Slashdot Mirror


The Making of the Atomic Bomb

chrisd has taken time off from polls and posting to both read and review Richard Rhodes' The Making of the Atomic Bomb. Read on for his impressions of the book, which he says is "not really a story about the men so much as the science they pursued." The Making of the Atomic Bomb author Richard Rhodes pages 886 Pages publisher Touchstone/Simon and Schuster rating 5 out of 5 uh, somethings reviewer Chris DiBona ISBN 0684813785 summary How the bomb came to be.

Lansing Lamont's Day of Trinity was the first book I read about the Manhattan Project. In what turns out to be a decent if uncritical look at the pursuit of atomic weaponry, Lansing was given exclusive access throughout the life of the Manhattan Project. In reading the book you feel like you have a fly-on-the-wall view of the process of producing the first uranium and plutonium bombs.

Lamont's telling is a bit thin though, not going into the motivations of the scientists and only barely touching on the geopolitical situation at the time. This not to say that it is craven, but it is overly sympathetic and a bit too rah-rah about atomic weaponry and their usefulness.

In the book, Mr. Rhodes takes the time to explore the base motivations of the scientists. Ever wonder exactly what motivated Teller's bloodthirstiness? What inspired the scientists to continue driving toward the atomic prize even after the fall of Germany? Rhodes has spent the time researching exactly what made the major players tick.

This is all well and good, but probably the most enjoyable thing about the book is how it's not really a story about the men so much as the science they pursued. The book is not really about the bombs, either, but more the history of physics and physicists.

Always keeping the science accessible and exciting, he manages to explain concisely the process of discovery and experimentation and how the significant events of history affected both the project's progress.

The way that Mr. Rhodes tracks the movements of physicists from anti-semitic Germany to Los Alamos, Chicago and other centers of the nuclear arms program is especially compelling and lends keen insight into the motivations of the physicists involved.

One of the most important (and stomach churning) things about the book is how it shows how cheap human life became in the first half of the 20th century. I think that it is important, when considering the horror of dropping bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, that people have the proper historical context before coming to one conclusion or another about the morality of the dropping of the bomb. This book gives that context.

This is not to say that this is a perfect book. Reaching as it does from the mid 1800s through to the dawn of Teller's super-bomb, the book's scope means that some discoveries and scientists don't get the in-depth coverage that Bohr, Szilard and Oppenheimer do, and he doesn't talk much at all about the espionage that surrounded nuclear development. Nor in my mind does he fully answer the question of why the scientists remained motivated to produce the weapons after Germany had been conquered.

Those caveats aside, this is a terrific book well worth checking out if you are interested in the birth of modern physics, the men and women behind it, or the most powerful weapon that has ever been used on humans.

You can purchase The Making of the Atomic Bomb from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

2 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. The Atom Bomb: A Christly Venture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Never before in the history of Mankind has there ever been an equalizer like the atomic bomb. The stone spearhead helped the Neanderthal Man usurp Homo Erectus as king of the hominids, the catapult and the arrow helped the Anglos crush the Saxons, and the atomic bomb brought an end to Nazi/Nipponese aggression and eventually delivered the glory of Christ to billions of Soviets suffering under Communistic enslavement.

    It is clear that J. Robert Oppenheimer, Robert Goddard, Albert Einstein, and the rest of the tiger team that worked on the Manhattan Project had nothing but moral purposes in mind. The atomic bomb is an instrument of hope, not terror. Christ Himself said that splitting the atom would lead to a new world of peace and harmony if we did not allow Islam to get out of hand. We have heeded His first piece of advice but ignored the second, and now we face a new threat brought on by our own failure to keep infidelity in check.

    To cleanse the world of evil and return it to morality, we must use our sizable nuclear arsenal to rid the world of the Muslimic threat. By dropping 10-megaton warheads on Islamic epicenters such as Baghdad, Mecca, Medina, Detroit, Damascus, Tehran, Riyadh, and Cordoba, we can instantly remove the vast majority of the evil that threatens moral society. Please write your Congressman and demand that we cleanse the world, and implore the others within your congregation to do the same. The power of Christ compels you. The power of Christ compels you.

  2. Is it a 'how-too' book? by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh wait, that's 'restricted knowledge'.. Along with a lot of other things now..

    Must not allow the citizens to have information.. or allow them the ability to take care of themselves.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----