Slashdot Mirror


Murchison Meteorite Still Contentious

An anonymous reader writes "The well-known 1969 meteorite that fell 60 miles north of Melbourne, Australia, remains remarkably contentious today. The 100 kilogram carbon rock : a) contains pre-biotic proteins and 12% water; b) harbors 50 amino acids not found on Earth; c) favors the tell-tale signature of biochemistry based on a dominant left-handed chirality, compared to random or racemic mixtures found in test-tube syntheses. While terrestrial contamination (even interior to the meteor) may discount this so-called 'Murchison meteor', its light isotopes of carbon and nitrogen suggest the left-handed amino acids not found elsewhere on Earth have the same ratios as the right-handed ones. This would not be the case if, say, bacteria was just making the left-handed ones after impact. Seems quite a controversy from down-under."

11 of 211 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Just want to ask.. by Sheetrock · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rocks are porous. It's unlikely scientists are going to find a pigeon in the center of a meteorite, but anything dust particle or smaller could make it in.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  2. Chirality by BWJones · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article: A curious aspect of Earth's life forms is that they contain (with few exceptions) only left-handed amino acids. In contrast, when scientists synthesize amino acids from nonchiral precursors, the result is always a "racemic" mixture - equal numbers of right- and left-handed forms. Scientists have been unable to perform any experiment that, when starting with conditions believed to emulate those of early Earth, results in a near-total dominance of left-handed amino acids, says George Cody, a geochemist at the Carnegie Institute of Washington.

    In many cases, the levorotary forms are lower energy structures and would be favored during synthesis. The fact that many L based systems are almost exclusively so is dependant upon the larger structures that are based upon amino acids and other small molecules. Often a D form of a molecule will not be able to integrate into a L structure.

    This is not to say that D forms cannot have biological activity however as there are many instances I can think of where racemic mixtures of molecules can have biological activity. For instance, the 2 chiral forms of carvone have completely different smells due to receptors in the olfactory epithelium being activated by each of the racemic forms.

    Some instances of similarity of molecular structure but different chirality have also resulted in catastophies. One only has to think of MPTP poisoning the neurons of the substantia nigra or potentially thalidomide.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Chirality by abhinavnath · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's an interesting theory you've got going there. Unfortunately, the handedness of DNA does not determine the chirality of amino acids used.

      The handedness of DNA is determined by the handedness of the sugar in its "backbone" - that is, B-DNA is right-handed because it contains D-deoxyribose instead of L-deoxyibose. A hypothetical DNA molecule formed using L-deoxyribose would have a left-handed B-DNA helix. (Now remember that the A, B and Z forms of DNA are artifacts of it being a double helix. These are three different stable conformations of a DNA double helix (local minima). Z-DNA is globally unstable, and unusual in nature, because it requires some of the bases in DNA to flip from their usual "anti" conformation relative to deoxyribose to a less stable "syn" conformation.)

      There is no reason that an RNA-based "enzyme" (similar to parts of a ribosome) would inherently prefer one isomer of an amino acid over another. It's just that once machinery had evolved to synthesize/utilize one isomer, it becomes very inefficient to use a whole 'nother set of enzymes for the other isomer of the same amino acid (unless you really really need a D-amino acid, as in bacterial cell walls). Dumb chance dictated that L-amino acids were chosen, for the most part, over D-amino acids.

      Interestingly, the D/L conventions of sugars and of amino acids both derive from the isomers of glyceraldehyde, the simplest 3-carbon sugar. Whether a compound is D or L is determined by the orientation of the major group on the 2-carbon, when the molecule is drawn in the Fischer projection. The D/L convention is just that, a convention, and does not affect the chemical or optical properties of compounds in any consistent fashion. (That is, D/L names are totally distinct from dextrorotatory/laevorotatory names, which denote optical activity. It sucks, but there it is.) Your parent post is just flat out wrong when it says L-amino acids are energetically more favored than D-amino acids.

      --
      My other sig is also a .Porsche
  3. Re:Relevance? by helix400 · · Score: 2, Informative
    10 billion years ago a gigantic asteroid hits earth...

    The earth is only roughly 4.55 billion years old.

    But that would just mean the asteroid in your example would only have to hit...say...2 billion years ago.

  4. Re:Let me ask this... by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first Apollo mission found the moon to be sterile, but later Apollo missions found strep bacteria from previous missions.

    That's a little misleading. Apollo 12 found microbes inside the camera of Surveyor 3 (which landed three years before). Its not like the strep bacteria are colonizing the moon -- I'm pretty sure that the lunar environment is still sterile.

    --
    "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
  5. Re:Blah, Blah Blah.... by Fembot · · Score: 5, Informative

    c) favors the tell-tale signature of biochemistry based on a dominant left-handed chirality, compared to random or racemic mixtures found in test-tube syntheses.

    If a molecule has a carbon with 4 different groups bonded to it then there are two different ways of making the same thing but with different physical layouts eg:

    W
    |
    X -C- Y
    |
    Z

    Or:

    X
    |
    W -C- Y
    |
    Z

    Basicaly these have a "non superimposable mirror image" (no matter how much you rotate them and you can never have all the x,y,x and z's lined up)

    Generaly the left handed and right handed molcules have very quite different behaviours, for instance some drugs use only one of the versions, whilst the other version is a poision.

    A racemic mixture is a mixture of 50-50 of the left handed and right handed molecules, and generaly chemical processes will produce a racemic mixture.

  6. Re:Auto-Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    so..... this is probably immoral, if not illegal, but their javascript source for it is in the cleverly named file javascript/showimages.php...

    actually took a little while to find it, thanks to the somewhat deceiving name.

  7. Re:Relevance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    All amino acids produced by living things on earth are left-handed. Ones that occur in lab synthesis have random chirality. I don't fully understand the process behind this, but the handedness of the amino acids assures they were generated biotically, and the fact that many of the amino acids are new suggests that they're extraterrestrial in origin. If true, this would be a much less contentious evidence of the existence of extraterrestrial life than the martian fossils you mentioned.

  8. circular polarized light could forms L-amino acids by searleb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Recent research suggests that there is an excess of L-amino acids (the specific enantiomer used in life-proteins) found in space, suggesting that the chiral specific process involving circular polarized light (mentioned in the article) could have lead to the amino acids that were found on the Murchison (and other meteorites).

    From the article:
    Recently it has been discovered that an excess of L-amino acids is present in the Murchison and Murray meteorites indicating that a preference for L-amino acids existed in solar system material before there was life on Earth. This supports an idea, first proposed by Rubenstein et al. (1983, Nature 306, 118), for an extraterrestrial origin for homochirality.

    In this model the action of circular polarized light on interstellar chiral molecules introduced a left handed excess into molecules in the material from which the solar system formed. ...

    If our own solar system formed in such a region of high circular polarization, it could have led to the excess of L-amino acids which we see in meteorites and to the homochirality of biological molecules. It is possible that without such a process operating it would not be possible for life to start. This may have implications for the frequency of occurrence of life in the universe.

  9. Re:Blah, Blah Blah.... by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Generaly the left handed and right handed molcules have very quite different behaviours, for instance some drugs use only one of the versions, whilst the other version is a poision.

    Or sugar - right-handed - and sucralose - left-handed. Sucralose is equally sweet, but non-metabolizable, hence its use in diet food.

    -T

  10. read the article? by twitter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Assides from the non sequetor, which applies regardless, did you read the article? If you had read it and the intro above, you would have noticed that the amino-acids not found on earth also are mostly "left-handed" which is not how they form in a lab.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.