Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Sends Broken Stylesheets to Opera

An anonymous reader writes "The Register has a story that the MSN homepage serves a different style sheet to the Opera web browser that makes Opera appear to be broken. Is this deliberate or a mistake? Who can possibly say? Opera's own take on the situation can be found here." This is not the first time.

24 of 938 comments (clear)

  1. Opera should respond by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny

    Opera should respond by automatically translating any page on the Microsoft web site into German and back again with Babelfish.

    1. Re:Opera should respond by evilviper · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Welcommen to SmallDelicate.com"

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Opera should respond by realkiwi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shouldn't that be Norwegian?

      --
      realkiwi
    3. Re:Opera should respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pornoliz it http://www.pornolize.com/

  2. Aww, come on... by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think we should give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt here. I mean, it's really easy to slip up and identify a specific user agent, and serve a web page to it that has a content margin set to -30 pixels. We've all done it before, right?

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Aww, come on... by Shalda · · Score: 4, Funny

      I remember back to about '97 or so, at the height of the browser wars, every time I went to the Microsoft web site with Navigator 3.0, Navigator would GPF. Of course, the same thing would happen if I went to the Netscape site with IE 3.0. Which was ironic, because I was going there to download Navigator.

    2. Re:Aww, come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, its just like all the times those innocent ACs accidently slipped "goatse.cx" links in their "first posts"...
      They didn't mean it, it was an innocent mistake. I'm sure Microsoft is the same... just a big innocent troll.


      At last someone finally understands us! We don't mean to, its all been just a big misunderstanding

      oh, and not FP!

  3. Re:No fear of prosecurion, no problem! by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Funny

    >back to the bad old days at Microsoft

    Drat, I must have missed the good days.

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Re:No fear of prosecurion, no problem! by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why would anyone want to visit msn.com anyway?

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  6. Re:Who uses Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When the revolution comes, your ass will be 6 feet under.

  7. Dear anonymous reader who contributed this article by frizzzanks · · Score: 1, Funny

    You've certainly come to the right place for an objective opinion on Microsoft policies.

  8. Re:and why... by sharkey · · Score: 1, Funny

    Because I wanted to see this behaviour first-hand in my browser, after reading this post on Slashdot.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  9. I can't believe its not Micro$oft by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please someone create a browser (just use the Moz code) and call it "I can't believe its not Internet Explorer" and have that as the User-Agent string!!

    Honestly - it would be soo tops. That would appear in everones web access log, and they'd be wondering what it was, and so they'd download it too.

    Or just add a "not internet exploder" user-agent string option to Moz? Because you shouldn't need the UA string anyway - just use the Accepts header!

    Please someone... do this? For me? For us?

  10. Re:No fear of prosecurion, no problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dude, this MSN page looks pretty messed up in *any* browser. How's that for cross-browser compatibility eh?

  11. Re:Slashdot and w3.org... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I predict a mysterious but sudden moderation to -1 Offtopic in your future...

  12. illogically speaking.... by branchstudios · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're right, it must be an mistake. It's well known that most web designers will post browser specific versions of major sites without ever testing/debugging them on the browser for which they're built. This sort of thing happens all the time.

    Now, what's the W3C compliant way to get my [sarcasm] [/sarcasm] tags to display properly?

    1. Re:illogically speaking.... by PetWolverine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now, what's the W3C compliant way to get my [sarcasm] [/sarcasm] tags to display properly?

      Use angle brackets, making them display properly with this syntax, thus:

      <sarcasm>
      [insert sarcastic comment here]
      </sarcasm>

      Once parsed by a browser, that should display as:

      <sarcasm>
      [insert sarcastic comment here]
      </sarcasm>

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  13. Re:Standards schmandards. by Bob(TM) · · Score: 3, Funny

    My browser is set to send nonsense ...

    Coincidentally, so are most web servers.

    --

    The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
  14. Re:No fear of prosecurion, no problem! by ratamacue · · Score: 3, Funny
    Why would anyone want to visit msn.com anyway?

    Maybe they don't want to. But Internet Explorer certainly does.

  15. Re:pornolizing it by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny
    Funny AND useful. I've never before actually had the misfortune to go to msn.com, but it was really worth it after it was pornolized.

    a quote:

    MSNBC News

    • * Powell titty fucks his case to Congress
    pretty accurate, too.
  16. Re:Slashdot and w3.org... by Nicopa · · Score: 4, Funny
    Dialog:

    Slashdot: Microsoft Sends Broken Stylesheets to Opera.
    The people: So what, you send broken HTML to everybody!

  17. Re:Clearly This Sucks but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    Or maybe it is time for another "which site is most popular" statistics, and MSN is trying to generate traffic by having this come out on /.

  18. Strange by ink · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are many (most? all?) companies that are much smaller that manage to not alienate customers intentionally. I am a big customer of Microsoft's; we buy a ton of software from them. I just use Linux, and I like to look up answers on their site using Mozilla, or UNLOCK MY VOLUME LICENSES on their website, which requires a passport account (which, incidentlly, is how I stumbled into this bug in the first place). I was trying to give them money, and they just slapped me in the face.

    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.