we know, many have already been right, but they've been carted off to the island)

    --
    You can't see this if you have sigs turned off.
    1. Re:Simulations Gone Awry by Bastian · · Score: 3, Funny

      but what if it lands on your wife.

      Like we say in Nevada, better a few snags than a few hags.

  6. They need to talk to someone with experience... by foistboinder · · Score: 2, Funny

    The should contact David Letterman - he has all sorts of experience with this sort of stuff.

  7. INCOMMING!!!! by docbrown42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Duck and Cover!!!

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  8. It's been done by VikingBerserker · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Released high in the atmosphere, the balls would reach the same velocity as a meteorite. Then we would discover if they bounced off, punched through or exploded,'

    I went to college with a guy who tried a similar experiment with a bowling ball and my dorm. Oddly enough, he was the one that was bounced.

  9. its.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess.. dropping bowling balls from high altitude is ILLEGAL in UTAH.. ?

  10. Wiggins! by Ydna · · Score: 2, Funny

    'We're not stupid,' added Wiggins.

    All I could think of after reading the article was Chief Wiggins and Ralph dropping heavy things out of an airplane.

    "Dropping things is fun, huh daddy?"

    --

    "The great thing about multitasking is that several things can go wrong at once." -me

    1. Re:Wiggins! by cryptor3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I thought the same thing when I saw that. Of course his name is Wiggum, not Wiggins.

    2. Re:Wiggins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mind can only keep track of so many things at any given time. Your attention is a limited resource. It is no coincidence things remind you of television because that is what your attention has been saturated with. Instead of making associations with events that have occured in reality, your mind retrieves what you've seen on television.

      In this way, you become that of which you're immersed. It's not because anything is wrong with you, just the way our minds work. Human beings are fragile in many ways, and must protect the mind from injury just as one protects any other part of the body.

  11. Famous Last Words: by NegativeK · · Score: 2, Funny

    I got it!

    --
    This statement is false.
    1. Re:Famous Last Words: by keller · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some time ago, a commercial appeared on tv here in Denmark. It was a man trying to load a bowling ball into his car, while parked on a fairly steep road. Of course the ball falls out, and rolls down the street. A man on the road signals that he 'got it' and when it comes he kicks it with all he's got... Of course the camera turns away so you don't see it, but every time you imagine how much it hurts to kick a BBall... It's followed by the punchline "need glasses?" or something and is promoting a national chain of opticians.
      I laughed my ass of first time I saw it. Still stings every time though, you just know that he hasn't got a non-fractured bone left in the foot!

      --

      Enig? Det alt for hot det smor!

  12. hitting a few snags... by gnovos · · Score: 3, Funny

    some members of the Salt Lake Astronomical Society want to drop bowling balls from airplanes onto the Utah salt flats to simulate meteorites falling. Unfortunately, it's hit a few snags

    Well, that shouldn't be a problem... a 4,000 mile-per-hour bowling ball probably wouldn't have any problem plowing straight through any snags that got in the way.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:hitting a few snags... by gnovos · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it's hit a few snags

      Well, that shouldn't be a problem... a 4,000 mile-per-hour bowling ball probably wouldn't have any problem plowing straight through any snags that got in the way.


      Oh, maybe they mean unfortunate for the snags....

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  13. Why the hell not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is practical science and they'll get a real understanding of some physics out of it. As the article says, they're planning on dropping several objects, maybe even a real meteorite.

    It's a chance to for the practical study of impact physics and craters. Actually, the scientist in me wants to know what happens if they dropped a much larger rock or boulder (several tons) from a high-altitude plane. The energies involved would be much more interesting than the 20-lb objects they've been talking about.

    Of course they're going to take precautions and make sure that nobody gets killed by falling rocks - but the public gut reaction is often to treat such quirky experiments as acts of insanity or vandalism.

    On a lighter note, I'm actually suprised the military has never (to my knowledge?) investigated the "dropping rocks out of airplanes" destructive technology. :)

    1. Re:Why the hell not? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      On a lighter note, I'm actually suprised the military has never (to my knowledge?) investigated the "dropping rocks out of airplanes" destructive technology. :)

      And what, exactly, do you think the "xyz pound gravity bombs" they used in Afghanistan are? Slightly more efficient than a rock, but the idea is the same.

  14. What about shooting them? by Atomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not a phsyics expert, so this may be a stupid question...

    Couldn't you just fly a lot lower an shoot things, like maybe start with potatos?

    1. Re:What about shooting them? by kigrwik · · Score: 1

      Not likely because of the recoil: the same energy you appy to your bowling bowl going *down* will be applied to your aircraft going *up*. It is safer to climb higher and to drop the thing.

      If you shoot the thing at 300m/s (around mach 1 which is quite high for a bowling ball :), you'll get a kinetic energy of 1/2 m v^2. (where m=mass of the thing and v=300m/s).

      If you simply drop it, the gravitatioal potential energy is mgh (where m=mass of the thing , h=height and g=gravitational acceleration). Thus in order to get the same effect, you write .5mv^2=mgh , thus
      h=.5v^2/g which leads to h=4500m.

      The real computation is a bit more complicated since you add the resistance of the air, which is a function of both altitude (air pressure) and speed.

      BTW: am I the only one thinking of a 2-ounce squirrel carrying a 1 pound coconut ? :-D

      --
      -- don't discount flying pigs until you have good air defense
  15. Duh. by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...some members of the Salt Lake Astronomical Society want to drop bowling balls from airplanes..."

    Who doesn't?

  16. Bernoulli not by MacAndrew · · Score: 2, Informative

    An object falling through wind shear accelerates up to the speed of the air mass, like a boat in a current. How quickly it does so depends on the object's mass and drag. A bowling ball is pretty dense (hard to accelerate) and low drag (hard to accelerate), and it won't even be in the air very long. Airplanes are mostly air, thus lots of cross section, so they pretty much instantly become part of the air movement. However, they also (hopefully) have more than enough thrust to pick their own heading.

    The big deal with the Norden bombsight was its oversold ability to compensate for airspeed (the inital velocity and vector of the bomb) and wind speed/direction after the bomb was released. The same would be true of the bowling ball. I'd think the meteor would have a higher terminal velocity -- some of them are basically chunks of metal.

    Incidentally, the Bernoulli effect is only a percentage of a wing's lift. I figured out recently that the textbooks make this hard to understand by always depicting the airfoil at a zero angle of attack, at which few planes could stay aloft. Military jets and aerobatic planes and paper airplanes don't rely on it as much, and most planes can fly upside-down provided the gas and oil keep flowing....

  17. Why an airplane anyway ? by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ok, things falling through an atmosphere hit a terminal velocity (depending on it's weight to wind resistance, etc.) as it falls....

    Calculate the altitude that a bowling ball will reach terminal velocity, add 100 ft. or so, then just launch it that high using a trebuchette (better than a PC), a rocket, or something like that. I would guess that it would only take 100-200 ft to reach terminal velocity anyway, so what do you need the airplane and the extra altitude for

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  18. Salt Lakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Salt Lake City is a very beautiful place to fly through, especially in the winter.

    Delta has a hub there and the prices are good.

    The lakes have lots of pretty colors in the winter and the mountains are amazing, coming right up out of the plains.

    Sig: Please try to keep posts on topic. Well, I did get airplanes and the Salt Lake. That's better than most!

  19. Terminal Velocity by lirkbald · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I found a terminal velocity calculator here. I don't feel like hunting up exact numbers, but it looks like a bowling ball isn't gonna manage much more than a few hundred miles an hour. Meteors start out going much faster than that.

    This "experiment" has no bearing the behavior of meteors. Sounds like these guys should go review basic physics before they propose dangerous experiments.

    1. Re:Terminal Velocity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but they need some excuse, and dropping bowling balls out of a plane is fun.

  20. Wiggum* by cornjchob · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're reading /. and don't know how to spell the name of a Simpson's character? I hope you live in the part of Utah that will allow this to happen. :p

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  21. Well... by cornjchob · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess dropping bowling balls from planes is right up the insane person's alley. Sometimes one just needs an open frame of mind to understand things of this magnitude. I don't see the problem here; I think these people would spare no expense to ensure these bowling balls wouldn't strike anyone.

    I'll bet the council that makes the decision will have a 7-10 split as to wether or not this should be allowed to happen. Those turkeys.

    Well just mod me -7 pun.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    1. Re:Well... by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Danger! Danger! Parent is punning! Defenestrate him before he puns again!

      --
      This sig no verb.
    2. Re:Well... by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shut up you pin head.

    3. Re:Well... by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

      Since Utah won't let them drop bowling balls, I wonder if anybody has thought of dropping bowling balls in Brunswick, Maryland?

      --
      It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  22. but they slow down by upper · · Score: 2, Informative

    Small meteors slow down to terminal velocity as they fall. Big ones don't slow down that much. I'm pretty sure that bowling balls qualify as small for this purpose.

    1. Re:but they slow down by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that bowling balls qualify as small for this purpose.

      Bowling balls are only "small" if you're above them looking down. LOL

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:but they slow down by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      ALL meteors slow down, even big meteors. Friction is nasty. Even without this, the experiement will still be helpfull. So maybe we do not learn as much about the big meteors, we still would learn about the smaller ones. Yes, it may not tell us how to avoid killer meteors/comets/ what have you, but it will teach us more about the universe.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:but they slow down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This won't teach us anything more about impact dynamics than 50 years of simulations and experiments have.

  23. Gravity Bomb is explosive. by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 1
    Uh, no.

    A Gravity bomb is explosive delivered to the destination by gravity, it is not inert metal that damages things solely by landing on them.

    Gravity bombs make a big boom.

  24. Everyone does. by vidnet · · Score: 1
    As Wiggins said: 'Everyone likes to drop things from planes.'

    God, I wish I had this guy's job.

  25. Hot air balloons/helicopters by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Why don't they use hot air balloons or helicopters instead?

    Compared to planes it should be easier to find the stuff, plus you can do more controllable tests.

    --
    1. Re:Hot air balloons/helicopters by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      But you can get more bowling balls in the back of, say, a Hercules. I have this vision now of a Herkybird doing that insane shove-the-food-parcels-out-the-back manoeuvre - only with bowling balls. That's a whole lotta bowling balls.

      Science be damned, this is fun. Anyone sponsor me for a C-130 type rating? Anyone?