Slashdot Mirror


Sony Combines Pocket Drive with 802.11

Ernest writes "They presented this at Net&Com 2003 in Tokyo. I've found this announcement in German at ComputerWoche Sony selected Linux as the file server's operating system. They'll start selling this little 390 gram thing on the japanese market at the end of March for 585$. Inside is a 20GB 2.5" disk of which (only) 17GB will be available for files."

13 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Using a Sony Pocket Drive with 802.11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I had the pleasure of obtaining the early post. Thank you very much, I'll be here all week.

  2. weenie by Bastian · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Watch me do it with my real name.

    FOURTH POST!!!!

  3. Freebsd is D - E - A - D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dying

  4. United States of America Has Gone Mad ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This article was originally published on The Times Online

    You can read it at Common Dreams website

    I am copying and pasting the text here for benefit of /. readers (copyright of The Times, contains some compelling arguments):

    Published on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 by the Times/UK
    The United States of America Has Gone Mad
    by John le Carré

    America has entered one of its periods of historical madness, but this is the worst I can remember: worse than McCarthyism, worse than the Bay of Pigs and in the long term potentially more disastrous than the Vietnam War.

    The reaction to 9/11 is beyond anything Osama bin Laden could have hoped for in his nastiest dreams. As in McCarthy times, the freedoms that have made America the envy of the world are being systematically eroded. The combination of compliant US media and vested corporate interests is once more ensuring that a debate that should be ringing out in every town square is confined to the loftier columns of the East Coast press.

    The imminent war was planned years before bin Laden struck, but it was he who made it possible. Without bin Laden, the Bush junta would still be trying to explain such tricky matters as how it came to be elected in the first place; Enron; its shameless favouring of the already-too-rich; its reckless disregard for the world's poor, the ecology and a raft of unilaterally abrogated international treaties. They might also have to be telling us why they support Israel in its continuing disregard for UN resolutions.

    But bin Laden conveniently swept all that under the carpet. The Bushies are riding high. Now 88 per cent of Americans want the war, we are told. The US defence budget has been raised by another $60 billion to around $360 billion. A splendid new generation of nuclear weapons is in the pipeline, so we can all breathe easy. Quite what war 88 per cent of Americans think they are supporting is a lot less clear. A war for how long, please? At what cost in American lives? At what cost to the American taxpayer's pocket? At what cost -- because most of those 88 per cent are thoroughly decent and humane people -- in Iraqi lives?

    How Bush and his junta succeeded in deflecting America's anger from bin Laden to Saddam Hussein is one of the great public relations conjuring tricks of history. But they swung it. A recent poll tells us that one in two Americans now believe Saddam was responsible for the attack on the World Trade Centre. But the American public is not merely being misled. It is being browbeaten and kept in a state of ignorance and fear. The carefully orchestrated neurosis should carry Bush and his fellow conspirators nicely into the next election.

    Those who are not with Mr Bush are against him. Worse, they are with the enemy. Which is odd, because I'm dead against Bush, but I would love to see Saddam's downfall -- just not on Bush's terms and not by his methods. And not under the banner of such outrageous hypocrisy.

    The religious cant that will send American troops into battle is perhaps the most sickening aspect of this surreal war-to-be. Bush has an arm-lock on God. And God has very particular political opinions. God appointed America to save the world in any way that suits America. God appointed Israel to be the nexus of America's Middle Eastern policy, and anyone who wants to mess with that idea is a) anti-Semitic, b) anti-American, c) with the enemy, and d) a terrorist.

    God also has pretty scary connections.
    In America, where all men are equal in His sight, if not in one another's, the Bush family numbers one President, one ex-President, one ex-head of the CIA, the Governor of Florida and the ex-Governor of Texas.

    Care for a few pointers? George W. Bush, 1978-84: senior executive, Arbusto Energy/Bush Exploration, an oil company; 1986-90: senior executive of the Harken oil company. Dick Cheney, 1995-2000: chief executive of the Halliburton oil company. Condoleezza Rice, 1991-2000: senior executive with the Chevron oil company, which named an oil tanker after her. And so on. But none of these trifling associations affects the integrity of God's work.

    In 1993, while ex-President George Bush was visiting the ever-democratic Kingdom of Kuwait to receive thanks for liberating them, somebody tried to kill him. The CIA believes that "somebody" was Saddam. Hence Bush Jr's cry: "That man tried to kill my Daddy." But it's still not personal, this war. It's still necessary. It's still God's work. It's still about bringing freedom and democracy to oppressed Iraqi people.

    To be a member of the team you must also believe in Absolute Good and Absolute Evil, and Bush, with a lot of help from his friends, family and God, is there to tell us which is which. What Bush won't tell us is the truth about why we're going to war. What is at stake is not an Axis of Evil -- but oil, money and people's lives. Saddam's misfortune is to sit on the second biggest oilfield in the world. Bush wants it, and who helps him get it will receive a piece of the cake. And who doesn't, won't.

    If Saddam didn't have the oil, he could torture his citizens to his heart's content. Other leaders do it every day -- think Saudi Arabia, think Pakistan, think Turkey, think Syria, think Egypt.

    Baghdad represents no clear and present danger to its neighbours, and none to the US or Britain. Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, if he's still got them, will be peanuts by comparison with the stuff Israel or America could hurl at him at five minutes' notice. What is at stake is not an imminent military or terrorist threat, but the economic imperative of US growth. What is at stake is America's need to demonstrate its military power to all of us -- to Europe and Russia and China, and poor mad little North Korea, as well as the Middle East; to show who rules America at home, and who is to be ruled by America abroad.

    The most charitable interpretation of Tony Blair's part in all this is that he believed that, by riding the tiger, he could steer it. He can't. Instead, he gave it a phoney legitimacy, and a smooth voice. Now I fear, the same tiger has him penned into a corner, and he can't get out.

    It is utterly laughable that, at a time when Blair has talked himself against the ropes, neither of Britain's opposition leaders can lay a glove on him. But that's Britain's tragedy, as it is America's: as our Governments spin, lie and lose their credibility, the electorate simply shrugs and looks the other way. Blair's best chance of personal survival must be that, at the eleventh hour, world protest and an improbably emboldened UN will force Bush to put his gun back in his holster unfired. But what happens when the world's greatest cowboy rides back into town without a tyrant's head to wave at the boys?

    Blair's worst chance is that, with or without the UN, he will drag us into a war that, if the will to negotiate energetically had ever been there, could have been avoided; a war that has been no more democratically debated in Britain than it has in America or at the UN. By doing so, Blair will have set back our relations with Europe and the Middle East for decades to come. He will have helped to provoke unforeseeable retaliation, great domestic unrest, and regional chaos in the Middle East. Welcome to the party of the ethical foreign policy.

    There is a middle way, but it's a tough one: Bush dives in without UN approval and Blair stays on the bank. Goodbye to the special relationship.

    I cringe when I hear my Prime Minister lend his head prefect's sophistries to this colonialist adventure. His very real anxieties about terror are shared by all sane men. What he can't explain is how he reconciles a global assault on al-Qaeda with a territorial assault on Iraq. We are in this war, if it takes place, to secure the fig leaf of our special relationship, to grab our share of the oil pot, and because, after all the public hand-holding in Washington and Camp David, Blair has to show up at the altar.

    "But will we win, Daddy?"

    "Of course, child. It will all be over while you're still in bed."

    "Why?"

    "Because otherwise Mr Bush's voters will get terribly impatient and may decide not to vote for him."

    "But will people be killed, Daddy?"

    "Nobody you know, darling. Just foreign people."

    "Can I watch it on television?"

    "Only if Mr Bush says you can."

    "And afterwards, will everything be normal again? Nobody will do anything horrid any more?"

    "Hush child, and go to sleep."

    Last Friday a friend of mine in California drove to his local supermarket with a sticker on his car saying: "Peace is also Patriotic". It was gone by the time he'd finished shopping.

    Copyright 2003 Times Newspapers Ltd

  5. Women Give Peace Their Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
  6. Can't fool me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It's a repurposed toy.

  7. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    A Beowulf Cluster Imagines YOU!

  8. Re:Why only 17GB? by trmj · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    heh.. I *so* got to it 30 seconds before you.

    Pretty sad though considering I'm on a dialup that only gets 46.6Kbps...

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  9. You know what that site is, irght? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You know what that site is, right? I read about this in Rolling Stone magazine. All these gay dudes are totally stoked with the idea of getting AIDS they they are trying to infect themselves. I shit you not. They're called 'bug chasers' and their lifelong dream is to get AIDS and die in some super erotic fucking glory.

    1. Re:You know what that site is, irght? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, and those same queers probably want more taxpayer money to fight AIDS, so we can all pay for their drug cocktails after they purposely get infected semen pumped in every hole of their bodies.

  10. that is wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Peepoh:One hot dog in a bun, comin' right up!

    YourMissionForToday:Go and steal stuff now!

    YourMissionForToday:with a forklift!

    Peepoh:Yes, Master of Forkliftery! I must obey!

    YourMissionForToday:but don't get it too heavy, or it could weigh down your forklift!

    Peepoh:Not the Power Jackoff 2000! Let's get a bunch of blow up dolls and dress them up in graduation robes, and leave them in Church!@

    Peepoh:then we steal the stations of the cross with our forklifts!

    YourMissionForToday:Yeah, then we blame it on the blowup dolls!

    Peepoh:yeah! and it'll work because the night before we'll replace their security tapes with tapes we've edited of the dolls perpetrating the crime!

    YourMissionForToday:Yeah, with zombies dressed up as Lenin and Stalin helping them!

    Peepoh:no, the zombies ARE Lenin and Stalin!

    YourMissionForToday:Great idea, but they wear party hats and the blow up dolls only get to wear graduation hats

    Peepoh:yeah, at first.

    YourMissionForToday:and there's a jesus piñata!

    Peepoh:but then we DRILL the fuck out of their zombie asses with our big industrial drills!

    YourMissionForToday:right, and then we look like the heroes!

    YourMissionForToday: (we have to dress like mexican peasants)

    Peepoh:yeah, because the cops would arrive on the scene just in time to witness us spraying zombie innards all over the tabernacle!

    YourMissionForToday:Yeah, and then we just post like mexican construction workers who stopped by to pray to our lady of guadalupe on our way home after the night shift!

    Peepoh:oh good thinking! that explains why we have the big industrial drills at church!

    YourMissionForToday:That, and cause we were going to get them blessed for St. Blaises' Day!

    Peepoh:When we drill into people's throats!

    YourMissionForToday:And then we claim that we're Michael the Archangel after we do that...no, wait, you're Michael the Archangel and I'm Captain America!

    Peepoh:no, you're Leonardo the Archangel, John's Donatello the Archangel, and Robert is Raphael the Archangel!

    YourMissionForToday:Cowabunga, d00d! You're right!

  11. Obbligatory Kneejerk Reaction by rasteri · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The other 3Gb must contain DRM AND SPYWARE!!! Sony is EVIL!!!!!

  12. Guten Morgen by simontek2 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Auf deutsch? Spiel mit linux. der Affe ist unter dem Schreibtisch, den der Hund im Baum ist, der an deutsche Kategorie sich erinnert, dieser für Ihre Unterhaltung ist.

    --
    SimonTek