Slashdot Mirror
Cloneable Mammoth Cells Discovered in Russia
orthogonal writes "Animal Planet reports, in this article, that 'Russian scientists said Wednesday that they've found living cells in a frozen ice-age mammoth' which could be cloned, and gestated in an elephant. I see a new Republican mascot in this."
If they reconstitute that species, they better reconstitute it's least powerful predator as well.
Yeah, because we all know how difficult it has been to controll the elephant populations of the world. Without any preditors, they are multiplying uncontrollably.
---Lane
Why bother? Its most effective predator is alive and well. And now instead of spears, they have firearms.
But then again, I could be wrong.
Seriously though, I don't think this is a good idea. What possible purpose (save entertainment value) could be served by reviving a long extinct species? (A species which has been long extinct for a reason, I might add.)
There are really two reasons, the entertainment/turist value and as an experiment. You need more reasons to get turists to go to Syberia aside from prison camps and cold weather. The experiment part is that we don't have any experience with interspecies cloning to date and there are likely to be significant hurdles. If you don't have a mammoth egg you will be trying to create a creature with part elephant and part mammoth DNA. This means there will probably be essential mitochondria missing. We'll need to figure out where we can get the missing ones, either by repairing the elephant copies that no longer function or by finding similar DNA/RNA in other creatures. There is also the question of knowing if you really are missing something. What if the creature looks like a mammoth but can't digest the syberian vegitation, is that because the vegitation has changed or because the animal is missing some enzyme?
While you might believe in extinction always happens for good reasons. In this case, there is good reason to believe it was simply the result of bad land management by the ancient human inhabitants who overhunted the creature to extinction. The had depended on it and there were probably mass starvation of humans once they eliminated their source of food, shelter, clothing, and fuel. Not only is there evidence of the overhunting, but there were isolated islands where the mammoth lived into historic times simply because they weren't hunted. But this isn't going to bring the mammoth back, very few creatures have any chance of survival once their genetic pool gets constricted to a few hundred creatures. It would take another 10,000 years for them to recover their genetic health if we had that many, and frankly that is impossible. The best we could hope for is some DNA that could help us save the Asian or African elephants if it comes to that. (The plains African elephant is in a healthy recovery in enough countries but that may change with AIDS, and we just don't know enough about the forest elephant, which we just realized was a different species last year. The Asian elephant may be genetically saved through domestication, but it's wild cousin is practically gone.) But, there are big cats that have had hardly recovered from the feline AIDS pandemic before humans started burning down the land to create farms, the techniques learned with mammoths might be able to save them genetically from extinction do to our early inefficient farming efforts. This would save us the effort of trying to successfully introduce new predators to their ranges, something we've not had great success with before.
While I'm sure ADM and the Sierra Club both have uses for interspecies cloning the main arguement for learning how to do it is just for the basic knowledge of how we work, using mammoths is not only going to give them headlines, which are essential to getting funding, but is also practical because we actually do have some from over 10,000 years ago, providing a great snapshot into the past.