Slashdot Mirror


ABA Withdraws Consideration of UCITA

Cognito writes "AFFECT, Americans for Fair Electronic Commerce Transactions, is reporting that the American Bar Association has withdrawn its consideration for endorsing a resolution to approve UCITA, the Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act. This is a good thing. It's interesting to note that a recently filed law suit would have been prohibited if UCITA were endorsed and adopted as a common law."

13 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Is for lamers and d00ds with no testicles.

  2. frist spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    frost spit

  3. ah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    First, bruhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    I had to do it, and I appologies repeatedly. XD

  4. AFFwhat? by u38cg · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Didn't understand a single bloody word of that. What does this AUICITPQXRWS thingy do then?

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  5. This misses the point entirely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    We're talking central London. very Central London. This is all office blocks, shops, and clubhouses. Property here is really expensive, and real estate is at a premium. Widening the roads would either require rebuilding practically the whole of the area or removing pedestrian walkways. Neither is practical.

    The point of the congestion charge is however to move traffic onto the public transport systems instead. Of which both the bus and tube networks are overcrowded anyway, especially the Tube. The Govn't claims the Tube isn't overcrowded, but the Underground regularly closes stations due to overcrowding and is jam-packed* for a very broad definition of 'Rush Hour'.

    At the moment, of course, a couple of the arterial underground lines are closed due to a derailment that happened a couple of weeks ago. This has made it oh so much worse...

    *Disclaimer: not as full as systems like the Tokyo tube, obviously, but London isn't nearly as dense and could be vastly improved.

  6. Thank you.. by Karamchand · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ..for telling me whether this is a good or a bad thing! If slashdot wouldn't tell me which things are good and which are bad I'd have to go through life completely disoriented!

  7. Re:Tsarkon REports crap - YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You need to update your troll to 2003; YOU FAIL IT

  8. Current Electronic Commerce is Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Since companies are using ".com" and not their country codes, you may have no recourse if the website you're buying from is in fact a front-end for an automated credit-card stealing system located in some remote country where the law is just a guideline. And no, even if the website sports known companies logos and gives an address in the U.S., it could all be fake.

    You CAN'T shop online until companies start using country codes and DNS is secured.

  9. Grammer Nazism by I_am_God_Here · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Americans for Fair Electronic Commerce Transactions, is reporting that the American Bar Association has withdrawn its consideration for endorsing a resolution to approve UCITA, the Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act. This is a good thing.

    Does this refer to the UCITA being good, or the ABA withdrawl good? Your antecedent is unclear.

    --

    Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
    Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
  10. Real Grammer Nazism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Dear Troll,

    The antecedent is perfectly clear.

    The qualifying statement followed a period, thus the entire sentence before it is qualified. If the poster had used a comma then perhaps your comment could be valid.

    I'd also like to point out that neither of your options are the actual gramatical truth of the statement. The statement, as posted, says that AFECT's reporting of the event, not the event or the resolution itself, is good.

    -AC

  11. Moderators Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Again, this is a great post! Don't MOD it
    down. You can't say what's he's saying by
    sugar coating it or saying it in a long winded
    way. It's short and to the point and says
    what needs to be said. Hell, it's a +5.

  12. IN OTHER NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    MONS to withdraw consideration of CLIT at forthcoming LABIA-Con. Matt Drudge is there!

  13. Well, I'm about to get banned for 24hrs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    But ... moderators still suck.