Slashdot Mirror
Linux Movies Picture Gallery
An anonymous reader writes "Shots of Linux being used in movie production including Star Wars, Scooby-Doo, Collateral Damage, and other films. The Linux Movies Group is an open group advancing Linux motion picture technology, founded by Robin Rowe who leads the Film Gimp project."
They say that Film Gimp is more suitable for films. Now I wonder - what program is easier for colorizing greyscale images: Film Gimp or Plain Gimp?
Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
Nave H. Weiss
ingram% telnet www.asiacarrera.com 80
Trying 209.163.238.131...
Connected to asiacarrera.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.0
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:32:47 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.19 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) PHP/4.0.4pl1 mod_perl/1.21 FrontPage/4.0.4.3
Last-Modified: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 01:59:58 GMT
ETag: "50013-1cc7-3e139d1e"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 7367
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html
Connection closed by foreign host.
You may be missing the humor inherent in the original poster's comment:
I don't know what amazes me more; the fact that Linux is being used by professional artists to create blockbuster films... or the fact that application developers are still using Tk!
Tk is a graphics toolkit. It's also a suck-ass graphics toolkit, and it's also impossible to separate from a suck-ass language called TCL (pronounced "tickle"); you can get Tk bindings for perl, python, etc., etc. but it still requires TCL. TCL/Tk is so suck-ass that I find it hard to believe that someone would actually consider using it for a new project - thus, it's incredible.
In all fairness, TCL/Tk was the only GUI scripting environment for Unix many years ago. Back in the day, your choices for X11 GUI toolkits were TCL/Tk (suck-ass), Motif (costs $$), Athena (looks nasty, confusing semantics), or DIY with Xlib (which isn't as hard as it sounds, but takes time). Nowadays we have really nice toolkits like Qt and wxWindows (and GTK for those who refuse to program in C++), but the pyhon and perl people still consider Tk the "canonical" toolkit for their languages. Really a pity, since wxPython is much nicer RAD environment.
... the RIAA will get ya if you try to *play* their resulting DVD in Linux.... :)
Interesting double standard dontcha think?
Just my 4-DVDs-for-49-cents worth
RickTheWizKid
Tcl is a pretty simple scripting language and Tk is a pretty simple GUI toolkit. And that's exactly why people still use them.
What are the alternatives? There isn't much. The most popular is scripting language bindings to Gtk+ or wxWindows or Qt. But those just expose very complex toolkits to a scripting language, rather than creating a simpler, more high-level way of specifying a GUI (and, no, GLADE doesn't do the trick either).
Tcl/Tk clearly needs to be replaced--it is aging and limited. But until something better than scripting language bindings to C/C++ toolkits comes out, Tcl/Tk will continue to be used.